Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.11.2025
Home Issues 2009 Year Issue №5 FOSTER FAMILY AS A WAY OF ARRANGEMENT OF CHILDREN WITHOUT PARENT’S CARE IN THE USA
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

FOSTER FAMILY AS A WAY OF ARRANGEMENT OF CHILDREN WITHOUT PARENT’S CARE IN THE USA

Besschetnova Oksana Vladimirovna

Information About Author:

The article dwells to the features of forming and functioning of foster family system as a social institution for raising children without parent’s care, based on the legislation of the USA.

Keywords: foster family, The USA, orphans, children without parent’s care, legislation, kinship care, kinship placements, foster care payment

References:

1. Karger H. J. & Stoesz D. American social welfare policy: A Pluralist Approach (4th ed.). – Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2002.

2. Wan L. Parents killing parents: Creating a presumption of unfi tness. Albany Law review, 63(1), 1999.

3. Department of Health and Human Services 2004. National adoption and foster care statistics // www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/

4. Foster care adoption in the United States: A state by State Analysis of barriers & Promising Approaches // www.nationaladoptionday.org

5. Geen R. Who will adopt the foster care children left behind? Caring for Children. Brief № 2 // www.urban.org/url.cfm

6. Geen R., Boots S. W., Tumlin K. C. The Cost of Protecting Vulnerable Children: Understanding the Complexities of federal, State, and Local Child Welfare Spending. Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute Press, 1999.

7. Murray J., Ehrle J., Geen R. Estimating fi nancial support for kinship caregivers // New federalism (National Survey of America’s Families). The Urban Institute. Series B, № B-63, December 2004.

8. Sandra C., Everett J., Verdieck M. J., Jones H. Children Placed in Foster care with Relatives: A Multi-State Study. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, 1998.

9. Cook R., Ciarico J. Unpublished analysis of kinship care data from the National Study of Protective, preventive and reunifi cation Services Delivered to Children and Their Families. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau, 1998.

10. Berrick Jill D., Needell B. Recent trends in Kinship Care: Public Policy, Payments, and Outcomes for Children. In The Foster Care Crisis: Translating Research into Policy and Practice, edited by Patrick A. Curtis, Grady Dale Jr., and Joshua C. Kendall (152-74). Lincoln: University of Nebraska press in association with the Child welfare League of America, 1999.

11. Geen R. Finding Permanent Homes for Foster Children: Issues Raised by Kinship Care // The Urban Institute. Series A, # A-60, April 2003.

12. Howard D., Harrington D., Starr R., Zuravin S., Sawyer R. Children in Kinship Care: How do they fare? // Children and Youth Services Review 16 (1-2): 85-106, 1994.

13. Jantz A., Green R., Bess R., Andrews C., Russell V. The Continuing Evolution of State Kinship Care Policies. Washington, D. C.: The Urban

Institute, 2002.

14. Geen R. Kinship Care: Making the Most of a Valuable Resource. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 2003.

15. Andrews C., Bess R., Jantz A., Russell V. Collaboration between State Welfare and Child Welfare Agencies. Washington, D. C.: the Urban Institute. Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief A-54, 2002.

16. Amy J., Geen R., Andrews R. C., Russell V. The Continuing Evolution of State Care Policies. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Assessing the New Federalism Discussion Paper 02-11, 2002.

17. Waldrop D. P., Weber J. A. From Grandparent to Caregiver: the Stress and Satisfaction of Raising Grandchildren. Families in Society: the Journal of Contemporary Human Services 82(5): 461-72, 2001.

18. Minkler M., Fuller-Thompson E., Miller D., Driver D. Grandparent Caregiving and depression. In Grandparents raising Grandchildren, edited by Bert Hayslip Jr. and Robin Goldberg-Glen (207-19). New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2000.

19. Hughes D. Adopting Children with Attachment problems. Child Welfare 78: 541-60, 1999; Karen, R. Becoming Attached. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

20. Ehrle J., Geen R. Children Cared for by Relatives: What Services Do They Need? Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute. Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief B-47, 2002.

21. Scarcella C. A., Ehrle J., Geen R. Identifying and Addressing the Needs of Children in Grandparent Care. Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute, B-55, 2003.

Besschetnova_O._V._40_44_5_83_2009.pdf ( 356.31 kB ) Besschetnova_O._V._40_44_5_83_2009.zip ( 342.39 kB )

Issue: 5, 2009

Rubric: Pedagogy

Pages: 40 — 44

Downloads: 1899

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU