Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.05.2025
Home Issues 2013 Year Issue №11 TURGENEV’S “FATHERS AND SONS” IN THE CINEMA RECEPTION BY A. SMIRNOVA
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

TURGENEV’S “FATHERS AND SONS” IN THE CINEMA RECEPTION BY A. SMIRNOVA

Cherkezova Olga Vladimirovna

Information About Author:

The article deals with the problem of interpretative variety of Russian classics in line with structural-semantic theory of receptive codes. A. Smirnova’s film “Fathers and sons” is seen as attempt of the lyrical reception of the novel, activating the basic structural principles of Turgenev’s discourse.

Keywords: convergent discourse, receptive model, decrypting code, lyrical undertones

References:

1. Theory of Literature: in 2 v., edited by N. D. Tamarchenko. Moscow, Akademia Publ., 2010. Vol. 1. 512 p. (in Russian).

2. Bakhtin M. M. Dostoevsky. Sobraniye sochineniy in 7 v. Vol. 5. Moscow: Russkiye slovari Publ., 1997. Pp. 364–374 (in Russian).

3. Korman B. O. About the integrity of the literary work. Izvestia AN SSSR, 1977, no. 6, pp. 508–513 (in Russian).

4. Lotman Y. M. The structure of a literary text. About art. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB Publ., 1998. Pp. 14–285 (in Russian).

5. Lotman Y. M. Plot space of the Russian novel of the 19th century. About Russian literature. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB Publ., 1997. Pp. 712–730 (in Russian).

6. Markovich V. M. Person in the novels of Turgenev. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1975. 152 p. (in Russian).

7. Andreevskiy S. A. Turgenev. His personality and poetry. Andreevskiy S. Literary essays. St. Petersburg, Literaturnyye chteniya Publ., 1902. Pp. 262–318 (in Russian).

8. Pumpyanskiy L. V. Turgenev-novelist. The classical tradition. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kultury Publ., 2000. Pp. 427–447 (in Russian).

9. Zakharchenko N. A. The lyrical element in the works of I. S. Turgenev 40-50’s of the 19th century. Author. dis. cand. philol. sci. Samara, 2005. 226 p. (in Russian).

10. Polovneva M. V. Poetics of Turgenev narrative 1850’s. Author. dis. cand. philol. sci. Orel, 2002. 210 p. (in Russian).

11. Markovich V. M. I. S. Turgenev and Russian realistic novel of the 19th century (30–50’s). Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1982. 208 p. (in Russian).

12. Razumova N. Y. “A Noble Nest” and Paris “gnezdyshko”. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2010, no. 8 (98), pp. 53–56 (in Russian).

cherkezova_o._v._63_68_11_139_2013.pdf ( 411.38 kB ) cherkezova_o._v._63_68_11_139_2013.zip ( 405.13 kB )

Issue: 11, 2013

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: THE FAMILY CONCEPT IN THE PARADIGM OF ARTISTIC CONSCIOUSNESS AND AUTHOR’S MODELS

Pages: 63 — 68

Downloads: 1207

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU