Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.07.2025
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №10 OBJECTIVIZATION OF FOREST IN THE WORLDVIEW OF SELKUPS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

OBJECTIVIZATION OF FOREST IN THE WORLDVIEW OF SELKUPS

Polyakova Natalya Vladimirovna

Information About Author:

The article involves analysis of forest categorization based on the dialect material of the Selkup language. The paper considers the role of the forest in the worldview of Selkup ethnic groupand relevant forest characteristics. Everyday and mythopoetic perception of forest by the representatives of Selkup peoples is represented on the basis of folklore analysis and native literature. The role and function of trees in the Selkup culture and language are examined and observed in the article. On the basis of linguistic material analysis and results of association experiment trees having the most cultural value for the Selkup peoples are defined and described.

Keywords: the Selkup language, language worldview, objectivization, water

References:

1. Polyakova N. V. Objectivization of river in the linguistic worldview of Selkup ethnos. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2014, no. 2 (4), pp. 29–33 (in Russian).

2. Pelikh G. I. Selkups mythology. Tomsk: Publishing house of sci-tech literature, 1998. 80 p. (in Russian).

3. Kuznetsova A. I., Helimskiy A. E., Grushkina E. V. Essays about the Selkup language.Tazovsky dialect. Moscow, MGU Publ., 1980. Vol. 1. 412 p. (in Russian).

4. Selkup and Russian dialect dictionary. Under the editorship of professor V. V. Bykonya. Tomsk, TGPU Publ., 2005. 348 p. (in Russian).

5. Fairy tales of selkup natives of the Narymsk region: book for reading in the Selkup language with the Russian translation. Records, translation, comments of V. V. Bykonya, A. A. Kim etc. Tomsk, TGPU Publ., 1996. 187 p. (in Russian).

6. Baidak A. V., Maksimova N. P. Didactization of original text: the Selkup language: academic package to educational module. Tomsk: Publishinghouse ОGU “Regional Centre of Education Development”, 2002. 35 p. (in Russian).

7. Kazakevich O. A., Kuznetsova A. I., Helimski E. A. Essays about the Selkup language.Tazovsky dialect. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2002. Vol. 3. 220 p. (in Russian).

8. Selkup mythology. Scientifi c editor V. V. Napolskih. Tomsk, TGU Publ., 2004. 382 p. (in Russian).

9. Polyakova N. V. “Sacred places” in the worldview of the Selkups. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, no. 10 (125), pp. 85–88 (in Russian).

10. Bykonya V. V. Selkups: language and culture (ethnolinguistic essay). Tomsk, TGPU Publ., 2011. 236 p. (in Russian).

11. Zhakova T. E. Mythologems of sky and land in the Germanic languages (based on the Indo-European background). Dis. cand. philol. sci. Moscow, 2001. 189 p. (in Russian).

12. Tsivyan T. V. Linguisticbasis of Balkan world model. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990. 203 p. (in Russian).

13. Tereschenko N. M. The Nganasan language. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1979. 322 p. (in Russian).

14. Potebnya A. A. Word and myth. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1989. 622 p. (in Russian).

polyakova_n._v._76_80_10_151_2014.pdf ( 421.44 kB ) polyakova_n._v._76_80_10_151_2014.zip ( 415.4 kB )

Issue: 10, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: FINNO-UGRIC, SAMOYED AND TURKIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 76 — 80

Downloads: 1105

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU