Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.07.2025
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №10 THE PECULIARITIES OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT “FAMILY” IN THE LINGUISTIC CONSCIOUSNESS OF RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH-SPEAKING RESPONDENTS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE PECULIARITIES OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT “FAMILY” IN THE LINGUISTIC CONSCIOUSNESS OF RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH-SPEAKING RESPONDENTS

Vlyubchak Margarita Mikhaylovna

Information About Author:

The article deals with the peculiarities of the representation of the concept “Family” in lexicographical sources and in linguistic consciousness of Russian and English-speaking respondents. The generality and specificity of family perception and its members in the section of ethno-cultural and gender aspects, based on the analysis of the free associative experiment are examined. It is revealed that the Russian “feminine” linguistic consciousness is different from the “male” one, and that in the Russian associative field adjectives are dominated, while men have reactions expressed generally by nouns. In the men’s associative field the gender stereotypes of social roles are analyzed and the opposite perception of family members in correlation with biological sex and age.

Keywords: linguistic consciousness, lexicographical meaning, concept, associative field, gender

References:

1. Besschetnova O. V. The role of family and culture in the hierarchy of modern youth’s values: sociological aspect. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2008, no. 3 (77), pp. 40–43 (in Russian).

2. Dal’ V. I. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow, Astrel, AST Publ., 2007. 983 p. (in Russian).

3. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. UPL: http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ (Accessed: 5 December 2013).

4. The Oxford Reference Dictionary. URL: http://dictionary.reference.com/ (Accessed: 5 December 2013).

5. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. URL: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/ (Accessed: 10 December 2013).

6. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. URL: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/ (Accessed: 11 December 2013).

7. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. URL: http://www.ldoceonline.com/ (Accessed: 5 December 2013).

8. Ozhegov S. I Dictionary of the Russian language: 70 000 words. Ed. by N. U. Shvedova; 2-nd edition. Moscow, Rus. Yaz. Publ., 1989. 924 p. (in Russian).

9. Ushakov D. N. Big explanatory dictionary of the modern Russian language. Moscow, “Alta-Print”, ООО “DOM. XXI c.” Publ., 2008. Vol. VIII. 1239 p. (in Russian).

10. Biryukov V. G. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: textbook for students of the national schools. Leningrad, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1982. 384 p. (in Russian).

11. Kryuchkova N. V. The peculiarities of concept signs manifestation in the lexical system of the language and in associations (on the material of the concept “old age” in Russian). Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2006, no. 5 (56), pp. 75–79 (in Russian).

12. Sternin I. A. To the development of the psyholingustical explanatory dictionary. Questions of psycholinguistics. Moscow, RAN Publ., 2010. No. 2 (12). Pp. 57–75 (in Russian).

13. Tarasov. E. F. Language life in culture and society (instead of the opening speech). Language life in culture and society: Materials of conf. Ed. by E. F. Tarasov. Moscow, Eydos Publ., 2010. Pp. 3–8 (in Russian).

14. Borgoyakova T. G., Pokoyakova K. L. Lexicographical and psycholinguistical representation of the woman’s image in different countries. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin, 2012, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 45–50 (Series: Linguistic and cross-cultural communication) (in Russian).

15. Borgoyakova T. G., Pelevina N. N. Basic associative strategies of the man’s image representation in the language consciousness kernel of the Russian and Khakass. Philological Science. Questions of Theory and Practice: Scientifi c-Theoretical and Applied Journal. Tambov, 2012. No. 3 (14). Pp. 25–26 (in Russian).

16. Goroshko E. I. Language consciousness: gender paradigm. Moscow-Kharkov, ID INZHEK Publ., 2003. 437 p. (in Russian).

vlyubchak_m._m._129_133_10_151_2014.pdf ( 467.57 kB ) vlyubchak_m._m._129_133_10_151_2014.zip ( 461.33 kB )

Issue: 10, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCOURSE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 129 — 133

Downloads: 1523

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU