ART MODELING: ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF LITERATURE
The literary work is considered as artistic model of reality in the article. This model can be characterized by the the reproduction of the “original” and its correlation with the proper extending the boundaries of reality, opening prospects of its development. The concept of art modeling is presented in terms of their genetic relationship with inductive theory of mimesis (Aristotle) and deductive theory of the truth of art (G. V. F. Hegel). This concept allows us to characterize the modeling in the art in comparison with the modeling in science and practice, and to define the boundaries of aesthetic, leading to the destruction of works of art as integrity, reflecting the integrity of the world and man. Look at literary work as the homomorphic model of the sign, which reflects the essence of the aesthetic attitude to reality, creates prerequisites for the study of the specificity of the theoretical literature modeling literary works as combines the features of artistic and scientific modeling.
Keywords: literary work, artistic model, mimesis, substantiality, integrity
References:
1. Porozov R. Yu. Modeling as a cultural problem. Vestnik of Tomsk State University, 2014, no. 387, pp. 105–113 (in Russian).
2. Shchedrovitskiy G. P. Selected works. Moscow, Shkola Kulturnoy Politiki Publ., 1995. 800 p. (in Russian).
3. Gastev Yu. A. Homomorphisms and models. Logic-algebraic aspects of modeling. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975. 152 p. (in Russian).
4. Lotman Yu. M. The Structure of the artistic text. About the art. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo–SPB Publ., 2000. Pp. 14–287 (in Russian).
5. Lotman Yu. M. Abstracts to the problem of “Art in a series of modeling systems”. About the art. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo–SPB Publ., 2000. Pp. 387–399 (in Russian).
6. Gastev Yu. A. Model. The Great Soviet encyclopedia: 30 vol. Vol 16. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1974. Pp. 399–400 (in Russian).
7. Losev A. F. Aristotle's Doctrine about the art. The History of classical aesthetics. Aristotle and late classic. Kharkov, Folio Publ.; Moscow, Izdatelstvo AST Publ., 2000. Pp. 399–658 (in Russian).
8. Hegel G. V. F. Aesthetics: 4 vol. Vol. 1. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1968. 312 p. (in Russian).
9. Lifshits M. Hegel's aesthetics and the present. Questions of philosophy, 2001, no. 11, pp. 98–122 (in Russian).
10. Brodskiy I. Nobel lecture. 1987. Poems. Tallinn, Aleksandra Publ., 1991. Pp. 5–18 (in Russian).
11. Andrusiv S. Citation in intertextual game literature with mass culture. Scientifi c Herald of Volyn national University named after Lesya Ukrainka. Philological Sciences. Literary criticism, 2009, no. 12, pp. 3–7. (in Ukrainian).
12. Girshman M. M. The Literary work: Theory of artistic integrity. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskih kultur Publ., 2007. 560 p. (in Russian).
13. Gartmann N. Aesthetics; [per. s nem. T. S. Batischevoy, A. V. Deryuginoy, E. V. Kasyanovoy, M. K. Mamardashvili]. Kiev, Nika-tsentr Publ., 2004. 640 p. (in Russian).
( 411.29 kB ) 
( 404.91 kB )
Issue: 11, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 11
Rubric: ISSUES OF THE THEORY OF CONVENTION
Pages: 16 — 21
Downloads: 1258