Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.05.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №1 THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE STANDARDS IN EXPERT EVALUATION OF ENGLISH COURSEBOOKS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE STANDARDS IN EXPERT EVALUATION OF ENGLISH COURSEBOOKS

Karamnov Anton Sergeevich

Information About Author:

The consistent tendencies towards the standardization of education result in the implementation of language standards in different countries and regions of the world. The conditions of their emergence and functioning define the language conventions specified in the standards as the basis of foreign language learners’ linguistic competence. The language of coursebooks of English is considered to be the source for their linguistic experts’ evaluation. The language standards being used to evaluate the coursebooks lead on to developing a set of criteria for such an evaluation including the area of cross-cultural communication and communication strategies in general as well as the acquisition of concrete lexical, grammatical and functional units of language.

Keywords: language standards, competence, competency, competency-based approach, the language of coursebooks of English, linguistic analysis of coursebooks, expert evaluation of coursebooks

References:

1. McLaughlin M. W., Shepard L. A., O’Day J. A. Improving education through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-Based Education Reform. Stanford, CA. National Academy of Education, 1995. 70 p.

2. Gershunskiy B. S. Filosofi ya obrazovaniya dlya XXI veka (v poiskakh praktiko-orientirovannykh obrazovatel’nykh kontseptsiy [The philosophy of education for XXI century (in search for practice-oriented educational conceptions)]. Moscow, Sovershenstvo Publ., 1998. 608 p. (in Russian).

3. Baydenko V. I. Obrazovatel’nyy standart. Opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya [Educational standard. The experience of the system research]. Novgorod, NovSU Publ., 1999. 440 p. (in Russian).

4. Rumbeshta E. A., Bychkova A. S. Podgotovka uchitelya k realizatsii FGOS v plane formirovaniya i otsenki rezul’tatov obrazovatel’nykh dostizheniy uchshchikhsya [Teacher training to realization standard into forming and assessment of education results]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 13 (141), pp. 170–176 (in Russian).

5. Warschauer M. Millennialism and media: Language, literacy, and technology in the XXI century. AILA Review, 2001, no. 14, pp. 49–59.

6. Cummins J., Brown K., Sayers D. Literacy, Technology, and Diversity. Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2007. 280 р.

7. Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council for the Teachers of English, 1996. 106 p.

8. Phillips J. K., Abbot M. A Decade of Foreign Language Standards: Impact, Infl uence, and Future Directions. URL: http://www.actfl.org/sites/default/fi les/pdfs/public/national-standards-2011.pdf (accessed 24 December 2013).

9. Cutshall S. More Than a Decade of Standards: A Look at How Far We’ve Come. The Language Educator, 2012, vol. 8. URL: http://www.actfl .org (accessed 24 December 2013).

10. Common Core State Standards Initiative: Preparing America’s Students for College & Career. URL: http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/L/K (accessed 24 December 2013).

11. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 260 p.

12. Canale M., Swain M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1980, no. 1, pp. 1–47.

13. Bachman L. F., Palmer A. S. Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996. 384 p.

14. Konyakhina I. V. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v vysshem professional’nom obrazovanii (teoreticheskiy aspect) [Competence approach in higher professional education (theoretical-methodological aspects)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, vol. 11 (126), pp. 68–71 (in Russian).

15. Dobrydina T. I. Formirovanie professional’nikh kompetentsiy budushchikh pedagogov v protsesse obucheniya inostrannomy yaziku [The formation of future teachers’ professional competences in the process of foreign language teaching]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2010, vol. 1 (91), pp. 32–35 (in Russian).

16. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart nachal’nogo obshchego obrazovaniya (1–4 kl.) [Federal state educational standard of primary general education (years 1–4)]. URL: минобрнауки.рф/документы/922 (accessed 24 December 2013) (in Russian).

17. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya (5–9 kl.) [Federal state educational standard of secondary general education (years 5–9)]. URL: минобрнауки.рф/документы/938 (accessed 24 December 2013) (in Russian).

18. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart srednego (polnogo) obshchego obrazovaniya (10–11 kl.) [Federal state educational standard of high general education (years 10–11)]. URL: минобрнауки.рф/документы/2365 (accessed 24 December 2013) (in Russian).

19. Primernye programmy po uchebnym predmetam: nachal’naya shkola: v 2 ch. Ch. 2 [Exemplary syllabi for school subjects: primary school: in 2 parts. P. 2]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 2011. 231 p. (in Russian).

20. Primernye programmy po uchebnym predmetam. Inostrannyy yazyk. 5–9 klassy [Exemplary syllabi for school subjects. Foreign languages. Years 5–9]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 2012. 202 p. (in Russian).

karamnov_a._s._118_123_1_154_2015.pdf ( 420.2 kB ) karamnov_a._s._118_123_1_154_2015.zip ( 413.49 kB )

Issue: 1, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 1

Rubric: TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE IN HIGH SCHOOL

Pages: 118 — 123

Downloads: 1222

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU