Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.07.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №3 PROCREATIVE MOTIVES IN WOMEN OF THE AGE RANGING 19–37
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

PROCREATIVE MOTIVES IN WOMEN OF THE AGE RANGING 19–37

Shelekhov Igor Lvovich

Information About Author:

Important prerequisite for understanding the mechanisms and laws governing the formation and implementation of the psychological aspects of reproductive function of the modern woman is to study the motives of continuing the pregnancy and childbirth. Motive (lat. Moveo – to move) is an ideal or a material object, the achievement of which is a sense of activity, in this case – procreation. Women as subjects of reproductive behavior, fertility motif subjectively represented by a complex of emotions associated with the preparation for the implementation of the parent function. Proceeding from the assumption that pregnancy and childbirth for women is the highly personal significance, influence on the subsequent development of a woman as the subject of reproductive behavior and family relations, the study of motivation reveals endogenous factors of intrapersonal conflict. The article presents the results of a study designed to determine the motives that save a woman from pregnancy and childbirth. The study was conducted in medical institutions of Tomsk, during 2002–2004. Psychological examination of 150 healthy pregnant women aged 19–37 years, of which 102 nulliparous and 48 multiparous was carried out. The results of the study complete the current theoretical understanding of the psychological aspects of female reproductive function, allows us to offer solutions to a number of important scientific and practical and social problems.

Keywords: motive, identity, woman, pregnancy, childbirth, child, family

References:

1. Ilyin E. P. Differentsial’naya psihofi ziologiya muzhchiny i zhenshchiny [Differential psychophysiology of men and women]. St. Petersburg, 2002 (in Russian).

2. Ilyin E. P. Motivy i motivatsiya [Motives and motivation]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2003. 512 p. (in Russian).

3. Shelehov I. L., Berestneva O. G. Reproduktivnoe zdorov’e zhenshchiny: psihologicheskie i sotsial’nye aspekty [Reproductive health of women: psychological and social aspects: monograph]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tom. politekhn. un-ta Publ., 2013. 366 p. (in Russian).

4. Shelehov I. L., Berestneva O. G., Urazaev A. M. Psihologicheskiy portret pervorodyashchih zhenshchin [Psychological portrait of nulliparous women]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 5 (146), pp. 141–145 (in Russian).

5. Shelehov I. L., Zalevskiy G. V. Lichnostnye aspekty reproduktivnogo povedeniya, kak sistemnogo strukturno-urovnevogo fenomena [Personal aspects of reproductive behavior as system-level structural phenomenon]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Psychological Journal, 2010, no. 37, pp. 6–10 (in Russian).

6. Shelehov I. L., Slobodchikova M. Yu., Gritskevich N. K., Moreva S. A. Protivorechiya motivatsiy v vybore studentkami universiteta partnyora dlya dolgovremennyh otnosheniy [Contradictions of motivations in choosing a university student partner for long-term relationships]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Psychological Journal, 2011, no. 39, pp. 71–79 (in Russian).

shelehov_i._l._24_27_3_156_2015.pdf ( 401.77 kB ) shelehov_i._l._24_27_3_156_2015.zip ( 395.77 kB )

Issue: 3, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: GENERAL AND EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

Pages: 24 — 27

Downloads: 2897

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU