Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 19.06.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №3 EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PHYSICAL TRAINING (PUBLISHED AS DISCUSSION)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PHYSICAL TRAINING (PUBLISHED AS DISCUSSION)

Yakhontov Sergey Vladislavovich, Kulemzin Andrey Vladimirovich, Gromova O. L.

Information About Author:

The article describes a working concept of an integrated evaluation of the effectiveness of physical training. It is proved that the positive effect of training is achieved in case of the balance of the factors that determine physical activity, by means of physical culture. The conclusion is that the health benefits of physical training can be assessed only at the highest possible balance of physical development parameters with the parameters of hemodynamic and autonomic provision of physical activity, taking into account their involvement in the implementation of the regulatory systems of the body.

Keywords: physical culture, evaluation of functional reserves

References:

1. Yakhontov S. V., Gritskevich N. K., Shalagina L. Sh. Adaptivnyy potentsial i polusharnye asimmetrii mladshikh shkol’nikov [Adaptive potential and hemispheric asymmetry of younger students]. Tomsk, TGPU Publ., 2000 (in Russian).

2. Sudakov K. V. Novye aktsenty klassicheskoy kontseptsii stressa (obzor) [New accents of the classic concept of stress (review)]. Bulleten’ eksperimental’ny biologii I meditsiny – Bulletin on experimental biology and medicine, 1997, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 121–130 (in Russian).

3. Borilkevich V. E. K voprosu o ponyatii fenomena “fi zicheskaya rabotosposobnost’’ [To the question of the concept of the phenomenon of “physical performance”]. Teoriya i praktika fi zicheskoy kul’tury – Theory and practice of physical culture, 1993, no. 9–10, pp. 18–19 (in Russian).

4. Kompleks khronorefl eksometricheskiy KHR-01 “Tsentr-3” [Complex hronorefl eksometrichesky KHR-01 «Center-3»]. Novaya meditsinskaya tekhnika [New medical equipment]. Moscow, MZ SSSR Publ., 1984. Pp. 18–19 (in Russian).

5. Atakhanov Sh. E., Robertson D. Ortostaticheskaya gipotoniya i vegetativnaya nedostatochnost’ (mekhanizmy i klassifi katsiya) [Orthostatic hypotension and autonomic failure (mechanisms and classifi cation)]. Kardiologiya – Cardiology, 1995, no. 3, pp. 13–43 (in Russian).

6. Yakhontov S. V., Yankovskaya I. V. Ortostaticheskoe testirovanie pri zanyatiyakh s otyagoshcheniyami [Orthostatic test when doing weight training]. Tomsk, TGPU Publ., 2006. 92 p. (in Russian).

7. Aminev G. A. Instruktsiya po interpretatsii vos’mitsvetovogo testa na osnove matematicheskoy obrabotki [Instructions on the interpretation of eight colour test based on mathematical processing]. Matematicheskie metody inzhenernoy psikhologii [Mathematical methods of engineering psychology]. Ufa, 1982. Pp 19–24 (in Russian).

8. Aleynikov A. F. Ustroystvo dlya izmereniya soprotivleniya: A. s. 93822269 (SSSR), MKI G01R 272 [Device for measuring the resistance of: A. a. 93822269 (USSR), IPC G01R 27 02], 1981 (in Russian).

9. Belotserkovskiy Z. B. Ergometricheskie i kardilogicheskie kriterii fi zicheskoy rabotosposobnosti y sportsmenov [Ergometer and cardiological criteria for physical performance of athletes]. Moscow, Sovetskiy sport Publ., 2005. 312 p. (in Russian).

10. Beresneva I. A. Otsenka adaptatsionnykh vozmozhnostey organizma shkol’nikov na osnove analiza VSR v pokoe i pri ortostaticheskoy probe: avtoref. dis. ... cand. biol. nauk [Estimation of adaptation abilities of pupils on the basis of the analysis of HRV at rest and during orthostatic test. Abstract of dis. cand. biol. sci.]. Moscow, 2000. 16 p. (in Russian).

11. Vishnevsky V. A. Fizicheskie uprazhneniya v ragulyatsii vegetativnogo balansa [Exercise in the regulation of autonomic balance]. Teoriya i praktika fi zicheskoy kul’tury – Theory and practice of physical culture, 2005, no. 5, p. 63 (in Russian).

yakhontov_s._v._238_244_3_156_2015.pdf ( 425.65 kB ) yakhontov_s._v._238_244_3_156_2015.zip ( 418.82 kB )

Issue: 3, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: THEORY AND METHODS OF TEACHING PHYSICAL CULTURE AND SPORTS

Pages: 238 — 244

Downloads: 1534

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU