Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.07.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №12 DEBATE AS A MEANS OF FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF BACHELORS IN THE FIELD OF TEACHER EDUCATION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

DEBATE AS A MEANS OF FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF BACHELORS IN THE FIELD OF TEACHER EDUCATION

Romadina Olga Grigoryevna, Solovyova Mariya Sergeyevna

Information About Author:

The article discusses the capabilities of the technology “Debate” in the formation of professional competencies of future teachers, substantiates and elaborates the scheme of inclusion of debates in the educational process. Implementation of the proposed scheme is shown by the example of the debate on the topic “The Study of Informatics in primary school: for and against”. At the final stage, the survey was conducted, which allowed to determine the attitude of students to technology “Debates”, the willingness of students to participate in such events and apply this technology in their professional activities. The use of debates allows to prepare a specialist who is able to work with different types of information, navigate the information space, justify his point of view. The above mentioned qualities should be common to modern teachers.

Keywords: bachelor, teacher education, professional competence, debates

References:

1. Slovar’ inostrannykh slov russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language] (in Russian). URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/dic_fwords/9220 (accessed 29.07.2016).

2. Klarin N. V. Innovatsii v mirovoy pedagogike: obucheniye na osnove issledovaniya, igr, diskussii (analiz zarubezhnogo opyta) [Innovation in the global pedagogy: learning through research, games, discussion (analysis of foreign experience)]. Riga, Pedagogicheskiy tsentr “Eksperiment” Publ., 1995. 176 p. (in Russian).

3. Korotkova M. V. Metodika provedeniya igr i diskussiy na uroke istorii [The technique of carrying out of games and discussions in history class]. Moscow, Vlados-press Publ., 2001. 256 p. (in Russian).

4. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.03.01 “Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye” (uroven’ bakalavriata), utverzhdennyy prikazom Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF ot 04.12.2015 no. 1426 [Federal state educational standard of higher education in the direction of training 44.03.01 teacher education (undergraduate level), approved by the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation from 04.12.2015 no. 1426]. (in Russian). URL: http://минобрнауки.рф/документы/7995 (accessed 29.07.2016).

5. Mogilev A. V., Pak N. I., Khenner E.K. Informatika: uchebnoye posobiye dlya stud. ped. vuzov [Computer science: manual for students of ped. universities]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2009. 848 p. (in Russian).

6. Lebedeva T. N. Formirovaniye algoritmicheskogo myshleniya shkol’nikov v protsesse obucheniya rekursivnym algoritmam v profi l’nykh klassakh sredney shkoly. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [The formation of algorithmic thinking of students in process of learning of recursive algorithms in profi le classes of high school. Diss. kand. ped. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 2005. 219 p. (in Russian).

7. Fokina O. S. Istoriko-pedagogicheskiy analiz stanovleniya ponyatiya kommunikativnoy kompetentsii studentov [The historical and pedagogical analysis of the formation of students’ communicative competence]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2016, vol. 3 (13), pp. 97–102 (in Russian).

romadina_o._g._94_99_12_177_2016.pdf ( 496.25 kB ) romadina_o._g._94_99_12_177_2016.zip ( 488.1 kB )

Issue: 12, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 12

Rubric: DIDACTICS OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Pages: 94 — 99

Downloads: 1200

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU