Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 22.05.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №12 THE PRINCIPLES OF SELECTION OF ACTIVE SPECIAL VOCABULARY IN PROFESSIONALLY FOCUSED GERMAN LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF LAW
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE PRINCIPLES OF SELECTION OF ACTIVE SPECIAL VOCABULARY IN PROFESSIONALLY FOCUSED GERMAN LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF LAW

Dementyeva Tamara Mikhaylovna

Information About Author:

The article deals with the problem of selection of active special vocabulary minimum for teaching German to the students of bachelor programmes studying Law. It gives the reason for usage of methodological and a number of linguistic principles of selection of active special lexical units taking into account the specifics of the subject and interdisciplinary language training, linguistic and extra-linguistic features of judicial language. The choice of special vocabulary is based on the analysis of domestic and foreign terminological research in the field of law. The methodical principles are determining in case of the choice of the corresponding types of the original German legal texts acting as a source of basic special vocabulary of the studied branches of law. In case of selection of active special lexicon, first of all, of all-legal, law branches related and interrelated legal terms the linguistic principles are fundamental: semantic, word-formation value and polysemy of lexical units.

Keywords: language of law, special vocabulary, legal terms, legal texts, branches of law

References:

1. Shchukin A. N. Metodika obucheniya rechevomu obshcheniyu na inostrannom yazyke. Uchebnoye posobiye dlya prepodavateley i studentov yazykovykh vuzov [Technique of training in speech communication in a foreign language. The education guidance for teachers and students of language higher education institutions]. Moscow, Ikar Publ., 2011. 454 p. (in Russian).

2. Khramtsova N. G. Pravovoy diskurs v teorii prava [Legal discourse in the theory of Law, Business in Law]. Biznes v zakone – Business in law, 2009, no. 1, pp. 80–84. (in Russian).

3. Hoffmann L. Kommunikationsmittel Fachsprache. Akademie-Verlag Berlin, 3. Afl ., 1987. 307 S.

4. Otto W. Amtsdeutsch heute, bürgernah und praxisnah. Stuttgart, München, Hannover, 1978. 200 S.

5. Otto W. Die Sprache als Verwaltungsmittel. Bayerische Verwaltungsblätter, 1978, 24, S. 481–486.

6. Otto W. Die Paradoxie einer Fachsprache. Der öffentliche Sprachgebrauch. Stuttgart, 1981. Bd. 2, S. 44–57.

7. Busse D. Textsorten des Bereichs Rechtswesen und Justiz. Hrsg.: Antos G., Brinker K., Heinemann W., Sager S. Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. 1. Handbuch. Berlin – New York, de Gruyter, 2000. S. 658–675.

8. Superanskaya A. V., Podol’skaya N. V., Vasil’yeva N. V. Obshchaya terminologiya: Terminologicheskaya deyatel’nost’ [General terminology: Terminological activity]. Moskow, Rus. yaz. Publ., 1993. 243 p. (in Russian).

9. Superanskaya A. V., Podol’skaya N. V., Vasil’yeva N. V. Obshchaya terminologiya: Voprosy teorii [General terminology: theory questions]. Moscow, Knizhnyy dom “LIBROKOM” Publ., 2012. 248 p. (in Russian).

10. Leychik V. M. Terminovedeniye: Predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology studies: Subject, methods, structure]. Moscow, Knizhnyy dom “LIBROKOM” Publ., 2014. 264 p. (in Russian).

11. Senkevich M. P. Stilistika nauchnoy rechi i literaturnoye redaktirovaniye nauchnykh proizvedeniy [Stylistics of the scientifi c speech and literary editing scientifi c works]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1976. 263 p. (in Russian).

12. Pigolkina A. S. (ed.). Yazyk zakona [Law language]. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ., 1990. 200 p. (in Russian).

13. Tolstik V. A. Problemy klassifi katsii yuridicheskoy terminologii [Problems of classifi cation of legal terminology]. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava – Current Problems of Economy and Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 176–182 (in Russian).

14. Müller-Tochtermann H. Zur Struktur der deutschen Rechtssprache. Muttersprache, 69, 1959, S. 84–86.

15. Tatarinov V. A. Teoriya terminovedeniya. Tom I. Teoriya termina: Istoriya i sovremennoye sostoyaniye [Theory of terminovedeniye. Volume I. Theory of the term: History and current state]. Moscow, Moskovskiy Litsey Publ., 1996. 311 p. (in Russian).

dementyeva_t._m._136_142_12_177_2016.pdf ( 429.94 kB ) dementyeva_t._m._136_142_12_177_2016.zip ( 423.3 kB )

Issue: 12, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 12

Rubric: DIDACTICS OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Pages: 136 — 142

Downloads: 1053

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU