Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.05.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №3 COMPOSITION TEXTS FROM THE UNIFIED STATE EXAMINATION FORMAT AS SOURCE BASE FOR THE RESEARCH OF THE AXIOLOGICAL COMPONENT OF THE CONTEMPORARY HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES’ WORLDVIEW
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COMPOSITION TEXTS FROM THE UNIFIED STATE EXAMINATION FORMAT AS SOURCE BASE FOR THE RESEARCH OF THE AXIOLOGICAL COMPONENT OF THE CONTEMPORARY HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES’ WORLDVIEW

Blagov Vladimir Vasilyevich

Information About Author:

The article explains the choice of the empirical material as the cognitive-discursive research of written texts – compositions, which is a component of the Russian Unified State Exam on the Russian language. The key point of the author is that the modeling potential of these speech patterns allows creating an invariant of a high school graduate worldview picture. The modeling direction within the given research gives a reconstruction of the represented in a system of certain frames worldview of the modern high school child in the aspect of the axiological characteristics. The text, reflecting in itself a fragment of the world picture is the richest material for the researcher wishing to analyze not only the originality of the author’s position on this or that question, his or her creative potential, but also a system of the author’s signature style evaluations, and also priorities in a foreshortening of axiological preferences. It is noted that the formation of the high school graduate worldview is carried out in difficult historical and socio-cultural conditions, on the one hand because of the economic and political changes which happened during the last decades in Russia and the world, on the other hand because of the world values shift in the society and, as a result, contradictions in an axiological paradigm of different generations representatives. The conclusion is that, despite the presence of templates affiliation in the processes of writing and evaluation of these works by the experts, the graduates compositions accurately present the world values, that are determined primarily by the age and the social factors.

Keywords: picture of the world, worldview, world values, worldview axiological parameter, psychology, writing, Russian Unified State Exam

References:

1. Kuryyanovich A. V. Еpistolyarnaya kartina mira: k voprosu opredeleniya ponyatiya [Epistolary picture of the world: to question the notion of defi ning the specifi cs]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 2 (143), pp. 16–20 (in Russian).

2. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar’-tezaurus [Communicative stylistics of the text: dictionary-thesaurus]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2008. 384 p. (in Russian).

3. Shapovalenko I. V. Vozrastnaya psikhologiya (Psikhologiya razvitiya i vozrastnaya psikhologiya) [Age psychology (Psychology of development and age psychology)]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2005. 349 p. (in Russian).

4. Vozrastnaya psikhologiya. Yunita 3: Kharakteristika psikhologicheskikh osobennostey podrostkov i yunoshey [Age psychology. Unit 3: Characteristic of psychological features of teenagers and young men]. Razrab. Yu. V. Aleksandrovoy. Moscow, Sovremennyy gumanitarnyy institut Publ., 1999. 349 p. (in Russian).

5. Rezanova Z. I. Yazykovaya kartina mira: vzglyad na yavleniye skvoz’ prizmy termina-metafory [Language picture of the world: a view at the phenomenon through the prism of the term-metaphor]. Materialy Vserossiyskoy mezhdistsiplinarnoy shkoly molodykh uchyonykh “Kartina mira: yazyk, fi losofi ya, nauka” (1–3 noyabrya 2001) [Materials of the All-Russian interdisciplinary school of young scientists “Picture of world: language, philosophy, science” (on November 1–3, 2001)]. Ed. prof. Z. I. Rezanova. Tomsk, 2002. Pp. 28–34 (in Russian).

6. Khukhlaeva O. V. Psikhologiya podrostka: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Psychology of the teenager: textbook for students of higher educational institutions]. 3-e izd., ster. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2008. 160 p. (in Russian).

7. Kon I. S. Psikhologiya ranney yunosti: kniga dlya uchitelya [Psychology of early youth: The book for the teacher]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1989. 255 p. (in Russian).

blagov_v._v._83_88_3_168_2016.pdf ( 426.87 kB ) blagov_v._v._83_88_3_168_2016.zip ( 420.32 kB )

Issue: 3, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: MODERN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

Pages: 83 — 88

Downloads: 1107

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU