Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 22.05.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №3 MEANS OF REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT“VICTIM” IN F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY’S NOVEL “CRIME AND PUNISHMENT”
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

MEANS OF REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT“VICTIM” IN F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY’S NOVEL “CRIME AND PUNISHMENT”

Smirnov Jaroslav Viktorovich

Information About Author:

The article deals with the analysis of the means of representation of a concept “victim” in the image of Rodion Raskolnikov in F. M. Dostoyevsky’s novel “Crime and punishment”. The concept “victim” in the text of the novel of F.M. Dostoyevsky “Crime and punishment” is realized at various structural and semantic levels. An image of Raskolnikov consistently embodies in the novel various semantic aspects of a concept “victim” (the victim of the fashionable theory and own ambitions, generation as the victim of a critical era, etc.). The principles of polyphony when the opinion of the reader is created indirectly through the relation of characters of the novel shown in the speech and thoughts become the most significant for formation of reception.

Keywords: F. M. Dostoevsky, “Crime and punishment”, Rodion Raskolnikov, image, hero, axiology, concept, victim, victimology, polyphonism, reception

References:

1. Koshechko A. N. Viktimologichesky diskurs v “Dnevnike pisatelya” F. M. Dostoevskogo kak opyt ekzistentsial’noy refl eksii [Victimological discourse in “Тhe Diary of a writer” F. M. Dostoevsky as an experience of existential refl ection]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2010, vol. 8 (98), pp. 80–86 (in Russian).

2. Tyupa V. I. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta [Analysis of literary text]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2009. 336 p. (in Russian).

3. Bakhtin M. M. Avtor i geroy v esteticheskoy deyatel’nosti [Author and hero in aesthetic activity]. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. 422 p. Pp. 7–180 (in Russian).

4. Koshechko A. N. Dostoevsky i apostasiya: k voprosu ob atributivnykh kharakteristikakh [Dostoevsky and apostasy: the question of attributive characteristics]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 11 (139), pp. 23–31 (in Russian).

5. Belov S. V. Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo “Prestupleniye i nakazaniye” [A novel by F. M. Dostoyevsky “Crime and punishment”], Comments. 2nd ed. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1984. 240 p.

6. Al’tman M. S. Dostoevskyy. Po vekham imen [Dostoevsky. By milestones names]. Saratov, Izd-vo Saratovskogo un-ta Publ., 1975. 280 p.

7. Böhm A. L. Lichnye imena u Dostoevskogo [Personal names in Dostoevsky]. About Dostojevskem. Sbornik stati a materialu. Praha, 1972, pp. 244–286.

8. Toporov V. N. O strukture romana Dostoevskogo v svyazi s arkhaichnymi skhemami mifologicheskogo myshleniya (“Prestupleniye i nakazaniye”) [On the structure of Dostoevsky’s novel in connection with the archaic schemes of mythological thinking (“Crime and punishment”)]. Structure of Texts and Semiotics of Culture. Paris, Mouton, 1973, pp. 225–302.

9. Dostoevsky F. M. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy v 30 t. [Complete works in 30 v.] Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1986.

smirnov_j._v._125_129_3_168_2016.pdf ( 431.24 kB ) smirnov_j._v._125_129_3_168_2016.zip ( 424.79 kB )

Issue: 3, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: RUSSIAN AND FORREIGN LITERATURE OF THE XIX CENTURY

Pages: 125 — 129

Downloads: 1145

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU