Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 15.11.2025
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №10 STYLISTIC DEVICE OF DEFEATED EXPECTANCY AS A SPECIFIC COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGY IN INTERNET MEMES
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

STYLISTIC DEVICE OF DEFEATED EXPECTANCY AS A SPECIFIC COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGY IN INTERNET MEMES

Kanashina Svetlana Valeryevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-9-14

Information About Author:

Kanashina S. V., Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) (pr. Vernadskogo, 76, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454). E-mail: svetlanakanashina@yandex.ru

The article looks at the stylistic device of defeated expectancy in the internet meme as a popular internet communication phenomenon. The relevance of the topic is proved by the lack of research concerning this device in the field of internet communication. The aim of the article is to analyse and describe the stylistic device of defeated expectancy in internet memes. The stylistic device of defeated expectancy is often observed in internet memes which is justified by their genre features (appeal to the reader, humour, irony). This device is used as a specific communicative strategy aimed at involving the reader who is ready to encounter the stylistic device of defeated expectancy in internet memes. It performs the following functions: it serves as a tool for creating humour, intrigue, opposition and paradox in internet memes. This device may also perform some of the above mentioned functions simultaneously. In contrast to fiction this device is not motivated in internet memes by the author’s literary intentions but by his or her aspiration to attract the reader’s attention. The stylistic device of defeated expectancy can be defined as a discursive characteristic of internet memes and is motivated by the humorous, light-hearted genre of this internet phenomenon.

Keywords: internet meme, defeated expectancy, precedent phenomenon, humorous effect, paradox

References:

1. Leont’eva T. I. Sposoby sozdaniya effekta obmanutogo ozhidaniya v literaturnom proizvedenii [The ways of creating the stylistic device of defeated expectancy in fiction]. Trudy Dal’nevostochnogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Far Eastern State Technical University, 2007, no. 146, pp. 91–94 (in Russian).

2. Karpukhina T. P. Effekt obmanutogo ozhidaniya pri vzaimodeystvii morfemnogo povtora i sintaksicheskogo parallelizma (na materiale angloyazychnoy khudozhestvennoy prozy) [The effect of defeated expectancy created by the interrelation of morphemic repetition and syntactical parallelism in English artistic prose]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 3 (131), pp. 22–27 (in Russian).

3. Abramovskikh E. V. Effekt “obmanutogo chitatel’skogo ozhidaniya” v narrativnoy strukture povesti L. Ulitskoy “Skvoznaya liniya” [The effect of the disappointed readerly expectation in the narrative structure of L. Ulitskaa’s story ‘Skvoznaya liniya’]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik – The New Philological Bulletin, 2013, no. 4 (27), pp. 104–118 (in Russian).

4. Asmus N. G. Pretsedentnost’ internet-memov [Precedent character of internet memes]. Slovo, vyskazyvaniye, tekst v kognitivnom, pragmaticheskom i kul’turologicheskom aspektakh. Materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Word, utterance, text in cognitive, pragmatic and cultural aspects: materials of the VIII International Scientific Conference], 2016. Pp. 165–168 (in Russian).

5. Arshinskaya N. A. Problema vospriyatiya i interpretatsii internet-memov [The problem of perception in the interpretation of internet memes]. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologiy – Modern trends in the development of science and technology, 2015, no. 9-4, pp. 10–16 (in Russian).

6. Krotova A. G. Stilisticheskiy potentsial internet-memov v mediatekstakh [The stylistic potential of the internet memes in media texts]. Vek informatsii. Media v sovremennom mire. Peterburgskiye chteniya: materialy 56-go mezhdunar. foruma, Sankt-Peterburg, 13–14 apr. 2017 g.: v 2 t. [The age of information. Media in the modern world. Petersburg readings: materials of the 56-th international forum, Saint Petersburg, April 13–14, 2017: in 2 volumes]. Saint Petersburg, Vyssh. shk. Publ., 2017. Vol. 2, no. 2. Pp. 42–43 (in Russian).

7. Gutorenko L. S. Pretsedentnost’ v kreolizovannykh tekstakh komicheskogo kharaktera v sovremennoy internet-kommunikatsii (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Precedence in creolized texts of comic nature in the contemporary internet-communication (by the material of English)]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2017, no. 3 (69), part 3, pp. 82–85 (in Russian).

8. Anikina T. V. Internet-mem v usloviyakh sovremennoy kommunikatsii [Internet meme in modern communication]. Novaya nauka: opyt, traditsii, innovatsii – New Science: Experience, Traditions, Innovations, 2016, no. 8-2, pp. 54–58 (in Russian).

9. Shabanova A. A., Glazacheva T. P. “Obmanutoye ozhidaniye” kak osnova vozniknoveniya yumoristicheskogo effekta v angloyazychnykh yumoristicheskikh tekstakh [“Frustrated expectations” as a basis for appearance of comic effect in English humorous texts]. Simbirskiy nauchny vestnik – Simbirsk Scientific Herald, 2012, no. 4 (10), pp. 188–191 (in Russian).

10. Kabanina O. L. Obmanutoye ozhidaniye i ego regulyativnye vozmozhnosti (na materiale stikhotvoreniya M. I. Tsvetaevoy “Zhiv i zdorov!”) [Deceived expectations and its regulatory opportunities (data: Marina Tsvetaeva’s poem “Safe and sound!”)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 10 (138), pp. 214–216 (in Russian).

kanashina_s._v._9_14_10_187_2017.pdf ( 676.57 kB ) kanashina_s._v._9_14_10_187_2017.zip ( 652.41 kB )

Issue: 10, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 9 — 14

Downloads: 1923

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU