Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.07.2025
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №10 INTERCULTURAL POLITICAL PROGNOSIS: REALIZATION OF CONFLICT AND CONGRUOUS DISCOURSES’ MODELS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

INTERCULTURAL POLITICAL PROGNOSIS: REALIZATION OF CONFLICT AND CONGRUOUS DISCOURSES’ MODELS

Koshkarova Natalya Nikolaevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-15-20

Information About Author:

Koshkarova N. N., South-Ural State University (ul. Lenina, 76, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454080). E-mail: nkoshka@rambler.ru

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the conflict and congruous discourses’ components which are relevant to the genre of intercultural political prognosis. The latter is viewed not as a form of the analytical article but as an independent genre with appropriate characteristic features. In the framework of the prognosis functioning in the media landscape the following genre forms are singled out: article-prognosis and interview-prognosis. The above-mentioned genre varieties correlate to the genre and stylistic unit of the conflict and congruous discourses’ models. Within the scope of the functional and axilological unit of the discourses under study the prognostic, evaluative and preventive functions of the prognosis are described. The speech means which mark the prognostic utterance in the text are analyzed. The definition of conflict and congruous types of discourse, of the intercultural political area are given. The author comes to the conclusion the intercultural political prognosis is more likely to be described as belonging to the conflict type of discourse as the genre under study doesn’t represent the facts but determines the tendencies and perspectives of this or that phenomenon’s development. And only time and the real development of the events can show whether the prognosis was true-to-fact or not.

Keywords: intercultural political prognosis, conflict discourse, congruous discourse, prognostic utterance, genre

References:

1. Koshkarova N. N. Konfliktnyy i kooperativnyy tipy russkoyazychnogo diskursa v mezhkul’turnom politicheskom prostranstve. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Conflict and congruous types of the Russian discourse in the intercultural political area. Diss. dr. of philol. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 2015. 441 p. (in Russian).

2. Kositskaya F. L. Rechevoy zhanr kak edinitsa kontrastivnogo analiza [Speech genre as the contrastive analysis unit]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2006, vol. 4 (55), pp. 101–105 (in Russian).

3. Dement’ev V. V. Zhanry novykh sfer obshcheniya [Genres of the new communication spheres]. Sovremennaya rechevyya kommunikatsiya: novye diskursivnye praktiki [Modern speech communication: new discursive practicies]. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2011. Pp. 19–36 (in Russian).

4. Dement’ev V. V. “Rasshiryayushchaya” i “suzhayushchaya” tendentsii v opredelenii rechevogo zhanra [“Widening” and “narrowing” tendencies in the speech genre definition]. Sovremennaya rechevaya kommunikatsiya: strategii i zhanry [Modern speech communication: strategies and genres]. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2009. Pp. 17–29 (in Russian).

5. Kur’yanovich A. V. Teoreticheskiye voprosy izucheniya epistolyariya v sovremennoy lingvistike [Theoretical questions of studying of epistolary genre in modern linguistics]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2013. 220 p. (in Russian).

6. Fedosyuk M. Yu. Nereshonnye voprosy teorii rechevykh zhanrov [Unsolved questions in the theory of speech genres]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Topics in the study of language, 1997, no. 5, pp. 102–120 (in Russian).

7. Medvetskiy A. Osobennosti podgotovki i ispol’zovaniya analiticheskikh materialov [Peculiarities of preparing and using analytical materials] (in Russian). URL: http://www.csef.ru/index.php/ru/component/csef/project/499-analiticheskaya-deyatelnost-opyt-rossijskikh-i-zarubezhnykh-spetsialistov/6-raznoe/4562-osobennosti-podgotovki-i-ispolzhtml (accessed 14 May 2017).

8. Tertychny A. A. Analiticheskaya zhurnalistika: ucheb. posobiye dlya studentov vuzov [Analytical journalism: textbook]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2010. 352 p. (in Russian).

9. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii: vyzovy, strategiya, prognoz [Russia’s foreign policy challenges, strategy, prognosis] (in Russian). URL: http://csef.ru/ru/politica-i-geopolitica/326/vneshnyaya-politika-rossii-vyzovy-strategiya-prognoz-6429 (accessed 14 May 2017).

10. Gosduma-2016: interv’yu-prognoz Konstantina Kostina [State Duma-2016: interview-prognosis by Konstantin Kostin] (in Russian). URL: http://nn-now.ru/mainnews/gosduma-2016-intervyu-prognoz-konstantina-kostina/ (accessed 14 May 2017).

11. Makroekonomika-2017: prognoz ot vedushchikh ekonomistov Ukrainy [Macroeconomics-2017: prognosis from leading Ukraine’s economists] (in Russian). URL: http://forbes.net.ua/selfeducation/reports/1425507-makroekonomika-2017-prognoz-ot-vedushchih-ekonomistov-ukrainy (accessed 14 May 2017).

koshkarova_n._n._15_20_10_187_2017.pdf ( 415.29 kB ) koshkarova_n._n._15_20_10_187_2017.zip ( 407.63 kB )

Issue: 10, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 15 — 20

Downloads: 1175

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU