Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 22.05.2025
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №10 FRENCH ECOLOGICAL DISCOURSE AND ITS GENRE DIFFERENTIATION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

FRENCH ECOLOGICAL DISCOURSE AND ITS GENRE DIFFERENTIATION

Kositskaya Faina Leonidovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-44-47

Information About Author:

Kositskaya F. L., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: fainak@list.ru

The development of the world technological progress, the population increase, irrational use of the Earth’s natural resources have led to the emergence of serious problems in the sphere of ecology, therefore in particular, the preservation of natural environment of the society has became one of the most important issues for mankind. The emergence of the ecological discourse is referred to the number of symbolic culture phenomena and it is closely related to the formation of ecological consciousness. The communicative space of the ecological discourse is the interaction of legislative (legal) discourse, scientific, political, advertising ecological discourse, academic (teaching) ecological discourse, ecological media discourse. The ecological discourse is characterized by the polyphonic characteristic inclusions of social, pharmaceutical, chemical, technical, agricultural (agrarian), medical, veterinary, religious discourses. This discourse belongs to a mixed type of discourse, that have the features of institutional and personal discourses. The ecological discourse is a complex discursive, multi-dimensional, diverse construction, that can be attributed to the hybrid, polycode discourses. The French national ecological discourse is a part of the global environmental discourse. The characteristic features of the ecological discourse are professionality, termhood, scientificity, accuracy, clarity, cliché character, communication skills, creativity, sense of duty, argumentativeness, alertness, an emotional component, associativity, polyappealability. The complex discursive nature of the ecological discourse has generated a variety of genre forms.

Keywords: ecology, discourse, environmental protection, environmental problems, speech genre

References:

1. Sozinov A. V. Ekologicheskiy diskurs: global’nyy, natsional’nyy i regional’nyy urovni. Istoriko-kul’turologicheskiy analiz. Avtoref. dis. kand. kulturol. nauk [The ecological discourse: global, national and regional levels. Historical and cultural analysis. Abstract of thesis сand. cultural. sci.]. Krasnodar, 2011. 22 p. (in Russian).

2. Karaulov Yu. N., Petrov V. V. Ot grammatiki teksta k kognitivnoy teorii diskursa [From the grammar of the text to the cognitive theory of discourse]. Deyk T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Deyk T. A. van. Language, Cognition. Communication]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. Pp. 5–11 (in Russian).

3. Arutyunova N. D. Diskurs [Discourse]. Bol’shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Yazykoznanie [Large encyclopedia. Linguistics]. Moscow, 1998. Pp. 136–137 (in Russian).

4. Golodnov A. V. Ritoricheskiy metadiskurs: osnovaniya pragmalingvisticheskogo modelirovaniya i sotsiokul’turnoy realizatsii (na materiale sovremennogo nemetskogo yazyka) [Rhetorical metadiscourse: the basis of Pragmalinguistic modelling and socio-cultural realization (on the material of the modern German language)]. Saint Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 2011. 344 p. (in Russian).

5. Krasnykh V. V. Struktura kommunikatsii v svete lingvo-kognitivnogo podkhoda (kommunikativnyy akt, diskurs, tekst). Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [The communication structure in the light of the linguistic-cognitive approach (communicative act, discourse, text). Abstract of thesis dr. of philol. sci.]. Moscow, 1999. 45 p. (in Russian).

6. Deyk T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language, Cognition. Communication]. Transl. from English. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 308 p. (in Russian).

7. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2004. 390 p. (in Russian).

8. Kositskaya F. L. Pis’menno-rechevye zhanry reklamnogo diskursa mody v aspekte mezhyazykovoy kontrastivnosti (na materiale frantsuzskikh i russkikh katalogov mody). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Writing and speech genres of the advertising discourse of fashion in the aspect of interlingual contrastiveness (on the material of French and Russian fashion catalogs). Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2005. 269 p. (in Russian).

9. Zaytseva A. V. Tipologiya tekstov ekologicheskogo diskursa FRG. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Text typology of the ecological discourse in Germany. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Smolensk, 2014. 253 p. (in Russian).

10. Pupkova A. V. Kharakteristika ekologicheskogo diskursa v sovremennom frantsuzskom yazyke [The characteristic of ecological discourse in modern French language]. Vestnik of MSLU – Moscow State Linguistics University Bulletin, 2009, no. 566, pp. 108–117 (in Russian).

11. Oster P. Dictionnaire des citations françaises. Le Robert. Paris, 2006. 960 p.

kositskaya_f._l._44_47_10_187_2017.pdf ( 376.26 kB ) kositskaya_f._l._44_47_10_187_2017.zip ( 369.17 kB )

Issue: 10, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 44 — 47

Downloads: 1487

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU