Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.07.2025
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №10 AMERICAN MASS MEDIA TEXT AS A SPHERE OF REALIZATION OF NEOLOGISMS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

AMERICAN MASS MEDIA TEXT AS A SPHERE OF REALIZATION OF NEOLOGISMS

Snisar Anastasia Yurievna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-112-117

Information About Author:

Snisar A. Yu., National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (pr. Lenina, 30, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: borel@mail.ru

Rapid growth of neologisms in the American English causes the relevance of this research. Current linguistic researches (A. R. Nagiyeva, S. N. Shidlovskaya, I. Yu. Chernysh, Yu. E. Shadrina, E. S. Razheva, O. A. Guryanova, A. M. Khayrullina, E. A. Hudinshai other) don’t cover all functional features of neologisms in the modern American English. It is supposed that exactly American mass media sphere is one of the main producing zones of neologisms. But nowadays there isn`t complex research of the American mass media sphere in terms of existing and functioning neologisms there. This fact causes necessity to investigate the main reasons for creation of neologisms in the American mass media sphere and to define their functional status there. Theoretical results of this research contribute to systematization of the existing knowledge of the nature of neologisms. Practical significance of the research is that it can be used as a base for lexicographic fascination of the neologisms which have appeared in XXI century. It is shown that mass media is one of the main spheres where neologism appear and function. Most of them are a result of appearance of new forms of Internet resources, equipment and solutions. There are in the research examples of neologism with the explanation of their meaning and peculiarities of realization in the American mass media sphere. It is stressed that most of neologisms are connotative words, which are used to achieve some effect (pragmatical, ironical, actional, etc.).

Keywords: neologisms, mass media text, neology, American English

References:

1. Knyazev N.A. Ob issledovanii protsessov neologizatsii v angliyskom yazyke s pozitsiy sovremennoy nauchnoy paradigmy [About a research of processes of a neologization in English from positions of a modern scientific paradigm]. Kognitivno-semanticheskiye issledovaniya predlozheniya i teksta [Cognitive-semantic research of sentence and text]. Pyatigorsk, PSLU Publ., 2014. Pp. 59–61 (in Russian).

2. Vinogradov V. S. Vvedeniye v perevodovedeniye [Introduction to theory of translation]. Moscow, IOSO RAO Publ., 2001. 221 p. (in Russian).

3. Cherepanova I. S. Osobennosti vozniknoveniya i funktsionirovaniya sovremennoy molodezhnoy leksiki (na primere nemetskogo, angliyskogo i russkogo yazykov) [Features of emergence and functioning of modern youth lexicon (on the example of the German, English and Russian languages)]. Ot rodnogo poroga – k mirovym tsennostyam. Sb. materialov nauch. konf. [From the native threshold - to world values: collection of materials of scientific conference]. Surgut, 2002 (in Russian). URL: http://docs.podelise.ru/docs/index- 6773.html (accessed 15 May 2017).

4. Voloshin Yu. K. Novoobrazovaniya i sobstvenno neologizmy sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [New words and actually neologisms of modern English. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 1971. 16 p. (in Russian).

5. Gural’nik T. A. Amerikanskiye realii-neologizmy i problemy perevoda [American realities neologisms and problems of the translation]. Penza, 1999 (in Russian).

6. Budagov R. A. Chto takoye razvitiye i sovershenstvovaniye yazyka [What is the development and improvement of language]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 264 p. (in Russian).

7. Festschrift für Hans Marchand. Hrsg. H. E.Brekle und W. Lipka, Heidelberg, 1968.

8. Kubryakova E. S. Nominativnyy aspekt rechevoy deyatelnosti [Nominative aspect of speech activity]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1986. 215 p. (in Russian).

9. Kotelova N. Z. Protsessy neologizatsii v russkom yazyke poslednikh desyatiletiy [Processes of a neologization in Russian of the last decades]. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte. Vol. 63. Leipzig, 1987. 59 p. (in Russian).

10. Lopatin V. V. Rozhdeniye slova: neologizmy i okkazional’nyye obrazovaniya [Word birth: neologisms and occasional derivations]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 150 p. (in Russian).

11. Mistyuk T.L. Tendentsii semanticheskoy evolyutsii sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (na baze neologicheskoy metaforizatsii obshcheupotrebitel’noy leksiki v gazetnoy publitsistike 1992–1997 godov). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Tendencies of semantic evolution of modern Russian (on the basis of a neological metaforization of common lexicon in newspaper journalism of 1992-1997. Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Novosibirsk, 1998. 148 p. (in Russian).

12. Serebrennikov B. A. Obshcheye yazykoznaniye [General Linguistics]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Publ., 1970. Pp. 13–26 (in Russian).

13. Rozen E. V. Kak poyavlyayutsya slova. Nemetskaya leksika: istoriya i sovremennost’ [How new words appear. German lexicon: History and Present]. Moscow, Mart Publ., 2000. 156 p. (in Russian).

14. Zabotkina V. I. K voprosu o printsipakh tipologii neologizmov v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [To the question of the principles of typology of neologisms in modern English]. Derivatsiya v norme i terminosistemakh [Derivation in norm and terminology]. Vladivostok, 1990. Pp. 120–128 (in Russian).

15. Khakham L. A. Osnovnyye tipy novoobrazovaniy v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke i sposoby ikh perevoda na russkiy yazyk. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The main types of neologisms in modern English and ways of their translation into Russian. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 1970. 24 p. (in Russian).

16. Crystal D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford, 1985. 572 p.

snisar_a._y._112_117_10_187_2017.pdf ( 382.25 kB ) snisar_a._y._112_117_10_187_2017.zip ( 373.95 kB )

Issue: 10, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: GERMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 112 — 117

Downloads: 1393

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU