Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 25.05.2025
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №11 DIRECTIONS OF EDUCATION OF VALUE STRUCTURE OF DAILY AND EXISTENTIAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

DIRECTIONS OF EDUCATION OF VALUE STRUCTURE OF DAILY AND EXISTENTIAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY

Koshechko Anastasiya Nikolaevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-11-194-202

Information About Author:

Koshechko A. N., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: Nastyk78@mail.ru

The article presents the analysis of the initial stage of the formation of existential consciousness of Dostoyevsky. The family sphere finds orientation of parents of the writer to values of traditional family and patriarchal model of education. Orientation to traditional values in Dostoyevsky’ family is implemented at the level of the principles of interpersonal interaction (monogamy, possession of many children, respect and esteem for seniors) and priorities in upbringing of children (reliance on education and diligence, schooling to truth, decency, responsibility, love for the country and national culture). The research of the facts of Dostoyevsky’s childhood allows to allocate three interconnected directions of education of the valuable sphere of his daily and existential consciousness: emotional, semantic, religious. United in a single fundamental event by the fate of the writer, they serve as peculiar symptoms of awareness of the existence by Dostoyevsky the child, bound indissolubly to light and a word as in the ways of perceiving being and self-realization of oneself in it. Of particular importance in this process – in addition to family reading and lessons in the Law of God, pilgrimage trips to the Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra – is training in boarding schools, the first experience of Dostoevsky’s clash with the outside world, the shock of meeting with his own self, an independent attempt to realize “non-alibi in being” through the acquisition of the ability to speak on its own behalf. During this period reading becomes a way of formation of a semantic resource of his personality, a way of a seclusion and reflection in boarding house. Understanding of himself in life, procedurally mastered in the childhood, forms the the value-semantic sphere of daily and existential consciousness of Dostoyevsky and is implemented in text activity. Experience of own childhood as a moral guideline will become for the writer a criterion of differentiation “before” and “now”, “family” and “casual family” as different spiritual and moral ways of existence. Systematic destruction of the spiritual bases of family, neglect to the performance of parental and filial responsibilities, education of cynicism, indifference, denial leads to loss of sense of existence. Semantic capacity of the image of family and behavioural family tradition are the basis for formation of the image of the world in Dostoyevsky’s “Writer`s diary” and novels of the Great Pentateuch. From the idea of family as a phenomenon of the Russian life a positive program of overcoming spiritual crisis of mankind is built in his works.

Keywords: F. M. Dostoyevsky, author, existential consciousness, attributive characteristics, values, Orthodoxy, consciousness, childhood, teenager, education, reflection, “a boundary situation”, “the current procedurality”, “casual family”, “Teenager”, “A Writer`s

References:

1. Nechaeva V. S. Ranniy Dostoevskiy. 1821–1849 [Early Dostoyevsky. 1821–1849]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 288 p. (in Russian).

2. Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972–1986 (in Russian).

3. Bykov P. Vyderzhki iz avtobiografi i F. M. Dostoevskogo [Excerpts from the autobiography of F. M. Dostoyevsky]. Krasnaya gazeta. 1925, vech. vyp., no. 47, 24 fevralya (in Russian).

4. Dostoevskiy A. M. Vospominaniya [Memoirs]. Leningrad, Izd-vo pisateley v Leningrade Publ., 1930 (in Russian).

5. Letopis’ zhizni i tvorchestva F. M. Dostoevskogo. V 3 t. (1821–1881). T. 1: 1821–1864 [Chronicle of life and F. M. Dostoyevsky’s creativity. In 3 volumes (1821–1881)]. Compl. I. D. Yakubovich, T. I. Ornatskaya. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House). Ed. N. F. Budanova. St Petersburg, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 1993. 530 p. (in Russian).

6. Grossman L. P. Seminariy po Dostoevskomu. Materialy, bibliografi ya, kommentarii [Seminaries according to Dostoyevsky. Materials, bibliography, comments]. Moscow, Petrograd, 1922 (in Russian).

7. Biografi ya, pis’ma i zametki iz zapisnoy knizhki T. 1. [The biography, letters and notes from the notebook. Vol. 1]. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy F. M. Dostoevskogo [Complete Works of F. M. Dostoevsky]. St. Petersburg, 1883. (in Russian).

8. Fedor Mikhaylovich Dostoevskiy v portretakh, illyustratsiyakh, dokumentakh [Fedor Mikhaylovich Dostoyevsky in portraits, illustrations, documents]. Ed. by V. S. Nechaeva. Moscow, 1972. 447 p. (in Russian).

9. Grigorovich D. V. Literaturnye vospominaniya [Literary memoirs]. Moscow, 1961. 215 p. (in Russian).

koshechko_a._n._194_202_11_188_2017.pdf ( 501.06 kB ) koshechko_a._n._194_202_11_188_2017.zip ( 493.66 kB )

Issue: 11, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: CREATIVE WORKS OF THE SIBERIAN WRITERS OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE XIX CENTURY – THE BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURY FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN THE CONTEXT OF LITERARY TRADITIONS

Pages: 194 — 202

Downloads: 1040

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU