SOME MODERN APPROACHES TO SCIENTIFIC TEXT STUDY
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-54-60
The modern approaches to scientific text study are based on the theoretical and methodological principles of functional stylistics, which are related to the need to study the text in its systemic speech organization, due to extralinguistic factors of scientific communication. New promising approaches to the development of the theory of the scientific text are: activity, transdisciplinary, idiostylistic, cognitive-discursive and discursive-stylistic, evidencing the expansion of the problems of modern functional stylistics. The activity approach corresponds with the structure of the cognitive process reflected in the text, in the unity of the three elements: subject, object and cognitive activity of the subject. The transdisciplinary approach is conditioned by the interaction of stylistics with a number of related sciences: psychology, epistemology, logic, etc. This interaction makes it possible to reveal the mechanisms of the generation of a scientific text and its perception by the addressee. The idiostylistic approach is aimed at studying the individual style of the scientist, determined by the peculiarities of his thinking. For the cognitive-discursive approach, it is characteristic to identify text structures that represent the picture of the scientist’s world. The discourse-stylistic approach is expedient to use on the basis of similarity of concepts «style» and «discourse». The approaches considered provide new complementary knowledge about the scientific text.
Keywords: scientific text, stylistics of scientific speech, new approaches to scientific text study, activity approach, transdisciplinary approach, idiostylistic approach, cognitive-discursive approach, discourse-stylistic approach
References:
1. Kozhina M. N. O spetsifike khudozhestvennoy i nauchnoy rechi v aspekte funktsional’noy stilistiki [On the specificity of artistic and scientific speech in functional stylistics aspect]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 1966. 213 p. (in Russian).
2. Kozhina M. N. O rechevoy sistemnosti nauchnogo stilya sravnitel’no s nekotorymi drugimi [On the speech systemic nature of the scientific style compared with some other]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 1972. 396 p. (in Russian).
3. Ocherki istorii nauchnogo stilya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVIII–XX vv.: v 3 t. T. II. Stilistika nauchnogo teksta (obshchiye parametry) [Essays on the history of the Russian literary language scientific style of the XVIII–XX centuries. In 3 vol. Vol. II. The scientific text stylistics (general parameters)]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 1996. Part 1. 380 p. (in Russian).
4. Bazhenova E. A., Kotyurova M. P. Permskaya nauchnaya shkola funktsional’noy stilistiki [Perm functional stylistics scientific school]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya – Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 2016, no. 2 (34), pp. 140–148 (in Russian).
5. Kotyurova M. P. Ob ekstralingvisticheskikh osnovaniyakh smyslovoy struktury nauchnogo teksta (Funktsional’no-stilisticheskiy aspekt) [On extra linguistic grounds of the scientific text semantic structure (Functional-stylistic aspect)]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk University Publ., 1988. 170 p. (in Russian).
6. Kotyurova M. P. Vyrazheniye epistemicheskoy situatsii v periferiynykh tekstakh tselogo proizvedeniya [The epistemic situation representation in the peripheral texts of the whole work]. Ocherki istorii nauchnogo stilya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVIII–XX vv.: v 3 t. T. II. Stilistika nauchnogo teksta (obshchiye parametry) [Essays on the history of the Russian literary language scientific style of the XVIII–XX centuries: in 3 volumes. Vol. II. The scientific text stylistics (general parameters)]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 1996. Part 1, pp. 341–369 (in Russian).
7. Kotyurova M. P., Solovyeva N. V. Sovremennyy nauchnyy tekst (skvoz’ prizmu diskursivnykh izmeneniy) [Modern scientific text (through the discursive changes prism)]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 2017. 204 p. (in Russian).
8. Kotyurova M. P., Bazhenova E. A. Kul’tura nauchnoy rechi: Tekst i yego redaktirovaniye [Scientific speech culture: Text and its editing]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2008. 280 p. (in Russian).
9. Kotyurova M. P. Stilistika nauchnoy rechi: ucheb. posobie [Scientific speech Stylistics: textbook]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2012. 240 p. (in Russian).
10. Chernyavskaya V. E. Nauchnyy diskurs: Vydvizheniye rezul’tata kak kommunikativnaya i yazykovaya problema [Scientific discourse: the result representation as a communicative and linguistic problem]. Moscow, LENAND Publ., 2017. 144 p. (in Russian).
11. Kotyurova M. P., Tikhomirova L. S., Solovyeva N. V. Idiostilistika nauchnoy rechi. Nashi predstavleniya o rechevoy individual’nosti uchenogo [Scientific speech idiostylistics. Our ideas about the scientist verbal individuality]. Perm, Perm university Publ., 2011. 394 p. (in Russian).
12. Bolotnova N. S. O novykh tendentsiyakh sovremennoy stilistiki khudozhestvennogo stilya [About new trends in modern artistic text stylistics]. Rechevedeniye: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy. Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf., posvyashchennoy yubileyu prof. M. N. Kozhinoy (Perm, 16–20 noyabrya 2010 g.) [Speech studies: current state and prospects. Materials of the international scientific conference dedicated to the anniversary of prof. M. N. Kozhina (Perm, November 16–20, 2010)]. Perm, Perm. University Publ., 2010, pp. 463–468 (in Russian).
13. Bazhenova E. A. Nauchnyy tekst v aspekte politekstual’nosti [Scientific text in polytextuality aspect]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 2001. 272 p. (in Russian).
14. Kholodnaya M. A. Kognitivnyye stili. O prirode individual’nogo uma [Cognitive styles. On the individual mind nature]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004. 384 p. (in Russian).
15. Grichin S. V. Avtorizatsionnaya model’ nauchnogo teksta. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Scientific text authorization model. Diss. doct. of phil. sci.]. Tomsk, 2017. 347 p. (in Russian).
16. Arutyunova N. D. Diskurs. Bol’shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Yazykoznanye [Discourse. Great encyclopedic dictionary. Linguistics]. Moscow, Bol’shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1998, pp. 136–137 (in Russian).
17. Kozhina M. N. Diskursivnyy analiz i funktsional’naya stilistika s rechevedcheskikh pozitsiy [Discourse-analysis and functional stylistics from speech studies positions]. Rechevedeniye. Teoriya funktsional’noy stilistiki: izbrannyye trudy [Speech studies. Functional stylistics theory: selected works]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2014, pp. 483–513 (in Russian).
18. Bazhenova E. A. Diskursivno-stilisticheskiy analiz teksta [Discourse-stylistic analysis of the text]. Stylistyka, 2014, no. XXIII, pp. 9–17 (in Russian).
( 424.15 kB ) 
( 415.24 kB )
Issue: 2, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: FUNCTIONAL STYLISTICS. COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF MEDIATEXT
Pages: 54 — 60
Downloads: 1790