Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.07.2025
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №6 DISCOURSE STYLISTIC SPECIFICITY OF THE EVALUATIVE MEANS IN A REGIONAL EDITION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REALIZATION OF THE TOPIC “F. M. DOSTOEVSKY IN KUZNETSK” IN THE CITY NEWSPAPER “KUZNETSKIY RABOCHIY”)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

DISCOURSE STYLISTIC SPECIFICITY OF THE EVALUATIVE MEANS IN A REGIONAL EDITION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REALIZATION OF THE TOPIC “F. M. DOSTOEVSKY IN KUZNETSK” IN THE CITY NEWSPAPER “KUZNETSKIY RABOCHIY”)

Pushkareva Irina Alekseevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-31-38

Information About Author:

Pushkareva I. A., Novokuznetsk Institute (branch) of Kemerovo State University (ul. Tsiolkovskogo, 23, Novokuznetsk, Russian Federation, 654041). E-mail: Irina_Pushkareva2016@mail.ru

The article examines the influence of the city newspaper’s discourse on the system of the evaluative means having the specificity determined by the memorial and local historical function of the regional edition. Semantic and stylistic analysis of the materials of the newspaper “Kuznetskiy rabochiy” (Novokuznetsk) linked to the local historical dominant “F. M. Dostoevsky in Kuznetsk” shows that the meliorative contexts prevail. Due to the semantic and stylistic analysis of the evaluative contexts participating in the representation of the examined local historical dominant, it is possible to identify two connected components of the value content: the Kuznetsk events in the writer’s life as the cultural heritage of the city and F. M. Dostoevsky’s contribution to the culture. The first component is more concretized, while the second component, which is the base of the first one from the logical point of view, is presented by the repeated periphrases and appendices characterizing F. M. Dostoevsky as an artist in the general meliorative (normative) aspect. The materials not linked to the local historical dominant “F. M. Dostoevsky in Kuznetsk” present the great writer’s contribution to the Russian and world culture in a more multidimensional way. The memorial and local historical function of the regional edition determines, primarily, the ethical evaluation actualization; however, it interacts with other types of the evaluation as well – teleological, normative, and aesthetic ones. During the realization of such topics as the importance of F. M. Dostoevsky’s stay for Kuznetsk, the preservation of the memory of this stay, the value of the contact with the spiritual space of the memory, the emotional and expressive means are constantly used in the evaluative contexts. The emotional and expressive intensity of the contexts increases together with the role of the ethical evaluation. In the examined newspaper materials, the topic of the preservation of cultural memory is the central one among the topics representing the hyper-topic of Dostoevsky’s stay in Kuznetsk as the cultural heritage of the city. Particularly, it is presented not only by the meliorative pole but also by the pejorative one actualizing the topic of cultural oblivion. Pejorative contexts are not isolated; they are used in correlation with the meliorative ones, which, due to such means as contrast, increases the pragmatic effect. Prevailing of the meliorative contexts in the representation of the local historical dominant “F. M. Dostoevsky in Kuznetsk” confirms the sustainable ideals of the regional community and the stable range of the materially embodied values discussed in the city newspaper.

Keywords: evaluation, evaluative means, emotional and expressive means, regional media discourse, city newspaper, local historical dominant

References:

1. Kagan M. S. Filosofskaya teoriya tsennostey: kurs lektsiy [Philosophical theory of the values: lecture course]. Saint Petersburg, Petropolis Publ., 1997. 205 p. (in Russian).

2. Kravets A. S. Smysly i tsennosti [Senses and values]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7. Filosofi ya – Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy, 2007, vol. 6, pp. 3–27 (in Russian).

3. Vol’f E. M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of the evaluation]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2002. 280 p. (in Russian).

4. Arutyunova N. D. Aksiologya v mekhanizmakh zhizni i yazyka [Axiology in the mechanisms of life and language]. Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki – 1982 [The issues of the structural linguistics – 1982]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. Pp. 5–23 (in Russian).

5. Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt [Types of the language meanings: Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 341 p. (in Russian).

6. Bazhenova E. A. Kategoriya otsenki [Evaluation category]. Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary (edited by M. N. Kozhina)]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2003. Pp. 139–146 (in Russian).

7. Matveeva T. V. Funktsional’nye stili v aspekte tekstovykh kategoriy: Sinkhronno-sopostavitel’nyy ocherk [Functional styles in the aspect of the text categories: Synchronous comparative essay]. Sverdlovsk, Ural University Publ., 1990. 172 p. (in Russian).

8. Ashurkova T. G. Kategoriya otsenki v gazetnoy publitsistike sovetskogo i noveyshego vremeni (na primere slov “novator”, “peredovik”, “udarnik”) [The evaluation category in the newspaper journalism of the USSR and modern times (on the example of the words “innovator”, “peredovik” (“the best employee”), “shock-worker”)]. Yazyk i diskurs sredstv massovoy informatsii v XXI veke. Pod redaktsiyey M. N. Volodinoy) [Language and discourse of the mass media in the 21st century. Edited by M. N. Volodina]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy prospekt Publ., 2011. Pp. 306–313 (in Russian).

9. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: mediynyye kommunikativnyye universalii [Communicative stylistics of the text: media communicative universals]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 9 (162), pp. 19–27 (in Russian).

10. Pushkareva I. A. Sotsial’naya otsenochnost’ v sovremennoy gazetnoy publitsistike [Social evaluation in the modern newspaper journalism]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, vol. 1 (116), pp. 237–243 (in Russian).

11. “Kuznetskiy rabochiy” – gazeta Novokuznetska [“Kuznetskiy rabochiy” – Novokuznetsk newspaper] (in Russian). URL: http://www.kuzrab.ru (accessed 29 April 2018).

12. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 390 p. (in Russian).

pushkareva_i._a._31_38_6_195_2018.pdf ( 472.96 kB ) pushkareva_i._a._31_38_6_195_2018.zip ( 465.14 kB )

Issue: 6, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS

Pages: 31 — 38

Downloads: 1193

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU