Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.07.2025
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №7 CONCEPT “FRIEND” ACTUALIZATION IN THE LANGUAGE USAGE OF THE YOUTH IN MODERN ENGLISH (ON THE EXAMPLE OF “BRO” AND ITS DERIVATIVES)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONCEPT “FRIEND” ACTUALIZATION IN THE LANGUAGE USAGE OF THE YOUTH IN MODERN ENGLISH (ON THE EXAMPLE OF “BRO” AND ITS DERIVATIVES)

Oprya Ekaterina Sergeyevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-7-38-42

Information About Author:

Oprya E. S., Novorossiysk branch of the Krasnodar Law University of the MOI of Russia (shosse Sukhumiyskoye, 12 km, Novorossiysk, Russian Federatioin, 353911). E-mail: shubudoyka@rambler.ru

The article deals with the concept Friend and the ways of its actualization in the language usage of the youth in English. It characterizes the youth as a special social and age group. The language usage of the youth is chosen in the article because of its dynamic development that meets the requirements of modern society. The results of the definition analysis of the lexeme “bro” and its derivatives as a part of concept Friend are given. The article presents formal and informal definitions of “bro”, which show two main connotations of the word: “blood relationships” and “kinship of souls” regardless of gender. It defines seven semantic fields with the “bro” root words which characterize the concept Friend in the English language. The fields are: friendship with no boundaries, close nonsexual relations between men, assistance, having fun, love, male friendship through the prism of attitude to women, friendship as hobby. The article describes each of the fields with details and states the increasing nominative ability of the lexeme “bro”. The concept Friend is becoming more pragmatic because of new nominations and semantic fields: friend is a person to spend free time with (bromam, to bro out, brover), even to make love to (friend-a-fit, broabe) or to interact with to gain more popularity (frien, frienaddict). However, modern language usage of the youth saves the “real friend” nominations: bromance, brover, bromandawg, frienbling, bro-action.

Keywords: concept Friend, semantic field, language usage, bro, concept representation, American slang

References:

1. Zagrebin V. V. Podkhody k opredeleniyu kategorii “molodyozh’” [Approaches to the defi nition of “the youth” category]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Kontsept” – Periodic scientifi c and methodological e-journal “Koncept”, 2014, no. 2, pp. 26–30 (in Russian).

2. Lisovskiy V. T. Dinamika sotsial’nykh izmeneniy (opyt sravnitel’nykh sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy rossiyskoy molodezhi) [The dynamics of social change (the experience of comparative sociological studies of Russian youth)]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya – Sociologocal Studies (Socis), 1998, no. 5, pp. 99–105 (in Russian).

3. Malinovskaya A. G. K voprosu ob issledovanii molodyozhnogo zhargona (v angliyskom yazyke) [On the issue of the study of youth jargon (in English)]. Osnovnyye voprosy lingvistiki, lingvodidaktiki i mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po fi lologii [The main issues of linguistics, linguodidactics and intercultural communication: a collection of scientifi c works on philology]. Astrakhan, 2011, no. 6. Pp. 34–36 (in Russian).

4. Kozhevnikova S. I. Yazyk kommunikatsii v molodyozhnoy subkul’ture [The language of communication in the youth subculture]. Pyatyye Lazarevskiye chteniya: “Liki traditsionnoy kul’tury”: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Chelyabinsk, 25–26 fevralya 2011 g. [Fifth Lazarevsky readings: “Faces of traditional culture”. Materials of the international scientifi c conference. Chelyabinsk, 25–26 February, 2011] (in Russian). URL: http://manytexts.com/lazarevskiechteniya (accessed 15 August 2018).

5. Oprya E. S., Donskova O. A. Protsessy aktualizatsii sovremennogo sostoyaniya kontsepta Drug v uzusakh russkogo i angliyskogo yazykov [Processes of actualization of the modern state of the concept Friend in the actual usage of the Russian and English languages]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal – International Research Journal, 2017, no. 1–3 (55), pp. 91–94 (in Russian).

6. Verónica Policarpo. What Is a Friend? An Exploratory Typology of the Meanings of Friendship. Soc. Sci., 2015, no. 4, pp. 171–191. DOI: 10.3390/socsci4010171

7. Corpus of Contemporary American English. URL: https://corpus.byu.edu/coca (accessed 20 August 2018).

8. British National Corpus (BYU-BNC). URL: https://corpus.byu.edu/bnc (accessed 20 August 2018).

9. Cambridge Dictionary. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org (accessed 23 August 2018).

10. Urban Dictionary. URL: https://www.urbandictionary.com (accessed 23 August 2018).

11. Sasha Taeva. Bromans: kakiye chuvstva byvayut u muzhchin drug drugu. URL: https://umnaja.ru/bromans/ (accessed 25 August 2018).

12. Wierzbicka A. Understanding cultures through their key words (English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese). New York, Oxford University Press, 1997. 328 p. (Russ. ed.: Vezhbickaya Anna. Ponimaniye kul’tur cherez posredstvo klyuchevyh slov. Per. s angl. A. D. Shmeleva. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2001. 288 p. (Yazyk. Semiotika. Kul’tura. Malaya seriya).

13. The Bro Code. URL: https://brocode.org/ (accessed 25 August 2018).

oprya_e._s._38_42_7_196_2018.pdf ( 448.95 kB ) oprya_e._s._38_42_7_196_2018.zip ( 443.01 kB )

Issue: 7, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND TEXT LINGUISTICS

Pages: 38 — 42

Downloads: 1232

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU