IMAGE COMPONENTS CORRELATION OF THE CONCEPT TRADITION AND ANTICONCEPT FASHION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-14-20
The article deals with the problem of «concept» and «anticoncept» relations by the example of concepts TRADITION and FASHION in the English world picture. Concept and anticoncept are interrelated and interconnected. The relations between them and a metaconcept domain are similar to those of hyponyms and a hyperonym but not absolutely identical. Therefore, concept and anticoncept relations shouldn’t be described in terms of antonymy, because these two mental representations are not simply contrasted to each other. They have integrative and distinctive features that can be restored by different means, including association experiment. A study of association links can help in modeling the structure of the concept. The resulting verbal associations reflect the conceptual signs of the concepts TRADITION and FASHION, indicate a deep rootedness in the consciousness of the English cultural stereotypes which are a figurative representation of what is traditional and what is fashionable. The full spectrum of obtained associations allows to speak about the specifics of the conceptual connections in the consciousness of English-speakers. On the basis of the association experiment data analysis, it is proposed to treat concepts TRADITION and FASHION as concept and anticoncept correspondingly and to determine them as interrelated and interconnected oppositions included in the same metaconcept domain VALUES and forming its poles.
Keywords: concept, anticoncept, metaconcept, moral values, association experiment
References:
1. Levin U. I. Izbrannye trudy. Poetika. Semiotika [Selected works. Poetics. Semiotics]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1998. 824 p. (in Russian).
2. Larina M. B. Srtategitcheskaya sostavlayushchaya kontseptov MAGIC i GLAMOUR [Strategical indication of the concepts MAGIC and GLAMOUR]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 9 (111), pp. 88–93 (in Russian).
3. Stepanov U. S. Kontsepty. Tonkaya plenka tsivilizatsii [Concepts. Thin film of civilization]. Moscow, 2007. 248 p. (in Russian).
4. Plokhinskiy N. A. Biometriya. 2-ye izdaniye [Biometrics. 2d edition]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1970. 83 p. (in Russian).
5. Novodranova V. L. Russkaya leksikografiya [Russian lexicography]. Moscow, Drofa Publ., 2009. Pp. 263–288 (in Russian).
6. Larina M. B. Korrelyatsiya kontsepta i antikontsepta v lingvokul’ture (na materiale kontseptov MAGIC i GLAMOUR). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Concept and anticoncept coorelation in linguaculture (by the example of concepts MAGIC and GLAMOUR). Diss. kand. of philol. sci.]. Novokuznetsk, 2011. 180 p. (in Russian).
7. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 390 p. (in Russian).
8. Sternin I. A. Znacheniye i kontsept: skhodstva i razlitchiya [Meaning and concept: similarities and differences]. Yazykovaya lichnost’: tekst, slovar’, obraz mira: sb. statey [Language personality: text, dictionary, world picture: collection of articles]. Moscow, Izd. RUDN Publ., 2006. Pp. 403–495 (in Russian).
9. Zalevskaya A. A. Vvedeniye v psikholingvistiku [Introduction into psycholinguistics]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 1999. 382 p. (in Russian).
10. Cherneyko L. O., Dolinskiy V. A. Imya sud’ba kak ob’’ekt kontseptual’nogo i assotsiativnogo analiza [The name fate as the object of conceptual and associative analysys]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – MSU Bulletin, 1996, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 20–41(in Russian).
11. Boldyrev N. N. Perekategorizatsiya glagola kak sposob formirovaniya smysla vyskazyvaniya [Verb recategorisation as a means of forming the content of the utterance]. Izvestila AN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 2001, pp. 103–146 (in Russian).
Issue: 8, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: COGNITIVE-DISCOURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS
Pages: 14 — 20
Downloads: 1167