STRUCTURAL PECULIARITIES ANALYSIS OF THE CATEGORY OF POSSESSIVENESS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-51-55
The heterogeneity of the category of possessiveness conditioned the emergence of different points of view on its structure. There is a vision of the category of possessiveness as a binary opposition. According to the semantics of the name of the possessor, his person, animacy, the degree of his concreteness or abstractness, and the semantics of the object of possession, many linguists distinguish such oppositions as alienable/unalienable appurtenance, internal/external possession, temporary/permanent possessiveness, absolute/relative appurtenance, actual/virtual possession, legal/somatic appurtenance. In the context of the gradual opposition possessive relations can be represented in the form of absolute/relative appurtenance, inalienable appurtenance, relatively inalienable possession, occasionally inalienable and properly alienable appurtenance. According to another interpretation, the object can be inalienable, semi-alienable and alienable. Onomasiological approach proponents describe the possessiveness using as a basis the extra linguistic reality: they describe eventual types of possessors, potential types of objects of possession, try to anticipate their potential relationship. Semasiological approach supporters take as a basis specific language and speech facts – various possessive constructions. They analyze the influence of the form of possessive constructions (presence/absence of noun determiners, verbs) on its semantics.
Keywords: opposition, unalienable possession, alienable possession, internal possession, external possession, temporary possession, permanent possession, actual possession, virtual possession, onomasiological approach, semasiological approach
References:
1. Balli Sh. Obshchaya lingvistika i voprosy frantsuzskogo yazyka. Per. s 3-go fr. izd. E. V. i T. V. Venttsel’. Red., vstup. st. i primech. R. A. Budagova. 2-e izd., ster. [General linguistics and problems of French. Translation from the 3rd French edition by E. V. and T. V. Ventsel’; editing, introductory article and note by R.A. Budagova. 2nd edition, stereotypical]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2001. 416p. (in Russian).
2. Bally Ch. L’expression des idées de sphère personnelle et de solidarité dans les langues indo-européennes. Festschrift Louis Gauchat, Paris, 1926.
3. Zhurinskaya M. A. Imennye posessivnye konstruktsii i problema neottorzhimoy prinadlezhnosti [Nominative possessive constructions and the problem of unalienable possession]. Kategorii bytiya i obladaniya v yazyke [Categories of being and possession in language]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. Pp. 194–258 (in Russian).
4. Guillaume G. Le problème de l’article et sa solution dans la langue française. Paris, Hachette et c-ie, 1919. 318 p.
5. Pottier B. Théorie et analyse en linguistique. Paris, Hachette, 1987. 224 p.
6. Lentsa A. L. Shirokoznachnost’ glagola i kontekst [Broadness of the verb and context]. Kishinev, Shtiintsa Publ., 1987. 98 p. (in Russian).
7. Iliya L. I. Ocherki po grammatike sovremennogo frantsuzskogo yazyka [Modern French grammar studies]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1970. 176 p. (in Russian).
8. Liperovskiy V. P. Posessivnye konstruktsii v indoariyskikh yazykakh (khindi, urdu, pandzhabi, bengal’skiy) [Possessive constructions in Indo-Aryan languages (Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Bengali]. Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies RAS Publ., 2002. 163 p. (in Russian).
9. Tseytlin S. N. Semanticheskaya kategoriia posessivnosti v russkom yazyke i eye osvoeniye rebenkom [The notional category of possessiveness in Russian and its assimilation by children]. Semanticheskiye kategorii v detskoy rechi [Notional categories in child speech]. Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2007. Pp. 201–219 (in Russian).
10. Butinov N. A., Likhtenberg Yu. M. Yazyki narodov Melanezii [Melanesian people languages]. Narody Avstralii i Okeanii. Pod redaktsiey S. A. Tokareva, S. P. Tolstova [Australia and Oceania people. Edited by S. A. Tokarev, S. P. Tolstov]. Moscow, Academy of Sciences USSR Publ., 1956. Pp. 375–392 (in Russian).
11. Golovacheva A. V. Kategoriya posessivnosti v plane soderzhaniya [Category of possessiveness in terms of content]. Kategoriya posessivnosti v slavyanskikh i balkanskikh yazykakh [Possessiveness category in Slavic and Balkan languages]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. Pp. 44–111 (in Russian).
12. Tulina T. A. Funktsional’naya tipologiya slovosochetaniy [Functional typology of word-combinations]. Kiev, Vishcha shkola Publ., 1976. 176 p. (in Russian).
13. Layonz D. Vvedeniye v teoreticheskuyu lingvistiku [Introduction in theoretical linguistics]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2010. 541 p. (in Russian).
( 567.16 kB ) 
( 365.76 kB )
Issue: 8, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS
Pages: 51 — 55
Downloads: 1100