Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.06.2025
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №8 CONTINUOUS PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION SYSTEM MODELING ON THE BASIS OF PROFESSIONAL PROBATION TECHNOLOGY: PRE-UNIVERSITY LEVEL
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONTINUOUS PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION SYSTEM MODELING ON THE BASIS OF PROFESSIONAL PROBATION TECHNOLOGY: PRE-UNIVERSITY LEVEL

Dyomina Ludmila Sergeevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-110-114

Information About Author:

Dyomina L.S., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: lyud_2@mail.ru

The process of modeling the system of continuous pedagogical education, its description at the pre-university (propaedeutic) level is shown. The project of this model with an emphasis on the use of such modern pedagogical technology as a professional test is presented. The pedagogical, diagnostic, orientation and acmeological potential of this technology is revealed. On the basis of the analysis of the theory and practice of pre-professional training of high school students to teaching identified the possibility of its integration into the content of the pedagogical classes. The experience of implementation of the model and analysis of its effectiveness in the practice of pedagogical classes (on the example of a joint project of the Federal state educational institution of higher education “Tomsk State Pedagogical University and municipal autonomous educational institution «secondary school №30 of Tomsk» «Socio-pedagogical class»). According to the results of the initial testing of the proposed model, the author formulated a number of conclusions: the importance of compliance with the principle of free professional self-determination of high school students, and therefore, the system should be very flexible and allow to build an individual route of professional development for each student; the effectiveness of the model largely depends on the structure of mechanisms of interaction of organizations-stakeholders (teacher training colleges and universities, schools, institutions of additional education of children, etc.) and all stakeholders. Taking into account these conclusions, the author identifies the need to adjust and refine the model proposed by him, and also outlines the prospects for further research on this topic in the context of building a system at the levels of undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate studies.

Keywords: professional training, pedagogical education, professional probation, pedagogical class, high school students, profile training, pre-university training, professional self-determination and career guidance

References:

1. Kontseptsiya podderzhki razvitiya pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [The concept of support for the development of teacher education] (in Russian). URL: http://minobrnauki.rf/dokumenty`/3871/fajl/2676/ (accessed 14 January 2014).

2. Derkach A. A., Zazykin V. G., Markova A. K. Psikhologiya razvitiya professionalа [Psychology of professional development]. Moscow, Izd-vo RANEPA Publ., 2000. 124 p. (in Russian).

3. Rezapkina G. V. Ya i moya professiya: Programma professional’nogo samopredeleniya dlya podrostkov [Me and my profession: professional self-determination program for teenagers]. Moscow, Genezis Publ., 2000. 128 p. (in Russian).

4. Lobanov V. V. Vozmozhnosti uchrezhdeniya dopolnitel’nogo obrazovaniya v sfere professional’noy orientatsii vospitannikov [Possibilities of the establishment of the additional education in sphere of professional councelling of pupils]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2009, no. 10 (88), pp. 81–85 (in Russian).

5. Revyakina V. I. Teoriya i praktika doprofessional’noy podgotovki starsheklassnikov k pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti: na materiale pedagogicheskikh klassov. Dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Theory and practice of pre-professional preparation of high school students for teaching: on the material of pedagogical classes. Diss. doct. f ped. sci.]. Barnaul, 2002. 362 p. (in Russian).

6. Revyakina V. I. Pedagogicheskiye klassy: nachal’naya stupen’ nepreryvnoy professional’noy podgotovki uchitelya [Pedagogical classes: initial stage of continuous professional training of teachers]. Tomsk, STT Publ., 2001. 236 p. (in Russian).

7. Smyshlyaeva L. G., Titova G. Yu. Razvitiye regional’noy praktiki proforientatsii shkol’nikov na pedagogicheskuyu deyatel’nost’: strategiya i resursy [Development of the regional practice of career guidance for pupils in commitment to teaching activity: strategy and resources]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2016, no. 5 (170), pp. 36–41 (in Russian).

8. Chistyakova S. N., Rodichev N. F. Ot ucheby k professional’noy kar’ere: ucheb. posobiye [From study to professional career: teaching aid]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2012 (in Russian).

9. Chistyakova S. N., Rodichev N. F., Sergeev I. S. Kriterii i pokazateli gotovnosti obuchayushchikhsya k professional’nomu samoopredeleniyu [Criteria and indicators of readiness of students for professional self-determination]. Professional’noye obrazovaniye. Stolitsza – Professional education. Capital, 2016, no. 8, pp. 10–16 (in Russian).

10. Smyishlyaeva L. G., Demina L. S., Titova G. Yu. Professional’naya proba kak pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya [Professional probation as a pedagogical technology]. Vyissheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2015, no. 4, pp. 65–69 (in Russian).

demina_l._s._110_114_8_197_2018.pdf ( 768.54 kB ) demina_l._s._110_114_8_197_2018.zip ( 365.68 kB )

Issue: 8, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: CHILDREN AND YOUTH EDUCATION

Pages: 110 — 114

Downloads: 1146

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU