ESSENCE AND DEVELOPMENT LEVELS OF FIRST-YEAR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PEDAGOGICAL PROJECT ACTIVITY
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-3-48-54
The aim of work is to know how the project activity development dynamics of first-year students of psychological and pedagogical departments could be arranged and prove suggestions of project activity development levels: reproductive, productive, constructive. Based on the previous research and experience of working with future teachers, we suggest a hypothesis that in order to organize learning academic activity of children, a student needs to discover his/her own logic of pedagogical project, which, besides the commonly known project stages of idea – implementation – result also includes discovery of pedagogical principles as the main essence of professional knowledge instead of using a ready pattern. The content analysis method was used which collect data associates with the student’s ability to project activities. The work describes the results of the experiment in which participated 76 first-year students of the Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Sociology of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “Siberian Federal University”, including 52 students from two experimental groups of psycho-pedagogical direction and 24 students from the control group of pedagogical direction of training. The results show that the progress in project activity development of experimental group students differs significantly from the progress in project activity development of control group students. Therefore, it is only the focused work of the teacher intended to develop and implement the pedagogical project ideas, based on the open search dialogue activity principles discovered and formulated by students, that brings them to such results as early as during the first year of studies.
Keywords: development, project activity, activity approach, project activity development levels
References:
1. Margolis A. A. Мodeli podgotovki pedagogov v ramkakh programm prikladnogo bakalavriata i pedagogicheskoy magistratury [Models of teacher training in the framework of applied bachelor and pedagogical magistracy programs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye (psyedu.ru), 2014, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 45–64 (in Russian).
2. Bederkhanova V. P. Bondarev P. B. Pedagogicheskoye proyektirovaniye v innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti [Pedagogical design in innovation]. Krasnodar, Kuban State University Publ., 2011. 54 p. (in Russian).
3. Bondarev P. B., Kurochkina V. E. Proyektnaya deyatel’nost’ uchitelya [Teacher’s project activity]. Krasnodar, Kuban State University Publ., 2012. 88 p. (in Russian).
4. Vasil’yev V. Proyektno-issledovatel’skaya tekhnologiya: razvitiye motivatsii [Design and research technology: the development of motivation]. Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 2000, no. 9, pp. 117–180 (in Russian).
5. Vorontsov A. B., Chudinova E. V. Urok v sisteme razvivayushchego obucheniya [Lesson in the system of developmental education]. Pervoye sentyabrya. Nachal’naya shkola, 2012, no. 23 (in Russian).
6. Glazychev V. L. Proektirovaniye v rezhime dialoga [Design in dialogue mode]. Sotsial“noye proyektirovaniye v sfere kul’tury [Social design in the fi eld of culture]. Moscow, Institute of Culture Publ., 1988. Pp. 83–89 (in Russian).
7. Guruzhapov V. A. Problema razvitiya professional’nykh kompetentsiy budushchikh spetsialistov [The problem of the development of professional competencies of future specialists]. Problemy psikhologii vysshey shkoly, 2008, no. 2, pp. 5–8 (in Russian).
8. Davydov V. V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory of developmental education]. Moscow, INTOR Publ., 1996. 544 p. (in Russian).
9. Beach P. Self-directed online learning: A theoretical model for understanding elementary teachers online experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 63, pp. 326–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.007.
10. Phan H. Students’ academic performance and various cognitive processes of learning: an integrative framework and empirical analysis. Educational Psychology, vol. 30 (3), pp. 297–322. DOI: 10.1080/01443410903573297.
11. Gijbels D., Watering G. van de, Dochy F., Bossche P. van den. The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 20 (4), pp. 327–341.
12. Davydov V. V., Repkin V. V. Kontseptsiya rossiyskogo nachal’nogo obrazovaniya (sistema D. B. El’konina – V. V. Davydova) [The concept of Russian primary education (system of D. B. Elkonin – V. V. Davydov)]. Moscow, Moskovskaya Internet Kompaniya, 2003 (in Russian). URL: http://www.ouro.ru/iro/official/concept/ (accessed 28 March 2014).
13. Yudina Yu. G. K probleme razrabotki urovnevoy modeli lichnostno-professional’nykh kompetentnostey pedagoga [To the problem of developing a layered model of personal and professional competence of a teacher]. Pedagogika razvitiya: dvizhushchiye sily i praktiki razvitiya: materialy 17-y Vserossiyskoy nauch.-prakt. konferentsii [Development pedagogy: driving forces and development practices: materials of the 17th Russian National Scientifi c and Practical Conference]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Institute for Advanced Studies Publ., 2011. Pp. 148–154 (in Russian).
14. Yudina Yu. G. O professional’nom stanovlenii pedagoga – praktika razvitiya [On the professional development of the teacher – development practice]. Praktika razvitiya: sovremennyye vyzovy: materialy 20-y nauch.-prakt. konf. [Development practice: modern challenges: materials of the 20th scientifi c-practical conference]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Institute for Advanced Studies Publ., 2014. 328 p. (in Russian).
15. Zinchenko V. P. Ideya praktiki i praktichnosti v traditsii G. P. Shchedrovitskogo [The idea of practice and practicality in the tradition of G. P. Shchedrovitskiy]. Moscow, Moskovskaya Internet Kompaniya Publ., 2007 (in Russian). URL: http://www.fondgp.ru/lib/mmk/47 (accessed 28 September 2016).
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: HIGHER EDUCATION PEDAGOGY
Pages: 48 — 54
Downloads: 686