Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 12.12.2025
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №4 CONTEXTUAL SYNONYMY IN CONCEPTUALIZATION AND LANGUAGE ACTUALIZATION PROCESSES (STUDY OF FOOTBALL NOMINATIONS)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONTEXTUAL SYNONYMY IN CONCEPTUALIZATION AND LANGUAGE ACTUALIZATION PROCESSES (STUDY OF FOOTBALL NOMINATIONS)

Akbayeva Farida Nazirovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-4-57-65

Information About Author:

Akbayeva F. N., Pyatigorsk State University (рr. Kalinina, 9, Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation, 357532). E-mail: farida-akbaeva@yandex.ru

Introduction. In this article on the example of football discourse texts, we look at the role of contextual synonymy in processes of conceptualization and language actualization. We analyze plurality of nominations at the intersection of theory of nomination, cognitive linguistics, discourse analysis, semantics and lexicology. The purpose of the study is to identify the role of contextual synonyms (CC) in the actualization and conceptualization of football concepts, with the COP being the main source of diversity in football nominations. Material and methods. Context in its broad meaning as a situation of communication, as well as in its narrow understanding as immediate surroundings of a word, largely determines the choice of lexical units and their semantics. Therefore, it makes it impossible to study plurality of nominations outside of context without overlooking or misrepresenting some significant information. That is why in this article we use the method of contextual-semantic analysis of nominations. Results and discussion. Language nominations show the way the author of an utterance conceptualizes a certain notion. These lexical variants in their turn, being «voiced» to the recipient, cause certain changes in the structure of recipient’s concepts, enriching them with new ideas, associations and connotations. Contextual synonyms serve as the main source of plurality of nominations, hence play an important part in language actualization of concepts and conceptualization itself. Applying contextual-semantic analysis to football nominations we discovered the following contextual synonyms of popular football concepts: to score (a goal) – to head (in/home), to fire, to net, to complete, to turn (home), to force, to slot, to slam, to smash, to shoot, to finish); a goal – home, the bottom corner, the net, the side netting, target; a goal (as a score/point) – an opener, the equalizer, the winner, a brace, a second, a finish, a stunner, a triumph, a free-kick, an effort; football/ball – danger, diamond, fruit. The variety of lexical actualizations is an indication of semantic richness of conceptualized units, and their importance to communicants. Culture and language specific features of football concepts represent the prospects of further research.

Keywords: contextual synonymy, contextual synonyms, nomination, invariant, concept, contextual-semantic analysis, conceptualization, language actualization

References:

1. Boldyrev N. N. Tipologiya kontseptov i yazykovaya interpretatsiya [Concepts classification and language interpretation]. Novaya Rossiya: traditsii i innovatsii v yazyke i nauke o yazyke [New Russia: traditions and innovations in language and linguistics]. Moscow, Yekaterinburg, 2016. Pp. 16–25 (in Russian). URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/42885 (accessed 14 October 2018).

2. Akbayeva F. N. Semantiko-stilisticheskiye i funktsional’nye osobennosti kontekstual’nykh sinonimov kak primerov variantnoy nominatsii [Semantic-stylistic and functional aspects of contextual synonyms as examples of alternate nomination]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, vol. 2 (191), pp. 41–47 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-41-47

3. Dictionary.com. URL: https://www.dictionary.com/ (accessed 20 November 2018).

4. Cambridge English dictionary. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ (accessed 20 November 2018).

5. Sinnot J. Arsenal missed the chance to reclaim top spot after drawing with Portsmouth. URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/7157353.stm (accessed 2 November 2018).

6. Hughes M. Liverpool 1v0 Barcelona. Live commentary. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2001/apr/19/minutebyminute.sport (accessed 2 November 2018).

7. Arsenal vs West Ham Unites. Football match report. URL: http://global.espn.com/football/barclays-premier-league/match/422664/arsenal-westham-united/report?src=com (accessed 2 November 2018).

8. Bailey R. Live commentary Arsenal – Everton. Premier League. URL: https://www.eurosport.com/football/premier-league/2017-2018/live-arsenaleverton_mtc946902/live.shtml (accessed 2 November 2018).

9. RTE: Cech fluffs his lines as Hammers upset Arsenal. URL: https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2015/0809/720152-west-ham-united-v-arsenal/ (accessed 2 November 2018).

10. Sportsmail reporter. Premier League table and results. URL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3192983/ (accessed 2 November 2018).

11. Shulyatikov I. S. Termin «Kontsept» v sovremennoy lingvistike [The term «Concept» in modern linguistics]. Bulletin of VyatGU, 2015, no. 12, pp. 98–102 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/termin-kontsept-v-sovremennoy-lingvistike-1 (accessed 4 November 2018).

12. Rudakova A. V. Kognitologiya i kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitology and cognitive linguistics]. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2004. 80 p. (in Russian).

13. Hirst G., Wang T. Near-synonym Lexical Choice in Latent Semantic Space. 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Beijing, China, August 23–27, 2010: Proceedings of the Conference. Beijing: S. p., 2010, pp. 1182–1190.

14. Reiter E., Sripada S. Contextual influences on near-synonym choice. Natural Language Generation: Tird International Conference, Brockenhurst, UK, July 14–16, 2004. Belz A., Evans R., Piwek P. (eds.). Berlin; Heidelberg; New York: Springer, 2004, pp. 161–170.

15. Xiao R., McEnery T. Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near Synonymy: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Applied Linguistics, 2006, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 103–129.

16. Zalevskaya A. A. Psikholingvisticheskiy podkhod k probleme kontsepta [Philosophical approach to the problem of concept]. Metodologicheskiye problemy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. Pod red. I. A. Sternina [Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics. Edited by I. A. Sternin]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2001. Pp. 36–44 (in Russian).

17. Belov V. A. Vzaimozamenyayemost’ kak kriteriy sinonimii (eksperimental’noye i korpusnoye issledovaniye) [Interchangeability as criterion for synonymy (experimental and corpus research)]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo un-ta. Yazyk i literatura – Saint Petersburg University Bulletin. Language and literature, 2018, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 390–411 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2018.306 (accessed 6 November 2018).

18. Akbayeva F. N. Kontekstual’naya sinonimiya kak osnova mnozhestvennosti nominatsiy [Contextual synonymy as a basis for plurality of nominations]. Lingvistika XXI veka: traditsii i novatsii [Linguistics of the XXI century: tradition and novation]. Pyatigorsk, 2016. Pp. 175–181 (in Russian).

akbaeva_f._n._57_65_4_201_2019.pdf ( 433.13 kB ) akbaeva_f._n._57_65_4_201_2019.zip ( 422.85 kB )

Issue: 4, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: CURRENT ISSUES IN LINGUISTICS

Pages: 57 — 65

Downloads: 1554

For citation:


2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU