THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE IMAGE AS THE BASIS FOR THE READERS ‘ PRACTICE IN THE STUDY OF MODERN LITERATURE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-6-97-104
The article deals with the problem of updating the traditional approach to image analysis in the literature lesson through the use of modern research in the field of philosophy and psychology. The reader’s practice is proposed, where a semiotic approach is implemented, which allows to identify the transformation of the reference image in the text of a writer of the second half of the twentieth century due to the “reverse translation” (A. Mikhailov), that is, the comparison of the reference image with the antique and classical interpretation. The main mechanism connecting the reference image with the archetype is the figurative transfer. The very phenomenon of transference presupposes the existence of a previous and subsequent situation, as well as the establishment of a relationship between them. This practice allows students not only to master the specifics of the figurative system of a particular work, but also to identify the author’s worldview that affects the poetics of the text. The development of the poetics of V. Petsuh’s “Prometheuschina” story takes place with the help of a consistent and multi-aspect reading (L. V. Shamrey), which displays different elements of the architectonics of the work, which allows the young reader to build a system of connections between the individual parts of the artistic whole. The inductive method of understanding the meaning focuses the attention of students on the non-linear type connections (repetitions, parallelisms) that arise when analyzing the central image of a story. With such an analysis, it becomes possible to identify semantic overlaps in various parts of the text and meaningful “nodes” that are significant for the interpretation of the work. Appeal to the historical and literary context (N. V. Gogol “Inspector”) makes students pay attention to the national peculiarity of the Russian mentality and adequately interpret the meaning of the actions of a literary hero, his attitude to people and to life. The final “convolution” of information about the text of V. Petsuh occurs in the interpretational activity of schoolchildren compared to the new image (N. V. Maslova) with other interpretations in modern art, which contributes to fixing the ideological changes that have occurred in the minds of a whole generation. Readership practice, combining the relationship of the figurative and logical in presentation of the material and technological effectiveness of the educational process, provides students with a certain degree of freedom of philosophizing in the classroom, and the teacher is guaranteed simplicity and effectiveness of use.
Keywords: reading, artistic detail, figurative transformation, typification, symbolization, philosophicity
References:
1. Leyderman N. L. S vekom naravne. Rysskaya literatyrnaya klassika v sovetskuyu epokhy [On a par with century. Russian classical literature in the Soviet era]. Saint Petersburg, Zlatoust Publ., 2005. 368 p. (in Russian).
2. Lanin B. A. Sovremennaiya russkaya literatura: uchebnoye posobiye dlya starsheklassnikov i postupayushchikh v universitety [Modern Russian Literature: Textbook for higher school students and universities applicants]. Moscow, Ventana-Graf Publ., 2007. 336 p. (in Russian).
3. Ken’ko A. A. O literatyrotsentrizme v tvorchestve V. P’yetsukha [On the literary centrism of creativity of V. Pietsukh]. Problemy istoryi, filologii i cul’tury – Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies, 2012, no. 3, pp. 211–217 (in Russian).
4. Lipovetsky M. N. Russkiy postmodernizm: Ocherki istorii i poetiki [Russian postmodernism: essays on historical poetics]. Ekaterinburg, 1997. 317 p. (in Russian).
5. Bibler V. S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike cul’tury: Dva fi losofskikh vvedeniya v 21 veke [From science to the logic of culture: Two philosophical introductions in the 21st century]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 413 p. (in Russian).
6. Davydov V. V. Novyy podkhod k ponimaniyy struktury i soderzaniya deyatel’nosti [A new approach to understanding the structure and content of the activity]. Voprosy psychologii – Voprosy Psychologii, 2003, no. 2, pp. 42–49 (in Russian).
7. Marantsman V. G. Tseli i struktura kursa literatury v shkole [The objectives and structure of the course of literature in school]. Literatura v shkole, 1998, no. 8. pp. 91–99 (in Russian).
8. Solov’yev E. Yu. Egzistentsial’naya soteriologiya Meraba Mamardashvili [Existential Soteriology of Merab Mamardashvili]. Merab Konstantinovich Mamardashvili. Ed. N. V. Motroshilova. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. Pp. 174–202 (in Russian).
9. Petrovskaya E. V. V storony obraza: ob odnom vozmognom primenenii symvologii [In the direction of the image: one possible application of symbology]. Merab Konstantinovich Mamardashvili. Ed. N. V. Motroshilova. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. Pp. 85–98 (in Russian).
10. Maslova N. V. Bioadekvatnaya metodika prepodavaniya. Otv. red. N. V. Kulikova [Bioadequate methods of teaching. Ed. N. V. Kulikova]. Moscow, 2008. 79 p. (in Russian).
11. Epstein M. Vse esse: v 2 t. T. 1: V Rossii [All essays: in 2 volumes. Vol. 1 In Russia]. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya Publ., 2005. 544 p. (in Russian).
12. Shamrey L. V. Osobennosti structurirovaniya ychebnogo protsessa na yrokakh modeliruyushchego tipa [Peculiarities of structuring the educational process at the lessons of the modeling type]. Obraznost’ kak printsip i sposob obycheniya. Nauch. red. L. V. Shamrey, S. V. Tikhonova [Imagery as a principle and method of education. Scientifi c ed. L. V. Shamrey, S. V. Tikhonova]. N. Novgorod, NIRO Publ., 2015. Pp. 29–40 (in Russian).
13. Okon’ V. Vvedeniye v obshchuyu didaktiku [Introduction to General didactics]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1990. 382 p. (in Russian).
14. P’yetsukh V. A. Prometeishina [Promethasine]. Veselye vremena [Fun times]. Moscow, Moskovskiy rabochiy Publ., 1988. 238 p. (in Russian).
15. Lotman Yu. M. O Khlestakove [About Khlestakov]. V schkole poeticheskogo slova: Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol: kniga dlya ychitela [School of poetic words: Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol: a book for teachers]. Moscow, Education Publ., 1988. 352 p. (in Russian).
16. Bocharov A. G. Beskonechnost’ poiska [Infi nity search]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1982. 424 p. (in Russian).
( 452.36 kB ) 
( 445.36 kB )
Issue: 6, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN LITERARY EDUCATION
Pages: 97 — 104
Downloads: 1172