Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 25.05.2025
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №9 EPISTEMIC MEANINGS OF IMAGINE CLASS VERBS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

EPISTEMIC MEANINGS OF IMAGINE CLASS VERBS

Semenova Tatyana Ivanovna, Ishenina Anna Sergeyevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-9-9-15

Information About Author:

Semenova T. I., Irkutsk State University (ul. Lenina, 8, Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664025). E-mail: tisemenova54@mail.ru. Ishenina A. S., Irkutsk State University (ul. Lenina, 8, Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664025). E-mail: anna.ishenina@yandex.ru

Introduction. The article focuses on the ways human beings conceptualize, structure and make sense of their physical and mental experience. Mental states of perception, imagination, belief, knowledge interact tightly with one another and this ontological nature is represented in the lexical semantics of the verbs see, imagine, believe, think, know. Thus, the main concern of the study is to highlight cognitive-semantic grounds of the semantic shifts of the imagine class verbs and to reveal syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic properties of the utterances arranged by these verbs. Material and methods. The research is based on the empirical data from available sources and corpora data. The research is conducted within the cognitive linguistics framework where a common view is that meaning has a cognitive nature. Results and discussion. The paper explores how lexical meanings get extended in a particular cognitive context. The findings of the study suggest that the verbs under consideration function as IMAGINERY VISION verbs and as epistemic verbs in the cognitive context BELIEF. The results obtained suggest that meanings of the imagine class verbs (supposition/evaluative judgment/wrong opinion) imply that related word “senses” may be part of a continuum of meanings rather than discrete entity. The research highlights polyphony as an important double-voiced dimension of the utterances with the imagine class verbs in the cognitive context BELIEF. Conclusion. The findings of the study prove that the meanings of the imagine class verbs occupy overlapping areas of semantic space. The results obtained may contribute to further studies of the word meaning theory.

Keywords: mental state, proposition, propositional attitude, imagination, semantic derivation, evaluative judgment, supposition

References:

1. Gak V. G. Prostranstvo mysli (opyt sistematizatsii slov mental’nogo polya) [The space of thought (The experience of organizing the words of the mental fi eld]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Mental’nyye deystviya [Logical analysis of language: mental actions]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. Pp. 22–29 (in Russian).

2. Niiniluoto I. Zametki o logike vospriyatiya [Notes on the logic of perception]. Modal’nyye i intensional’nyye logiki i ikh primeneniye k problemam metodologii nauki [Modal and intensional logics and their application to methodology of science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. Pp. 329–340 (in Russian).

3. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. 2-ye izd., ispr. [Language and the world of man. 2nd ed., rev.]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).

4. Prokopenko A. V. Semantiko-sintaksicheskaya organizatsiya predlozheniy s propozitsional’nymi glagolami znaniya, polaganiya i voobrazheniya v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke. Dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Semantic-syntactic organization of sentences with propositional verbs of knowledge, position and imagination in modern English. Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Irkutsk, 1999. 144 p. (in Russian).

5. Zaliznyak A. A. Issledovaniya po semantike predikatov vnutrennego sostoyaniya [Studies on the semantics of internal state predicates]. Munich, Otto Sagner Publ., 1992. 201 p. (in Russian).

6. Semenova T. I. Semantika i sintaksis konstruktsiy s predikatami strakha v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke. Dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Semantics and syntax of constructions with predicates of fear in modern English. Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Irkutsk, 1993. 170 p. (in Russian).

7. Shvedova N. Yu. Tri zametki o smyslovykh peresecheniyakh [Three notes on semantic intersections]. Sokrovennyye smysly: Slovo. Tekst. Kul’tura: sb. statey v chest’ N. D. Arutyunovoy [Sacred meanings: Word. Text. Culture: collected papers in honor of N. D. Arutyunova]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. Pp. 242−254 (in Russian).

8. Paducheva Ye. V. Glagoly sozdaniya obraza: leksicheskoye znacheniye i semanticheskaya derivatsiya [Verbs of image creation: lexical meaning and semantic derivation]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language), 2003, no. 6, pp. 30–46 (in Russian).

9. Shatunovskiy I. B. Semantika predlozheniya i nereferentnyye slova (znacheniye, kommunikativnaya perspektiva, pragmatika) [Semantics of the sentence and non-referential words (meaning, communicative perspective, pragmatics)]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1996. 400 p. (in Russian).

10. Roth P. American Pastoral. London, Vintage Books, 1997. 423 p.

11. Fielding H. Bridget Jones’s Diary. London, Picador, 1997. 310 p.

12. Seliverstova O. N. Trudy po semantike [Works on semantics]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. 960 p. (in Russian).

13. Rassel B. Issledovaniye znacheniya i istiny [An inquiry into meaning and truth]. Moscow, Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual’noy knigi Publ., 1999. 399 p. (in Russian).

14. Christie A. Why Didn’t They Ask Evans? Moscow, Menedzher Publ., 2002. 228 p.

15. Weisberger L. The Devil Wears Prada. N. Y., Broadway Books, 2006. 360 p.

16. Shaw I. Nightwork. Saint Petersburg, Antologiya, KARO Publ., 2005. 448 p.

17. Dmitrovskaya M. A. Znaniye i mneniye: obraz mira, obraz cheloveka [Knowledge and opinion: world image, human image]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Znaniye i mneniye [Logical analysis of language: knowledge and opinion]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. Pp. 6–18 (in Russian).

18. Kustova G. I. Tipy proizvodnykh znacheniy i mekhanizmy yazykovogo rasshireniya [Types of derived values and mechanisms of language extension]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. 472 p. (in Russian).

19. Semenova T. I. Oshibochnyye kognitsii skvoz’ prizmu yazyka [Erroneous cognitions from a lingustic view point]. Vestnik IGLU, 2010, no. 3, pp. 136–143 (in Russian).

20. Hailey A. The Final Diagnosis. Saint Petersburg, KARO Publ., 2015. 384 p.

21. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Third Edition. Essex, Longman Group Ltd., 1997. 1680 p.

22. Dell E. M. Rosa Mundi and Other Stories. N. Y., Books for Library Press, 1970. 389 p.

23. Longman Language Activator. Harlow, Longman Group UK Limited, 1997. 1587 p.

24. Paducheva Ye. V. Semanticheskiye issledovaniya (semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke; semantika narrativa) [Semantic research (semantics of tense and aspect in Russian; semantics of narrative)]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1996. 464 p. (in Russian).

25. Zaliznyak A. A. Predikaty oshibochnogo mneniya v svete semanticheskoy tipologii: glagol mnit’ [Predicates of erroneous opinion in the context of semantic typology: the verb think]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Mezhdu lozh’yu i fantaziyey [Logical analysis of language. Between lie and fantasy]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2008. Pp. 106–118 (in Russian).

26. Zaliznyak A. A. Mnogoznachnost’ v yazyke i sposoby yeye predstavleniya [Polysemy in a language and ways of its presentation]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2006. 672 p. (in Russian).

27. Winfi eld A. M. The Young Bridge Tender. URL: https://www.novelall.com/chapter/The-Young-Bridge-Tender-Part-22/508366.html (accessed 18 July 2019).

28. Chase H. С. Come easy – Go easy. Moscow, Ayris-press Publ., 2003. 384 p.

29. Mitchell M. Gone with the wind. N. Y., Warner Books, 1999.1037 p.

30. Alexander L. G. Longman English Grammar. N.Y., Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., 1988. 374 p.

31. The Free Dictionary. URL: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/fancy+myself+as (accessed 20 July 2019).

32. Abott J. History of King Charles II of England. URL: https://freeditorial.com/en/books/history-of-king-charles-ii-of-england (accessed 22 July 2019).

semenova_t._i._9_15_9_206_2019.pdf ( 430.73 kB ) semenova_t._i._9_15_9_206_2019.zip ( 424.01 kB )

Issue: 9, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 9

Rubric: RESEARCH OF GERMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 9 — 15

Downloads: 1043

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU