Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 20.07.2025
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №9 CONCEPTS “ETHICS”, “MEMORY” AND “POWER” IN CROSS-GENRE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS (BASED ON THE WORKS OF VIET THANH NGUYEN “NOTHING EVER DIES” AND “THE SYMPATHIZER”)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONCEPTS “ETHICS”, “MEMORY” AND “POWER” IN CROSS-GENRE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS (BASED ON THE WORKS OF VIET THANH NGUYEN “NOTHING EVER DIES” AND “THE SYMPATHIZER”)

Myachin Konstantin Aleksandrovich

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-9-54-63

Information About Author:

Myachin K. A., Dostoevsky Omsk State University (pr. Mira, 55a, Omsk, Russian Federation, 644077). E-mail: konstmya1@mail.ru

Introduction. In this article we attempted to analyze the textual material of two multi-genre works written by one author. Our attention was drawn to the mechanisms of actualization of meaning at the level of words, phrases and sentences. In the course of our analysis, we also identified concepts that are significant for the author and described the role of concept-regulators in the formation of meaning represented in fiction and publicistic texts. Purpose of the study. Our purpose is to analyze the textual material of two multi-genre works of literature and prove that certain set of relevant meanings, represented by the concepts “ethics”, “memory” and “power” within the text of a publicistic work, will also be present in the conceptual-semantic content of the work of fiction by the same author. Material and methods. We have used the following methods: conceptual and structural analysis of the text, stylistic analysis of the text, associative-semantic interpretation of the text in the context of communicative and anthropocentric paradigms; morphological, lexical and syntactic analysis of the text with allocation of its separate levels represented by a word and an utterance. Works of Viet Thanh Nguyen “The Sympathizer” and “Nothing Ever Dies” with a total volume of 727 pages is the material of the research. Results and discussion. The study confirmed the suppositional hypothesis. The semantic dominant “memory” inside the semantic field “love – life – war – memory – sensation”, which we discovered earlier in the analysis of the “The Sympathizer”, remains analogous in the publicistic work “Nothing Ever Dies”. The analysis of the work “Nothing Ever Dies” confirmed the remaining actuality of the dominant concept “memory”, the significant concept “power” and also allowed us to highlight and describe the properties of the concept-regulators “ethics” and “dual”. Conclusion. The stylistic, syntactic, conceptual and structural analysis of the two texts allowed us to single out previously unnoticed functional concepts-regulators “ethics” and “dual” implemented in speech in conjunction with other concepts that demonstrate greater substantiality, but less functionality, such as “memory” and “power”. The duality of the concept “memory” is not an internal attribute of this concept, but arises under the influence of the concept-regulatory “dual”. The same is true for other substantial concepts, such as, for example, “power”.

Keywords: concept, concept-regulator, multi-genre works, publicistic work, discourse, transmission of meaning

References:

1. Viet Thanh Nguyen. The Sympathizer. New York, Grove Press, 2015. 370 p.

2. Starichenok V. D. Bol’shoy lingvisticheskiy slovar’ [Great linguistic dictionary]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2008. 811 p. (in Russian).

3. Viet Thanh Nguyen. Nothing Ever Dies. Vietnam and the Memory of War. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 2016. 374 p.

4. Kuznetsov V. G. Slovar’ fi losofskikh terminov [Dictionary of philosophical terms]. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2005. 731 p. (in Russian).

5. Karasik V. I., Prokhvacheva O. G., Zubkova Ya. V., Grabarova E. V. Inaya mental’nost’ [Different mentality]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2005. 352 p. (in Russian).

6. Asratyan Z. D. Esteticheskaya informatsiya khudozhestvennogo teksta i yeye kontseptualiziruyushchaya rol’ [Aesthetic information of imaginative literature and its conceptualizing function]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnyye issledovaniya – The Science of Person: Humanitarian Research, 2016, no. 24, pp. 10–17 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2016.24.10.

7. Van Rit J., de Swart P., Wijnands A., Coppen P.-A. When students tackle grammatical problems: Exploring linguistic reasoning with linguistic metaconcepts in L1 grammar education. Linguistics and Education, 2019, vol. 52, pp. 78–88.

8. Myachin K. A. Sintaksicheskiye osobennosti ritmicheskoy organizatsii mikroteksta i modal’nost’ yego vospriyatiya (na materiale proizvedeniya V’et Tan Nguena The Sympathizer) [Sintactic peculiarities of rhythmic organization of microtext and modality of its perception (on the material of Viet Thanh Nguyen’s The Sympathyzer]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnyye issledovaniya – The Science of Person: Humanitarian Research, 2019, no. 1 (35), pp. 44–51 (in Russian).

9. Google Perevodchik [Google translate]. URL: https://translate.google.kz [www.translate.google.com] (accessed 24 August 2019).

10. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty. Slovar’ russkoy kul’tury. Opyt issledovaniya [Constants. Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1997. 824 p. (in Russian).

11. Pinker Steven. The Language Instinct. Perennial, 2000. 502 p.

12. Linell Per. Language Sciences. November 2013, volume 40, pp. 168–173.

13. Finch G. Key concepts in language and linguistics. Palgrave. Macmillan. 2005. 249 p.

14. Butakova L. O., Vikulova A. I. Teksty o pozhilom cheloveke v regional’nom mediynom prostranstve [Texts about an elderly person in the regional media space]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2019, vol. 5 (202), pp. 7–15 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-5-7-15

15. Stepanova E. S. Lingvokognitivnyye osobennosti nauchno-populyarnogo meditsinskogo diskursa [Linguocognitive peculiarities of the scientifi c and popular medical discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2019, vol. 4 (201), pp. 95–101 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-5-7-15

myachin_k._a._54_63_9_206_2019.pdf ( 488.38 kB ) myachin_k._a._54_63_9_206_2019.zip ( 480.67 kB )

Issue: 9, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 9

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 54 — 63

Downloads: 1096

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU