BASIC FORMS OF TRAINING ORGANIZATION IN THE UNIVERSITY UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF DISTANCE EDUCATION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-5-62-68
Introduction. Distance education at the present stage of the development of world educational practice has become global. The range of educational services has expanded significantly; the number of educational organizations and institutions involved in this form of education has increased; a huge number of students use the Internet, gadgets and knowledge-based services. Distance education allows, if necessary, using the Internet to obtain “remote” education. This need today has become the epidemiological situation in the world with the spread of infection caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV). The aim of the study was to analyze and characterize the main effective forms of organizing education in higher education in the new conditions of organizing the educational process. Material and methods. The material for the study was the work of domestic and foreign researchers, considering the problems and advantages of distance education: A. A. Andreeva, I. A. Kuznetsova, A. G. Slomchinskaya, E. A. Taushkanova, J. S. Brown, Y. B. Kolikant, M. Miah & A. Omar, as well as materials obtained during practical work under the conditions of “distance” in Bunin Yelets State University. Theoretical and methodological analysis, comparison, method of pedagogical interpretation of data, generalization, concretization were used as methods in the work. The methodological basis of the study was the main modern psychological, sociological and philosophical provisions of the theory of personality and its development. Results and discussion. Distance education has a number of characteristic features: flexibility, modularity, innovative control of the quality of education, role repertoire of the teacher, economic benefit, etc., as well as specific principles: the principle of free access, the principle of distance, the principle of interactivity, the principle of identification, the principle of adequacy and expediency of using digital technologies in distance education. The introduction of distance education contributes to the emergence of new, more effective educational forms, the development of which is based on the listed characteristics. As effective forms of distance education, one can consider the development and implementation of the necessary for mastering the discipline of the list of basic and additional literature, educational and methodological sets of literature and tasks; sending educational materials to both students and teachers from students, using e-mail (in e-mail).; organization and conduct of discussions and consultations in online format using cloud platforms ZOOM, Jitsi, etc., free application WhatsApp for personal smartphones, social network VKontakte, application Telegram, etc.; development and implementation of computer databases, electronic textbooks, etc.; videoconferences similar to live TV shows with the opportunity for viewers to call the “hotline” and ask their questions, etc. Video lecture is also an effective form of distance education, allowing to reach a large number of students, activating the mental delicacy of students and motivating for independent search within the framework of the studied discipline. Conclusion. In modern conditions, the use of remote educational technologies has a large number of advantages. Since distance education has a wide range of multimedia, interactive, communicative and technical capabilities, contributes to the formation and development of ICT competence, expands the range of opportunities for the use of various information tools, it can organically weave into the full-time learning system, or become a significant alternative to traditional learning. The effectiveness and success of the introduction of distance education technologies depend on the competent and high-quality organization of the educational process and the use of effective forms of education.
Keywords: digitalization of education, distance education, forms of education, distance learning, principles of distance education, video lectures, the Internet, digital technologies
References:
1. Slomchinskiy A. G., Taushkanova E. A. Distantsionnoye vyssheye obrazovaniye: simbioz teorii i praktiki [Distance higher education: symbiosis of theory and practice]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy arkhiv UrFU [Electronic Scientific Archive of UrFU] (in Russian). URL: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/50508/1/notv-2015-007.pdf (accessed 17 June 2021).
2. Romanov E. V. Higher education: Current state and development prospects. Ekonomicheskaya Politika – Economic policy, 2018, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 182–205. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-3-08
3. Deryuga V. E. Obrazovaniye XXI veka: chto dostayetsya tsifre, chto ostayetsya uchitelyu? [Education of the 21st century: what does the figure get, what is left for the teacher?]. Razvitiye lichnosti v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obrazovaniya: ot nachal’noy k vysshey shkole: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem, priurochennoy k 45-letiyu podgotovki pedagogicheskikh kadrov dlya nachal’noy shkoly v Eletskom gosudarstvennom universitete im. I. A. Bunina, 15–16 oktyabrya 2020 goda [Personal development in the context of digitalization of education: from elementary to higher education: materials of the Russian national scientific conference with international participation, timed to coincide with the 45th anniversary of the training of teachers for elementary schools at Bunin Yelets State University, October 15–16, 2020]. Yelets, Bunin Yelets State University Publ., 2020. Pp. 13–21 (in Russian).
4. Strategiya razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na 2017–2030 gody [Strategy for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030] (in Russian). URL: https://sudact.ru/law/ukaz-prezidenta-rf-ot-09052017-n-203/strategiia-razvitiia-informatsionnogo-obshchestva-v/ (accessed 17 April 2021).
5. Zubov A. V. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v lingvistike [Information technology in linguistics]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2004. 208 p. (in Russian).
6. Kuznetsova I. A. Otsenka kachestva sistem distantsionnogo obucheniya [Quality assessment of distance learning systems] (in Russian). URL: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/50508/1/notv-2015-007.pdf (accessed 1 June 21).
7. Andreyev A. A., Soldatkin A. A. Distantsionnoye obucheniye: sushchnost’, tekhnologiya, organizatsiya [Distance learning: essence, technology, organization]. Moscow, Publishing house MESI Publ., 1999. 196 р. (in Russian).
8. Andreyev A. A. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponyatiya “distantsionnoye obucheniye” [On the question of the definition of the concept of “distance learning”]. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye – Open Education, 1998, no. 4, рр. 16–19 (in Russian).
9. Green C. S., Bavelier D. Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 2003, vol. 423 (6939), рр. 534–537. DOI: 10.1038/nature01647
10. Peterson P. In the digital world, every district can compete with every other. Education Next, February 9, 2012. Accessed on 20th November 2019. URL: http://educationnext.org/in-the-digital-world-every-district-can-compete-with-every-other/ (accessed 17 April 2021).
11. Brown J. S. Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education and the ways people learn. Change, 2005, vol. 32 (2), рр. 10–20. DOI: 10.1080/00091380009601719
12. Kolikant Y. B. Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, vol. 26, iss. 6, рр. 1384–1391. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.04.012
13. Miah M., & Omar A. Technology advancement in developing countries during digital age. International Journal of Science and Applied Information Technology, 2012, vol. 1 (1), рр. 30–38. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330901911_Impact_of_Advances_in_Mobile_Technology_on_Higher_Education_in_Developing_Countries. (accessed 2 June 2021).
14. Thirunarayanan M. O., Lezcano H., McKee M., & Roque G. “Digital nerds” and “digital normal”: Not “digital natives” and “digital immigrants”. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2011, vol. 8, iss. 2, рр. 25–33. DOI: 10.5817/SP2014-4-8
15. Korneyev A. N., Tolokonnikova E. V. Distantsionnoye obucheniye: budushcheye razvitiya obrazovaniya. Uchebnometodicheskoye posobiye [Distance learning: the future of education development. Study guide]. Moscow, Mir nauki Publ., 2019 (in Russian). URL: http://izd-mn.com/PDF/13MNNPU19.pdf (accessed 10 June 2021).
16. Polat E. S. Organizatsiya distantsionnogo obucheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Organization of distance learning in the Russian Federation]. Informatika i obrazovaniye – Computer science and education, 2005, no. 4, pp. 25–33 (in Russian).
17. Gur’yev S. V. Sovremennoye distantsionnoye obucheniye [Modern distance learning]. Moscow, Rusaynes Publ., 2018. 118 p. (in Russian).
18. Khutorskoy A. V. Distantsionnoye obucheniye i ego tekhnologii [Distance learning and its technologies]. Komp’yuterra – Computerra, 2002, no. 36, pp. 26–30 (in Russian).
19. Avdeyeva E. N., Latsko N. A., Pikhota O. V., Sayto E. D. Razrabotka videolektsii: metodicheskiye rekomendatsii [Development of a video lecture: guidelines]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, IROSO Publ., 2019. 32 р. (in Russian).
20. Xerri M. J., Radford K. & Shacklock K. Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher education, 2018, vol. 75, pp. 589–605. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9
( 389.35 kB ) 
( 383.09 kB )
Issue: 5, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: THEORY AND METHODS OF TEACHING
Pages: 62 — 68
Downloads: 1282