NEW FORMS OF LAWYERS’ PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION IN THE MEDIA ( ANALYSIS OF INTERNET COMMUNITIES CONTENT)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-6-97-104
Introduction. The activity of professional groups in the media environment has generated hybrid professional discourses that retain the typological features of the corresponding institutional discourses, while modified method and channel of communication has led to significant transformations in the structure of discourse and development of characteristic features peculiar to the media discourse. Aim and objectives. The study aims to determine the status and typological features of legal discourse produced and consumed within media. The objectives of the research include the correlation of the parameters of institutional discourse and media discourse, the role of each of them and the impact on the structure of hybrid discourse. Material and methods. The data include 300 texts of various styles and genres, constituting the content of professional legal groups on the social network Instagram: such as Internet memes; narratives representing the description of cases of professional practice. Results and discussion. In this study, the variety of legal discourse produced and consumed within the media is defined as an informal legal discourse on the basis that its core consists of the discourse-forming categories of institutional legal discourse. The sphere of functioning of the informal legal discourse is mass communication, which entails changes in the conceptual organization of discourse and the parameters of communication. The texts of the informal legal discourse acquire the characteristics of a “media text”, in which the verbal and media components are closely interrelated and combined with each other on the basis of a variety of principles. A specific way of communication determines a number of characteristics that bring legal informal discourse closer to everyday and humorous discourse and causes changes in stylistic and linguistic parameters. Conclusion. The analysis revealed the relationship between the parameters of the institutional legal discourse and the media discourse. The media environment is a fundamental condition that determines such parameters of the description of discourses as a method of communication and a mode. These parameters influenced changes in the structure of the institutional legal discourse at the communicative level and led to significant shifts in the communicative model due to the expansion of the concept of addressee. The media environment is a decisive factor in expanding the capabilities of a text that develops the characteristics of a “media text”. The specific way of communication has caused a number of characteristics that bring the legal informal discourse closer to the ordinary and humorous discourse and causes a change in the language norm.
Keywords: discourse, legal discourse, informal legal discourse, media, legal media discourse, mediatization
References:
1. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of the theory of discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2003. 280 p. (in Russian).
2. Van Dijk Ton A. Diskurs i vlast’: Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii [Discourse and Power: Representation of Dominance in Language and Communication]. Moscow, LIBROKOM Publ., 2013. 344 p. (in Russian).
3. Kibrik A. A. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoy perspektive. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Discourse analysis in a cognitive perspective. Diss. doct. philol. nauk]. Moscow, Institute of Liguistics RAS Publ., 2003. 90 p. (in Russian).
4. Karasik V. I. O kategoriyakh diskursa [On the categories of discourse]. Yazykovaya lichnost’: sotsiolingvisticheskiye i emotivnyye aspekty [Language personality: sociolinguistic and emotive aspects]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 1998. Pp. 185–197 (in Russian).
5. Karasik V. I. Struktura institutsional’nogo diskursa [The structure of institutional discourse]. Problemy rechevoy kommunikatsii [Verbal communication issues]. Saratov, SSU Publ., 2000. Pp. 25–33 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35163141 (accessed 16 March 2021).
6. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 476 p. (in Russian).
7. Kolesnikova L. V. Yuridicheskiy diskurs kak rezul’tat kategorizatsii i kontseptualizatsii deystvitel’nosti (na materiale predmetnoterminologicheskoy oblasti “Mezhdunarodnoye chastnoye pravo”). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Legal discourse as a result of the categorization and conceptualization of reality (on the material of the subject-terminological area “Private International Law”). Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Stavropol’, 2007. 19 p. (in Russian).
8. Konovalova M. V. Global’nyye kategorii kogerentnosti i intertekstual’nosti v yuridicheskom diskurse. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Global categories of coherence and intertextuality in legal discourse. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Chelyabinsk, 2008. 25 p. (in Russian).
9. Bogatyrev A. V. Funktsionirovaniye figur interteksta v sovremennom yuridicheskom diskurse. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [The functioning of intertext figures in modern legal discourse. Dis. cand. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2016. 168 p. (in Russian).
10. Fedulova M. N. Yuridicheskiy diskurs kak sotsiokul’turnyy i yazykovoy fenomen: urovni nauchnoy interpretatsii [Legal discourse as a sociocultural and linguistic phenomenon: levels of scientific interpretation]. Filologicheskiye nauki v MGIMO – Philology at MGIMO, 2015, no. 4, pp. 47–59 (in Russian).
11. Kosonogova O. V. Kharakteristiki yuridicheskogo diskursa: granitsy, soderzhaniye, parametry [Characteristics of legal discourse: boundaries, content, parameters]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’ – Historical and Social-Educational Idea, 2015, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–68 (in Russian).
12. Borisova L. A. Yuridicheskiy diskurs: osnovnyye kharakteristiki [Legal discourse: basic characteristics]. Yazyk, kommunikatsiya i sotsial’naya sreda [Language, communication and social environment]. Voronezh, 2016, pp. 133–151 (in Russian).
13. Chernyshev A. V. Yuridicheskiy diskurs i yego osnovnyye kharakteristiki [Legal discourse and its main characteristics]. Slovo.ru: Baltiyskiy aktsent – Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, 2016, pp. 22–28 (in Russian).
14. Kozhemyakin E. A. Yuridicheskiy diskurs kak kul’turnyy fenomen: struktura i smysloobrazovaniye [Legal discourse as a cultural phenomenon: structure and meaning formation]. Yurislingvistika – Legal Liguistics, 2011, pp. 131–14 (in Russian). URL: http://konference.siberia-expert.com/publ/ (accessed 16 March 2021).
15. Shlepnev D. N. Yuridicheskiy diskurs s tochki zreniya perevodchika: rabochaya perevodcheskaya tipologiya [Legal discourse from the point of view of a translator: working translation typology]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2018, no. 2(80), vol. 1., pp. 185–188 (in Russian).
16. Antropova V. V., Grosheva A. V., Zagidullina M. V., Krasnopeyeva Ye. S., Morozova A. A., Selyutin A. A., Panova Ye. Yu., Fedorov V. V., Sharafutdinova O. I., Mental’no-yazykovyye transformatsii russkoy lingvokul’turnoy lichnosti: poisk identichnosti v mediatizirovannom obshchestve [Mental and linguistic transformations of the Russian linguocultural personality: the search for identity in a mediatized society]. Scientific ed. M. V. Zagidullina. Chelyabinsk, CSU Publ., 2018. 340 p. (in Russian).
17. Mishankina N. A. Aspekty vzaimodeystviya mediasredy i professional’nykh soobshchestv (k postanovke problemy) [Aspects of interaction between the media environment and professional communities (to the problem statement)]. Voprosy zhurnalistiki – Russian Joural of Media Studies, 2019, no. 6, pp. 45–59. DOI: 10.17223/26188422/6/2 (in Russian).
18. Volkova E. V. Realizatsiya informatsionno-prosvetitel’skoy strategii vracha v mediadiskurse sotsial’noy seti [Implementation of the informational and educational strategy of the doctor in the media discourse of the social network]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Journal of Tomsk State University, 2021, no. 463, pp. 15–24. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/463/2 (in Russian).
19. Kozhemyakin E. A. Massovaya kommunikatsiya i mediadiskurs: metodologiya issledovaniya [Mass communication and media discourse: research methodology]. Nauchnyye vedomosti. Ser. “Gumanitarnyye nauki” – Scientific bulletin of Belgorod State University. Humanities Sciences, 2010, no. 12 (83), issue 6, pp. 13–21 (in Russian).
20. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Mediadiskurs kak ob”yekt lingvistiki i mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii [Media discourse as an object of linguistics and intercultural communication]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 2006, no. 2, pp. 21–33 (in Russian).
21. Kibrik A. A. Modus, zhanr i drugiye parametry klassifikatsii diskursov [Mode, genre and other parameters of the classification of discourses]. Voprosy jazykoznanija – Topics in the study of language, 2009, no. 2, pp. 3–21 (in Russian).
22. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Medialingvistika: teoriya, metody, napravleniya [Medialinguistics: theory, methods, directions]. Moscow, KDU, Dobrosvet Publ., 2020. 178 p. (in Russian). URL: https://bookonlime.ru/node/4824 (accessed 16 March 2021). DOI: htpp://doi.org/10.31453/kdu.ru.91304.0107
23. Nesterova N. G. Sovremennyy mediadiskurs: v poiskakh podkhoda k izucheniyu [Modern media discourse: in search of an approach to the study] Aktual’nyye protsessy v sotsial’noy i massovoy kommunikatsii, Tsentr teorii i praktiki rechevoy kommunikatsii (in Russian). URL: http://yspu.org/Современный язык в зеркале СМИ. Прикладные вопросы медиакультуры и медиаобразования – Ярославский педагогический университет (accessed 30 July 2021).
( 571.3 kB ) 
( 562.14 kB )
Issue: 6, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: THEORETICAL, APPLIED AND COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 97 — 104
Downloads: 1023