Direct tactics and their linguistic means to discredit the Biden administration (based on “Tucker Carlson Tonight”)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-4-84-91
Various communication strategies and tactics are implemented in modern political media to conduct information warfare. Moreover, they are used to govern the public opinion. A discrediting strategy and its tactics is one of the most frequently used strategy in political media. The article focuses on two direct tactics implementing a discrediting strategy: the tactics of negative forecasting, the tactics of deceived expectations. The purpose of the article is to investigate the means of performing the tactics of negative forecasting and the tactics of deceived expectations, which discredit the D. Biden administration directly. The corpus drawn upon is 229 scripts of “Tucker Carlson Tonight”, 743 pages in total. The empirical material of the study is 554 contexts, where both the tactics are performed. To analyze the material, we used a descriptive and comparative method along with contextual analysis techniques, as well as definition, semantic, lexical-stylistic and quantitative analysis. Most of the empirical data comprises contexts that implement the tactics of negative forecasting. In addition, there are some cases when both the tactics perform simultaneously. A set of linguistic means is used to implement the tactics of negative forecasting and of deceived expectations. These means include morphological, syntactic, lexical, and stylistic ones. To perform the tactics of negative forecasting and deceived expectations, the common language tools are: modal verbs can (could), may (might), will (would), the zero conditional and the first conditional, idioms, metaphors and epithets. The Future simple is used to perform the tactics of negative forecasting, whereas the tactics of deceived expectations is implemented by the Past simple. The peculiar stylistic means for the tactics of negative forecasting are euphemism, dysphemism, litote, extenuation. Stylistic contrast is common for the tactics of deceived expectations. The Biden administration is discredited by the tactics of negative forecasting more often than by the tactics of deceived expectations. The discrediting effect is maximized when these tactics are used simultaneously.
Keywords: English language, discrediting strategy, direct tactics, tactics of negative forecasting, tactics of deceived expectations, linguistic means, talk show
References:
1. Sheygal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Semiotics of political discourse. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2000. 433 p. (in Russian).
2. Ozyumenko V. I. Mediynyy diskurs v situatsii informatsionnoy voyny: ot manipulyatsii – k agressii [Media discourse in the situation of information war: from manipulation to aggression]. Vestnik RUDN – RUDN Journal, 2017, no. 1, pp. 203–220 (in Russian).
3. Lavrinova N. I. Persuazivnyye strategii i taktiki v politicheskom interv’yu konfrontatsionnogo tipa [Persuasive strategies and tactics in a political interview of a confrontational type]. Lingvistika teksta i diskursivnyy analiz: traditsii i perspektivy: sbornik nauchnykh statey. Otvetstvennyy redaktor V. E. Chernyavskaya [Text linguistics and discursive analysis: traditions and perspectives: a collection of scientific articles. Ed. V. E. Chernyavskaya]. Saint Petersburg, SPb GUEF Publ., 2007. Рp. 121–132 (in Russian).
4. Gun’kova D. Ye. Strategiya diskreditatsii kak dominanta diskursivnoy lichnosti amerikanskogo politicheskogo radiokommentatora [The strategy of discrediting as a dominant feature of the discursive personality of an American political radio commentator]. Diskurs, 2020, no. 6, pp. 113–125 (in Russian).
5. Beard A. The language of politics. London, Routledge, 2000. 134 p.
6. Ruzhentseva N. B. Diskreditiruyushchiye taktiki i priyemy v rossiyskom politicheskom diskurse [Discrediting tactics and techniques in Russian political discours]. Yekaterinburg, Znaniye Publ., 2004. 294 p. (in Russian).
7. Mikhalova O. L. Politicheskiy diskurs kak sfera realizatsii manipulyativnogo vozdeystviya. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Political discourse as a sphere for the implementation of manipulative influence. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Irkutsk, 2004. 289 p. (in Russian).
8. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006. 320 p. (in Russian).
9. Parshina O. N. Strategii i taktiki rechevogo povedeniya sovremennoy politicheskoy elity Rossii. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Strategies and tactics of speech behavior of the modern political elite of Russia. Diss. doc. philol. sci.]. Saratov, 2005. 325 p. (in Russian).
10. Dem’yankov V. Z. Politicheskiy diskurs kak predmet politologicheskoy filologii [Political discourse as a subject of political science philology]. Politicheskaya nauka – Political science, 2002, no. 3, pp. 31–44 (in Russian).
11. Yegorova E. N. Rechevaya agressiya i strategiya diskreditatsii (na primere analiza gazetnykh publikatsiy) [Speech aggression and the strategy of discrediting (on the example of the analysis of newspaper publications)]. Yazyk i tekst – Language and text, 2015, no. 3, pp. 69–75 (in Russian). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/langt/archive/2015_n3/langt_2015_n3_Egorova.pdf (accessed 1 February 2023).
12. Tikhonova S. A. Strategiya diskreditatsii kak sposob sozdaniya negativnogo obraza Rossii v britanskom massmediynom diskurse, posvyashchennom Olimpiyskim igram v Tokio [The strategy of discredit as a way to create a negative image of Russia in the British mass media discourse dedicated to the Olympic Games in Tokyo]. Politicheskaya lingvistika – Political linguistics, 2021, no. 5 (89), pp. 168–174 (in Russian).
13. Lisyutkina I. S. Dinamika realizatsii strategii diskreditatsii v mediadiskurse 1950–2019 gg. (na materiale russkogo i angliyskogo yazykov). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [The dynamics of the implementation of the discrediting strategy in the media discourse in 1950–2019 (on the material of Russian and English languages). Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Saratov, 2021. 247 p. (in Russian).
14. Chebyshev F. A. Semantika ozhidaniya i sredstva yeyo vyrazheniya v russkom yazyke. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [The semantics of expectation and the means of its expression in Russian. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Perm, 2017. 206 p. (in Russian).
15. Kobenko Yu. V. Teoreticheskiye osnovy funktsional’noy stilistiki: uchebnik [Theoretical foundations of functional stylistics: textbook]. Tomsk, TPU Publ., 2023. 296 p. (in Russian).
16. Bol’shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya 2004–2017 [Great Russian Encyclopedia 2004–2017] (in Russian). URL: https://old.bigenc.ru (accessed 15 January 2023).
17. Novikov D. N. Semantika modal’nykh glagolov shall i should v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke: prototipicheskiy podkhod [Semantics of the modal verbs shall and should in modern English: a prototypical approach]. Filologicheskiye nauki v MGIMO – Philological Sciences at MGIMO, 2018, no. 1 (13), pp. 38–45 (in Russian).
( 391.82 kB ) 
( 383.37 kB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ROMAN AND GERMANIC LANGUAGES
Pages: 84 — 91
Downloads: 348