Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 07.11.2025
Home Issues 2023 Year Issue №6 Problems of expressive syntax on the example of the speeches of D. Trump and J. Biden for Christmas 2017 and 2022
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Problems of expressive syntax on the example of the speeches of D. Trump and J. Biden for Christmas 2017 and 2022

Afonina Olga Igorevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-6-31-38

Information About Author:

Afonina O. I., postgraduate student, Moscow State University (ul. Kolmogorova, 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991).

The article is devoted to the study of expressive syntax in political discourse on the example of two speeches by Donald Trump and Joe Biden with congratulations on Christmas in 2017 and 2022. The author aims to study the potential of expressiveness of the used syntax of politicians on the example of word combinations and parenthetical additions. This goal is achieved through the analysis of the categories of functioning of phrases and parenthetical contributions on specific examples from the relevant speeches. The conducted analysis helps to draw a conclusion about the degree of importance of the syntactic means of expressiveness in political discourse. In the course of the analysis, we first analysed the phrases with inherent expressiveness and then moved on to the phrases with adherent expressiveness and presented such categories of phrase functioning as the following examples: the category of clichéd, idiomatic and connotative. On the basis of these categories, the functioning of phrases in various stylistic figures (amplification, repetition, polysyndeton, growth, antithesis) was revealed and illustrated in the examples from two political speeches which relate to one topic (Christmas). Based on the expressiveness and the content of parenthetical contributions, the categories of reference, exemplification, deliberation and their role in the statements of politicians were singled out. It was concluded that phrases are the basis for creating an emotionally charged sentence or text. The syntactic expressiveness of speech in politics increases the manipulative effect on the listeners and, thus, it becomes easier for the speaker to realize his intentions.

Keywords: political discourse, parenthetical additions, the functioning of phrases, expressive syntax, stylistic figures, text-binding elements, concepts

References:

1. Dmitriyeva M. I., Dubrovskaya V. V. Kommunikativnyye strategii manipulirovaniya na primere amerikanskoy izbiratel’noy kampanii D. Trampa i Hk. Klinton [Communication Strategies of Manipulation on the Example of the American Election Campaign of D. Trump and H. Clinton]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2020, no. 7, pp. 180–184 (in Russian).

2. Deyk T. A. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow, 2000. 130 p. (in Russian).

3. Fairclough N. Language and Power. L., N.Y., Longman Group UK Limited, 1989. 231 p.

4. Chudinov A. P. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2003. Pp. 26–42 (in Russian).

5. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the human world]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).

6. Shapochkin D. V. Kognitivnaya model’ politicheskogo diskursa [Cognitive model of political discourse]. Aktual’nyye problemy lingvistiki [Actual problems of linguistics]. Ural’skiye lingvisticheskiye chteniya – 2005: Materialy ezhegodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Ekaterinburg, 1–2 fevralya 2005, No. 18 [Current problems of linguistics. Ural linguistic readings – 2005: materials of the annual scientific conference]. Ekaterinburg, 2005. Pp. 126–127 (in Russian).

7. Ivanova S. V., Konova M. A. Antikrizisnyye manipulyativnyye strategii v professional’nykh PR-tekstakh (po materialam ofitsial’nogo sayta kompanii FANNIE MAE) [Anti-crisis manipulative strategies in professional PR texts (based on materials from the official website of the FANNIE MAE company)]. Politicheskaya lingvistika: vypusk 2. Glavnyy redaktor A. P. Chudinov [Political linguistics: issue 2. Chief editor A. P. Chudinov]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2010. Pp. 165–172 (in Russian)

8. Sheygal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Semiotics of political discourse. Diss. doc. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2000. Pp. 23–36 (in Russian).

9. Sternin I. A. Vvedeniye v rechevoye vozdeystviye [Introduction to speech influence]. Voronezh, 2001. 143 p. (in Russian).

10. Zaripov R. I. Osobennosti metaforicheskogo manipulyativnogo vozdeystviya v politicheskom diskurse [Features of metaphorical manipulative influence in political discourse]. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2014, no. 2, pp. 145–158 (in Russian).

11. Aleksandrova O. V. Problemy ekspressivnogo sintaksisa: na materiale angliyskogo yazyka: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov institutov i fakul’tetov inostrannykh yazykov [Problems of expressive syntax: on the material of the English language: a textbook for students of institutes and faculties of foreign languages]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2009. 211 p. (in Russian).

12. Vinogradov V. V. Itogi obsuzhdeniya voprosov stilistiki [Results of the discussion of questions of style]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Topics in the Study of Language, 1953, no. 1, pp. 132–156 (in Russian).

13. Remarks by President Biden in Christmas Address to the Nation, Dec. 22, 2022. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/12/22/remarks-by-president-biden-in-christmas-address-to-the-nation/ (accessed 22 January 2023).

14. President Trump at the National tree-lighting ceremony, Nov. 30, 2017. URL: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/jesus-birth-changed-the-course-of-human-history-trumps-extraordinary-2017-c/ (accessed 22 January 2023).

15. Nikitina K. V. Rechevaya manipulyatsiya kak predmet lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Speech manipulation as a subject of linguistic research]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 2006, no. 4, pp. 23–46 (in Russian).

16. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya [Archeology of knowledge]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 1996. 187 p. (in Russian).

17. Dem’yankov V. Z. Narrativ i diskurs [Narrative and discourse]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2022, no. 4, pp. 5–16 (in Russian).

18. Sun’ Yu., Kalinin O. I., Ignatenko A. V. Ispol’zovaniye indeksov metaforichnosti dlya analiza rechevogo vozdeystviya metafory v tekstakh publichnykh vystupleniy politikov [The use of metaphorical indexes for the analysis of the speech impact of metaphor in the texts of public speeches of politicians]. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 250–277 (in Russian). doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277

19. Krasnykh V. V. Lingvokul’tura kak diskursoobrazuyushchiy fenomen [Linguistic culture as a discourse-forming phenomenon]. LA TEUM 2015: Research and Practice in Multidisciplinary Discourse. Materialy 12 mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii Lingvisticheskoiy assotsiatsii prepodavateleiy angliyskogo yazyka MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. Otvetstvennyy redaktor O. V. Aleksandrova; redaktory E. V. Mikhaylovskaya, I. N. Fomina [LA TEUM 2015: Research and Practice in Multidisciplinary Discourse: materials of the 12th International Conference of the Linguistic Association of Teachers of English at Lomonosov Moscow State University. Executive editor O. V. Alexandrova; editors E. V. Mikhailovskaya, I. N. Fomina]. Moscow, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2015. Pp. 7–15 (in Russian).

20. Vodak R. Vzaimosvyaz’ “diskurs – obshchestvo”: kognitivnyy podkhod k kriticheskomu diskurs-analizu [Discourse-Society Relationship: A Cognitive Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis]. Sovremennaya politicheskaya lingvistika. Redaktor Budayev E. V., Chudinov A. P. [Modern political linguistics. Eds E. V. Budaev, A. P. Chudinov]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2006. Pp. 123–136 (in Russian).

21. Voroshilova M. B. Kreolizovannyy tekst: aspekty izucheniya [Creolized text: aspects of study]. Politicheskaya lingvistika: vypusk 20. Glavnyy redaktor A. P. Chudinov [Political linguistics: volume 20. Chief editor A. P. Chudinov]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2006. Pp. 180–189 (in Russian).

22. Gar’kovskaya T. N. O kognitivnom potentsiale sushchestvitel’nykh s shirokim znacheniyem i ikh funktsionirovanii v diskurse (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [On the cognitive potential of nouns with a broad meaning and their functioning in discourse] (in Russian). URL: http://www.philology.ru/linguistics3/garkovskaya-04.htm (accessed 22 January 2023).

afonina__olga__igorevna_31_38_6_230_2023.pdf ( 386.52 kB ) afonina__olga__igorevna_31_38_6_230_2023.zip ( 382.84 kB )

Issue: 6, 2023

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: COMPARATIVE AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS

Pages: 31 — 38

Downloads: 732

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU