Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.07.2025
Home Issues 2023 Year Issue №6 Academic military-educational discourse: towards a description model
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Academic military-educational discourse: towards a description model

Emer Julia Antonovna, Andrievskaya Svetlana Anatolyevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-6-49-57

Information About Author:

Emer Yu. A., Doctor of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor, National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634000). Andrievskaya S. A., graduate student, National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634000).

Тhe article is devoted to the description of the academic military-educational discourse as a speech activity aimed at training officers of the highest command. The academic military-educational discourse, due to the cognitive and communicative focus of the research, is analyzed by the authors based on the model of describing institutional discourse developed by V. I. Karasik. The materials of the study were methodological developments, summaries of classes of the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (VAGSH of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation) from the personal archives of the authors. In the main part of the article, considerable attention is paid to identifying specific features of the academic military-educational discourse, the purpose of which is to acquire new knowledge by officers in the field of operational and strategic levels, as well as training officers of the armed forces of the highest military qualification, specialists in the field of defense and security of the country in the aspect of management practices. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that for the first time the academic military-educational discourse is analyzed, its main discourse-forming characteristics are described. The basis of the allocation of academic military educational discourse within the framework of military educational discourse is the classification of military education adopted in Russia: primary, secondary, higher. It is the specificity of the learning process taking place at different levels of education that has caused the need to separate the academic military-educational discourse into a separate version of the military-educational discourse. As a result of the analysis, the authors of the article identified the purpose, strategies, participants of the discourse, described the chronotope, values and genre organization of the academic military educational discourse. Since academic military-educational discourse, like other types of military-educational discourse, is a polysemiotic education, the authors introduce the parameter “communication code” into the model of describing academic military-educational discourse, which emphasizes the essential role of nonverbal communication code for establishing successful communicative clarity between its participants. In the work, according to the presented model, the features of the academic military-educational discourse, the communicative behavior of its participants, as well as key communicative strategies and its genre organization are characterized. The results of the study will be of interest to specialists working in the field of discourse analysis.

Keywords: military discourse, military educational discourse, V. I. Karasik model, institutional discourse, communication, military education

References:

1. Olyanich A. V. Prezentatsionnyye strategii v voyenno-politicheskom diskurse [Presentation strategies in military-political discourse]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznaniye – Scientific Journal of Volgograd state University. Linguistics, 2003, no. 3, pp. 119–126 (in Russian).

2. Osipchuk А. Е. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskaya koordinatsiya ustnykh i pis’mennykh rechevykh zhanrov v voyennom delovom i khudozhestvennom duskyrsakh [Communicative and pragmatic coordination of oral and written speech genres in military business and artistic discourses]. Volgograd, 2022. 27 p. (in Russian).

3. Ulanov А. V. Russkiy voyennyiy diskurs XIX – nachala XX veka: struktura, spetsifika, evolutsiya [Russian Military Discourse of the XIX – early XX century: structure, specifics, evolution]. Omsk, 2014. 40 p. (in Russian).

4. Fakhrutdinova D. R. Strukturirovaniye zhanrovogo prostranstva voyennogo institutsional’nogo diskursa [Structuring the genre space of military institutional discourse]. Uchyonyye zapiski KSU. Ser.: Gumanitarnyye nauki – Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series, 2008, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 259–266 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11482181 (accessed 3 February 2023).

5. Shashok L. A. Kharakternyye osobennosti voyennogo diskursa (na materiale rabot otechestvennykh lingvistov) [Characteristic features of military discourse (based on the works of Russian linguists)]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2018, no. 6 (72), pp. 116–119 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36722013 (accessed 01 February 2023).

6. Yusupova T. S. Stryktyrnyye osobennosti voyennogo diskursa [Structural features of military discourse]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsetra Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk – Izvestia RAS SamSC, 2009, vol. 11, no. 4 (4), pp. 1055–1057 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strukturnye-osobennosti-voennogo-diskursa (accessed 2 February 2023).

7. Mishkurov E. N. Sovremennyy voyenno-politicheskiy diskurs: nominatsiya, funktsii, deviatsiya yazyka, transl’yat [Modern military-political discourse: nomination, functions, language deviation, transl’yat]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 22: Teoriya perevoda – Moscow University Translation Studies Bulletin, 2020, no. 2, pp. 88–105 (in Russian). URL: http://vestnik-translation.ru/articles/article/1051/ (accessed 3 February 2023).

8. Naumova K. A. Kontent-analiz voyenno-politicheskogo i voyenno-publitsisticheskogo formatov diskursa v sopostavitel’nom aspekte [Content analysis of military-political and military-journalistic discourse formats in a comparative aspect]. Politi¬cheskaya lingvistika, 2019, no. 3 (75), pp. 96–105 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38554820 (accessed 2 Marh 2023).

9. Khomutova T. N., Naumova K. A. Voyenno-politicheskiy diskurs kak osobyy tip diskursa [Military-political discourse as a special type of discourse]. Vestnik YuUrGU, Seriya: Lingvistika – Bulletin of South Ural State University. Linguistics, 2017, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 49–53 (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29930347 (accessed 1 February 2023).

10. Goncharova M. V. Statusnaya kharakteristika zhanrov voyenno-delovoiy rechi v voyennom institutsional’nom diskurse [Status characteristics of genres of military-business speech in military institutional discourse]. Kant, 2022, no. 3(44), pp. 227–233 (in Russian).

11. Dubrova Yu. Yu. Strukturno-soderzhatel’naya spetsifika mnogokomponentnykh terminov v voyennom diskurse [Structural and content specificity of multicomponent terms in military discourse]. Vestnik MGLU – Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2012, no. 638, pp. 137–144 (in Russian).

12. Mithcell P. D., Shevchenko M. A., Zagainov S. S. Obucheniye inoyazychnomu voyennomu diskursu [Teaching foreign-language military discourse]. Yazyk i kultura – Language and culture, 2020, no. 51, pp. 265–287 (in Russian).

13. Strelkovskiy G. M. Teoriya i praktika voyennogo perevoda. Nemetskiy yazyk [Theory and practice of military translation. German Language]. Moscow, Voyenizdat Publ., 1979. 272 p. (in Russian).

14. Manaenko G. N. Tekst, rechevaya deyatel’nost’, diskurks [Text, speech activity, discourse]. Samara, 2003. P. 6–14 (in Russian).

15. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, 2002, 331 p. (in Russian).

16. Gudina О. А. Spetsifika kontroliryushchey strategii v pedagogicheskom diskurse [The specifics of the controlling strategy in pedagogical discourse]. Filologiya i lingvistika v sovremennom obshchestve: materialy III Mezhduanrodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (g. Moskva, noyabr’ 2014 g.) [Philology and linguistics in modern society: materials of the III International Scientific Conference (Moscow, November 2014)]. Moscow, Buki-Vedi Publ., 2014. Pp. 57–60 (in Russian).

17. Ognevoye porazheniye [Fire damage]. Voyennaya entsiklopediya: v 8 tomakh. Ministerstvo oborony RF, In-t voyennoy istorii; red. kom. P. S. Grachev i dr. [Military encyclopedia: in 8 volumes. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Institute of Military History; ed. com. P. S. Grachev et al.]. Moscow, Voyenizdat Publ., 1994. 639 p. (in Russian).

18. Pinchuk А. Zdes’ nauchat pobezhdat’ [They will teach you how to win here]. Krasnaya zvezda, 2019, 4 sep., p. 2 (in Russian). URL: http://redstar.ru/zdes-nauchat-pobezhdat/ (accessed 4 February 2023).

emer_julia_antonovna_49_57_6_230_2023.pdf ( 439.56 kB ) emer_julia_antonovna_49_57_6_230_2023.zip ( 435.09 kB )

Issue: 6, 2023

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 49 — 57

Downloads: 679

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU