Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 22.05.2025
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №4 PRAGMATIC FACTORS AFFECTING CASE MARKERS DROP IN KOREAN
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

PRAGMATIC FACTORS AFFECTING CASE MARKERS DROP IN KOREAN

Rudnitskaya Elena Leonidovna

Information About Author:

The examples of the drop of case markers mainly for direct cases are given and the the phenomenon of the drop of case markers in the Korean language is considered. Referential, communicative, and other pragmatic/ non-syntactical factors causing such drop are studied. These factors are not only valid for Korean but also for a big numer of typologicallly divergent languages.

Keywords: case marker, drop, pragmatics, morphology, syntax, communicative structure

References:

1. Yoon J. H.-S. Nominal, verbal and cross-categorical affi xation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1995, vol. 4, issue 4, pp. 325–356.

2. Sohn H.-M. The Korean language. Cambridge (Mass.), CUP, 1999. 468 p.

3. Erteschik-Shir N. Focus structure and scope. Grammar of focus. Ed. by G. Rebuschi, L. Tuller. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1999. P. 119–150.

4. Nikolaeva I. Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics, 2001, vol 39, issue 1, pp. 1–49.

5. Serdobol’skaya N. V., Toldova S. V. Certain characteristic features of marking of a direct object in Mari. Linguistic immensity. Ed. by T. B. Agranat. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2002, pp. 106–125 (in Russian).

6. Schьtze C. On Korean ‘case stacking’: the varied functions of the particles ka and lul. The Linguistic Review, 2001, vol. 18, issue 3, pp. 193–232.

7. Ahn H.-D., Cho S. A syntactic account of the properties of bare nominals in discourse. Proceedings of the 21-st Pacifi c Asia Conference on Linguistics, Information and Communication. Korea, Korean Society for Language and Information, 2007. Pp. 57–66.

8. Nilson B. Defi niteness and reference in relation to the Turkish accusative. New in the foreign linguistics. Vol. XIX. Problems of modern Turcology. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987, pp. 426–443 (in Russian).

9. Aissen J. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2003, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 435–483.

10. Kibrik A. E. Constants and varianbles of language. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2003. 720 p. (in Russian).

11. Park B.-S. A Constraint-Based Lexical Approach to Floating Quantifi ers. Proceedings of the 10th Pacifi c Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. Ed. by B. K. T’sou, T. B. Y. Bai. City University of Hong-Kong, Language Information Sciences Research Centre, 1995. Pp. 67–77.

12. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Maria’s ring of gold: adnominal possession and non-anchoring relations in European languages. Possessives and beyond: semantics and syntax. Ed. by J. Kim, B. Partee, Yu. Lander. Amherst, GLSA Publishers, 2004. Pp. 155–181.

13. Kwon S.-N., Zribi-Hertz A. Differential function marking, Case, and Information structure: Evidence from Korean. Language, 2008, vol. 84, issue 2, pp. 258–299.

14. Kim Y.-H. Overt and covert case in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 1998, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 177–237.

15. Kholodovich A. A. Essays on Korean grammar. Moscow, Izd. lit. na inostr. yazike Publ., 1954. 320 p. (in Russian).

16. Rudnitskaya E. L. Arguable issues of Korean grammar: theoretical problems and ways of their solutions. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2010. 294 p. (in Russian).

17. Bruneton E. Yu. The semantics of case relations in Modern Korean. Diss. cand. philol. sci. Moscow, Institute of oriental studies RAS, 2007. 216 p. (in Russian).

18. Yoon J. H.-S. Raising of major arguments in Korean (and Japanese). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2007, vol. 25, issue 3, pp. 615–653.

19. Lee Ch. Contrastive topic and proposition structure. Asymmetry in grammar, vol. 1. Ed. by A.-M. Di Sciullo. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2002. Pp. 345–372.

20. Rudnitskaya E. L. Communicative and syntactic properties of the construction with a classifi er in Korean. Man and language in the communicative space. Scientifi c papers. Issue 4 (IV International readings in memory of R. T. Grib (192–1995)). Ed. by B. Ya. Sharifullin. Krasnoyarsk, Sibirskiy federal’niy universitet, 2013. Pp. 393–398. (in Russian).

21. Serdobol’skaya N. Towards the typology of raising: a functional approach. New challenges in Typology, v. 2. Ed. by A. Arkhipov, P. Epps. Berlin, Mouton de Gruiter, 2008. Pp. 269–295.

rudnitskaya_e._l._80_84_4_145_2014.pdf ( 438.94 kB ) rudnitskaya_e._l._80_84_4_145_2014.zip ( 433.2 kB )

Issue: 4, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ALTAIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 80 — 84

Downloads: 1239

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU