Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 20.01.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №2 MODEL OF RESEARCH INTO AN ARTISTIC IMAGE IN NATIONAL POETIC LINGUOCULTURE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

MODEL OF RESEARCH INTO AN ARTISTIC IMAGE IN NATIONAL POETIC LINGUOCULTURE

Tomberg O.V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-2-31-36

Information About Author:

Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (ul. Mira, 19, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620002). E-mail: olgatomberg@yandex.ru

The article puts forward a model of studying a n artistic image in national poetic linguoculture. The model comprises three levels: сharacter-contextual, linguopoetic and conceptual. Each of the levels offers research into different layers of the image. The first level aims at describing character repertoire of the image, the second level focuses on its linguostylistic characteristics and the third level provides research into its conceptual content. Application of the model contributes to understanding of a literary image as a complex phenomenon – a projection of three semiotic systems: poetics, language and culture. Thus, each of the model layers is characterized by its own methods of research. Contextual analysis is a dominant method of research on the first level. At this stage of analysis major focus is given to constructing contextual setting of the image. Thus, the following structure of integrated imagological context is proposed in the article. Names of characters and their second naming varieties constitute its nuclear zone, speech portraits represent its central zone and a peripheral area comprises narrative portraits. Quantitative and linguostylistic analyses dominate on the second level of imagological research. At this stage the analysis is split in two parts: research into lexical specifics of imagological contexts and its stylistic peculiarities. A conceptual analysis is used on the third level of imagological research and it aims at establishing links and means of connecting the image to national culture through a notion of linguocultural concept.

Keywords: artistic image, character, imagological contexts, linguostylistics, consept, imagological conceptual space

References:

1. Losev A. F. Vvedeniye v obshchuyu teoriyu yazykovykh modeley [Introduction into general theory of language models]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2010. 296 p. (in Russian).

2. Komarova Z. I. Metodologiya, metod, metodika i tekhnologiya nauchnykh issledovaniy v lingvistike [Methodology, method and technology of scientifi c research in linguistics]. Ekaterinburg, UrFU Publishing House Publ., 2012. 818 p. (in Russian).

3. Gal’perin I. R. Tekst kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2004. 144 p. (in Russian).

4. Churilina L. N. Antropotsentrizm khudozhestvennogo teksta kak printsip organizatsii ego leksicheskoy struktury. Dis. dokt. fi lol. nauk [Anthropocentrism of fi ction text as a principle of organizing its lexical structure. Thesis of doc. philol. sci.]. St. Petersburg, 2002. 513 p. (in Russian).

5. Lukin V. A. Khudozhestvennyy tekst: Osnovy lingvisticheskoy teorii i elementy analiza [Fiction text: basics of linguistic theory and elements of analysis]. Moscow, Os’-89 PUbl., 1999. 192 p. (in Russian).

6. Freydenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myth and literature of ancient times]. Moscow, Izd. fi rma “Vostochnaya literatura” RAN Publ., 1998. 800 p. (in Russian).

7. Goncharova E. A. Puti lingvostilisticheskogo vyrazheniya kategoriy avtor – personazh v khudozhestvennom tekste [Ways of linguistic explication of the category author – character in fi ction text]. Tomsk, Publishing house of Tomsk University Publ., 1984. 149 p. (in Russian).

8. Nikitin M. V. Osnovy lingvisticheskoy teorii znacheniya [Basics of linguistic theory of meaning]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1988. 168 p. (in Russian).

9. Kubryakova E. S. Yazyk i znaniye. Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge. On the way to acquiring knowledge about language: parts of speech from the cognitive point of view. The role of language in the world perception]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. 560 p. (in Russian)

10. Lotman Yu. M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta [Structure of the fi ction text]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1970. 384 p. (in Russian).

11. Lotman Yu. M. O poetakh i poezii. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta [About poets and poetry. Analysis of poetic text]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo – SPb Publ., 1996. 846 p. (in Russian).

12. Zhenett Zh. Figury. V 2 tomakh. Tom 1–2 [Figures. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1–2]. Moscow, Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh Publ., 1998. 944 p. (in Russian).

13. Karasik V. I., Prokhvacheva O. G., Zubkova Ya. V., Grabarova Ye. V. Inaya mental’nost’ [Another mentality]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2005. 352 p. (in Russian).

14. Vorob’ev V. V. Lingvokul’turologiya: Teoriya i metody [Linguoculturology: theory and practice]. Moscow, Publishing House of RUDN Publ., 2008. 336 p. (in Russian).

15. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Moscow, Vostok – Zapad Publ., 2010. 314 p. (in Russian).

tomberg_o._v._31_36_2_179_2017.pdf ( 423.82 kB ) tomberg_o._v._31_36_2_179_2017.zip ( 417.6 kB )

Issue: 2, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 31 — 36

Downloads: 1428

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU