Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 21.05.2025
Home Issues 2020 Year Issue №3 “BLESSED INNOCENCE”: A SMALL MAN CHARACTER IN THE MODERN BRITISH LITERATURE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

“BLESSED INNOCENCE”: A SMALL MAN CHARACTER IN THE MODERN BRITISH LITERATURE

Moskalenko Olga Aleksandrovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-3-86-95

Information About Author:

Moskalenko O. A., candidate of philology, associate professor, Sevastopol State University (ul. Universitetskaya, 33, Sevastopol, Russian Federation, 299053). E-mail: kerulen@bk.ru

Introduction. In the modern novel “The Senility of Vladimir P” a typical image of a “small man” is created and the myth of Russia as a multi-layered system of stereotypes recognizable by the Western recipient is constructed. The purpose of the study is to characterize the stereotypical image of the Russian “small man” in the modern British novel and to determine its functions in the meta-myth of Russia. Material and methods. The methodology of comparative studies, in particular, imagology is used as its the interdisciplinary nature allows one to study the image of the “Other” in the social, cultural and literary consciousness of another country at intertextual, contextual and textual levels upon the concept of stereotypes (according to J. Leerssen). “The Senility of Vladimir P” by M. Honig is a material for research. Results and discussion. Under a scandalous headline, the author offers us a story about life in Russia through the prism of the theme of “small man”. The main character, Nikolay Sheremetyev, is not inclined to reflection until the situation of loss appears and his beloved nephew is arrested. From this moment on, the narrative is gaining momentum, the main character is changing: reality acquires more and more grotesque features, and reader witnesses painful transformation of Sheremetyev, the “small man”, the last honest person in Russia, who makes a deal with his conscience and begins to act within the framework of English-Saxon tradition. The image of the “Other” is presented by Honig precisely from the perspective of the Anglo-Saxon tradition in which all the other characters are actually written out: Russians only by entourage and consistent with the Western stereotype, but infected with Western individualism. The characters of the novel are classified by type depending on the model of behavior and prototype. Conclusion. M. Honig builds a grotesque, absurd image of Russia in the middle of the XXI century. Ethnotype characters act in conditional situations without author pretending to psychologize the image and reveal characters, because they must create the most complete, comprehensive picture of Russian reality, reflect Russian national features as they fit into the British myth of Russia that is familiar to the British. Honig constructs the ethnotype of Russian citizens of the mid-XXIst century from 1) the image of a small man (Nikolai Sheremetyev), traditional for Russian literature; 2) the media image of Russian elite formed mainly by Western media and Russian liberal media; 3) an exaggerated and schematic image of a typical Russian, featured in Western cinema of the late twentieth century. Before us there is a conflict not only of different attitudes, but the opposition of the Russian and English (more broadly Anglo- Saxon) worlds at the cultural and civilizational level. Honig’s novel is an example of secondary actualization, when a fiction text constructed under the influence of the media begins to be perceived as a non-fiction model, becoming a kind of simulacrum of reality.

Keywords: imagology, ethnotype, image of Russia, British literature, small man, myth, Russian myth

References:

1. Mikhal’skaya N. P. Obraz Rossii v angliyskoy khudozhestvennoy literature IX–XIX vv. [Image of Russia in English Fiction of the IX–XIX century]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 1995. 152 p. (in Russian).

2. Khabibullina L. F. Natsional’nyy mif v sovremennoy angliyskoy literature [National myth in the modern English literature]. Vestnik Tatarskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2010, no. 20 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/natsionalnyy-mif-v-sovremennoy-angliyskoy-literature (accessed 1 October 2019).

3. Bochkareva N. S., Proskurnin B. M. Obraz i mif v angliyskoy literature o Rossii [Image and myth in English literature about Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, 2015, iss. 4 (32), pp. 142–146 (in Russian).

4. Polyakova O. A. Obraz Rossii v literature Velikobritanii: imagologicheskiye aspekty issledovaniy N. P. Mikhal’skoy [Image of Russia in the literature of Great Britain: imagological research by P. Mikhalskaya]. Kontsept – Koncept, 2016, no. 8 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obraz-rossii-v-literature-velikobritanii-imagologicheskie-aspekty-issledovaniy-n-p-mihalskoy (accessed 1 October 2019).

5. Koroleva C. Rossiya i russkiye v khudozhestvennom mire Dzhozefa Konrada [Russia and russians in Joseph Conrad’s literary world]. Quaestio Rossica, 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 958–973. DOI 10.15826/qr.2017.4.261. (in Russian).

6. Koroleva S. B. Mif o Rossii v britanskoy literature (1790-e – 1920-e gody). Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Russian myth in British literature. Abstract of thesis of doct. philol. sci.]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2014. 38 p. (in Russian).

7. Krasavchenko T. Uil’yam Dzhekhardi: angliyskiy pisatel’ s russkim aktsentom – o revolyutsii i Grazhdanskoy voyne [William Gerhardie: an English Writer with a Russian Accent – on the Revolution and Civil War]. Quaestio Rossica, 2017, vol. 5,no. 4, pp. 941–957 (in Russian). DOI 10.15826/qr.2017.4.260.

8. Lukov Vl. A. Russkaya literatura: genezis dialoga s evropeyskoy kul’turoy [Russian Literature: Genesis of Dialogue with European Culture]. Ed. By Val. Lukov. Moscow, Moscow University for the Humanities Publ., 2006. 100 p. (in Russian).

9. Kozlova A. A. Imagologicheskiy metod v issledovaniyakh literatury i kul’tury [Methods of Imagology in the Research of Literature and Culture]. Observatoriya kul’tury – Observatory of Culture, 2015, no. 3, pp. 114–118 (in Russian).

10. Leersen J. Imagology: On using ethnicity to make sense of the world. Iberical, Revue d’études ibériques et ibéro-américaines, 2016, no. 10, pp. 13–31.

11. Honig M. The Senility of Vladimir P. Kindle Edition. New York: Pegasus Books, 2007. 336 p.

12. Oshchepkov A. R. Imagologiya [Imagology]. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye, 2010, no. 1, pp. 251–253 (in Russian).

13. Dyserinck H. Imagology and the Problem of Ethnic Identity. URL: https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/podzim2009/NIDCC03_01/um/2_Dyserinck.pdf (accessed 1 October 2019).

14. Fishman B. A Novel Imagines Putin Is Retired and Has Dementia. The New York Times, August 19, 2016. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/books/review/senility-of-vladimir-p-michael-honig.html (accessed 1 October 2019).

15. Volkov S. Istoriya russkoy kul’tury v tsarstvovaniye Romanovykh: 1613–1917 [A History of Russian Culture under the Romanovs: 1613–1917]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2011. 320 p. (in Russian).

16. Shurupova O. S. Obraz “malen’kogo cheloveka” v peterburgskom i londonskom tekstakh [Image of a “small man” in texts about St. Petersburg and London]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Cherepovets State University Bulletin, 2014, no. 4, pp. 120–123 (in Russian).

17. Maye B. The Senility of Vladimir P by Michael Honig review: satire on Putin’s regime. The Irish Times, June 4, 2016. URL: https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/the-senility-of-vladimir-p-by-michael-honig-review-satire-on-putin-s-regime-1.2671919 (accessed 1 October 2019).

18. Taplin Ph. The Senility of Vladimir P by Michael Honig review – a topical tale of corruption. The Guardian, March 12, 2016. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/mar/12/the-senility-of-vladimir-p-by-michael-honig-review (accessed 1 October 2019)

19. Zilberbourg O. Review: The Senility of Vladimor Putin. The Common, December 17, 2016. URL: https://www.thecommononline.org/review-the-senility-of-vladimir-putin/ (accessed 1 October 2019).

20. Baudrillard J. Simulyakry i simulyatsiya [Simulacra and Simulation]. Moscow, Postum Publ., 2018. 240 p. (in Russian).

moskalenko_o._a._86_95_3_209_2020.pdf ( 426.54 kB ) moskalenko_o._a._86_95_3_209_2020.zip ( 419.67 kB )

Issue: 3, 2020

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF LITERARY CRITICISM

Pages: 86 — 95

Downloads: 1091

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU