Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.05.2025
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №5 TRENDS IN THE FORMATION OF MODERN CONCEPTS OF RATIONALITY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

TRENDS IN THE FORMATION OF MODERN CONCEPTS OF RATIONALITY

Vorobyova Galina Sergeevna, Lisovskaya E. G.

Information About Author:

There is no interpretation of rationality shared by everyone in economics. This article analyzes the ideas of rationality in Western and Russian economy. The article deals with the problems of rationality. Particular attention is paid to changes in the way of rationality in the context of contemporary realities. Тhe authors have developed a method for construction of a spatial Model of the rational coordination of interests. This allows to determine the criteria of rationality.

Keywords: model of human, rationality, organic rationality, organic rationality, limit rationality, types of rationality, irrationality

References:

1. Vittikh V. A. Paradigm of limited rationality of decision-making – 1. Samara State Technical University Bulletin (Technical science series), 2009, no. 3 (25), pp. 22–31 (in Russian).

2. Kleyner G. B. Evolution of institutional systems. Moscow, 2004 (in Russian).

3. Avtonomov V. S. Model of the person in economic science. New generation: economists, political scientists, philosophers, 1996, no. 2, vol. 1, pp. 3–40 (in Russian).

4. Homo Institutus. The person institutional / Under the editorship of O. V. Inshakov. Moscow, 2005 (in Russian).

5. Bychenkov V. M. Institutes. Supercollective formations and impersonal forms of social subjectivity. Moscow, 1996 (in Russian).

6. Lisovskaya E. G., Roshchina G. S. Russian scientific thought and western social utopian: compliance of ideas of the person to formation tendencies of “new economy”. Tomsk State University Bulletin, 2013, no. 370 (May), page 124–131 (in Russian).

7. Historical types of rationality / ed. V. A. Lektorsky. Vol. 1. Moscow, IF RAS Publ., 1995. 350 p. (in Russian).

8. Vittikh V. A., Ignatyev M. V., Smirnov S. V. Systems of support of communicative actions. Management and modeling problems in difficult systems. Works of XIII international conference. Samara, SRAS Publ., 2011, pp. 369–371 (in Russian).

9. Hirshleifer J. The Expanding Domain of Economics. American Economic Review: 1985, December, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 53-68.

10. Roshchina G. S. Conceptual approach to development of strategy of the territory development: universality and identity connection. Tomsk State University Bulletin, 2010, no. 332 (March), pp. 144–148 (in Russian).

11. Roshchina G. S. Management capabilities of the target model of man to achieve sustainable socio-economic development of the economy. Tomsk State University Bulletin, 2012, no. 364 (November), pp. 134–139 (in Russian).

12. Hodgson J. Economic theory and institutes. The manifesto of modern institutional economic theory. Translation from English. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2003.

13. Radayev V. V. Once again about a subject of economic sociology. Economic sociology, 2002, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 21–34 (in Russian).

14. Roshchina G. S. Conceptual approach to development of model of national idea: universality and identity connection. Collection of materials of the All-Russian open youth contest. Moscow, 2010, pp. 53 (in Russian).

15. Pokrovskaya N. N. Rationality of economic behavior. News of the Russian state pedagogical university of A. I. Gertzen: Public sciences and humanities, 2007, no. 9, pp. 128–137 (in Russian).

16. Arrow K. Rationality of self and others in an economic system. Journal of Business, 1986, no. 4 (October), pp. 382–399.

17. Frolova E. A. The spontaneous self-organization of individuals is a key factor in the formation of social responsibility of economic actors in Russia. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, vol. 12 (140), pp. 26–30 (in Russian).

18. Makarov V. L., Rubinov A. M., Levin M. I. Mathematical economic theory: Pure and Mixed Types of Economic Mechanisms. Advanced Textbooks in Economics, vol. 33. Elsevier, North-Holland, 1995. 610 p. (in Russian).

19. Genkin B. M. Bases of the economic theory and methods of organization of effective work. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009. 448 p. (in Russian).

vorobyova_g._s._152_157_5_146_2014.pdf ( 826.65 kB ) vorobyova_g._s._152_157_5_146_2014.zip ( 816.81 kB )

Issue: 5, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: ECONOMICS

Pages: 152 — 157

Downloads: 1232

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU