Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 11.01.2026
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №5 ALTERNATIVE ENDINGS OF DICKENS’S NOVEL “GREAT EXPECTATIONS” IN ENGLISH AND AMERICAN CRITICISM
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ALTERNATIVE ENDINGS OF DICKENS’S NOVEL “GREAT EXPECTATIONS” IN ENGLISH AND AMERICAN CRITICISM

Gredina I.V.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the main trends in the studies of the English and American Dickensian scholars concerning the problem of alternative endings in the novel “Great Expectations”. There are two variants of endings “truthful end” found in Dickens’s archieves and “happy” one which Dickens considered as symbolic. English and American Dickensian scholars have different opinions on two endings: some scholars believe “truthful end” is the only possible one, and is in accordance with the theme of expectations crash, another scientists consider that the “truthful” end does not solve the plot development. There is the idea of both endings identity. Despite this controversial concepts both endings are in accordance with each other because “happy end” is the romantic paraphrase of the “truthful” one. The translation of the “truthful end” and it’s comparison with the “happy end” contributes to reconstructing of Dickens’s artistic intentions.

Keywords: the later Dickens’ novels, the English criticism, “happy ending”, translation of the “truthful end”, reconstructions of Dickens’s artistic intentions, the lack of triumphant happy endings, disillusionment, semantic equivalence of alternative endings, roma

References:

1. Chesterton G. K. Appreciations and Criticism of the Works of Charles Dickens. New York: Dutton Publ., 1911. 571 p.

2. Ackroyd P. Dickens. New York: Harper Collins Publ., 1992. 1150 p.

3. Dickens Ch. Great Expectations (With an Introduction by John Irwing). New York; Toronto; London; Sydney; Auckland: Bantam Books Publ., 1988, 451 p.

4. Smith G. Dickens. Money and Society. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press Publ. 1968. P. 173–189.

5. Daleski H. M. Dickens and the Art of Analogy. London: Faber and Faber Publ., 1970. 371p.

6. The Complete Collection of the Works of Dickens (the translation by M. F. Lorie). 30 vols. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya Literatura Publ., 1960, vol. 23, p. 514 (in Russian).

7. Dabney Ross H. Love and Property in the Novels of Dickens. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967. 365 p.

8. Cochshut A. D. Great Expectations. The Imaginations of Charles Dickens. London, 1961. 254 p.

9. Jonson E. Charles Dickens. His Tragedy and Triumph. New York, Simon and Shuster Publ., 1952. 350 p.

10. Milhauser M. Great Expectations. The Three Endings. Dickens Study Annual. Southern Illinois University Press. London and Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 275–282.

11. Wilson A. The World of Charles Dickens. London, 1973. 379 p.

12. “The Honest end” of “Great Expectations” by Ch. Dickens. International Literature, 1937, no. 10, p. 242 (in Russian).

13. Gredina I. V. The Reception of Later Dickens’s Novels in Russia. 1860–1890. Tomsk, TPU Publ., 2001. 420 p. (in Russian).

gredina_i._v._198_203_5_146_2014.pdf ( 783.56 kB ) gredina_i._v._198_203_5_146_2014.zip ( 774.75 kB )

Issue: 5, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN EDUCATION

Pages: 198 — 203

Downloads: 1970

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU