Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 05.01.2026
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №11 THE DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS OF ESTIMATION OF TRAINING RESULTS IN THE SYSTEM OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS OF ESTIMATION OF TRAINING RESULTS IN THE SYSTEM OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION

Kamaleyeva A.R., Gruzkova S.J., Russkova O.B.

Information About Author:

The problem of improvement of forms of diagnostics and control of knowledge, abilities, skills, practical experience of the students of specialised secondary educational institutions under the introduction of federal state educational standards in educational practice is considered. The propaedeutic flow chart developed by authors allows to carry out stage-by-stage tracking of the concrete achievements which are trained and to determine the level of formation of common cultural and professional competences of students on all the way of development of the maintenance of a subject. Schematically this technology represents a set of four stages of didactic process from initial perception of theoretical knowledge and before their practical application. Each stage is estimated on a mark scale. The maximum number of points which the student can get on the sum of all stages makes hundred. The peculiarity of the offered development work is that it contains the level and criteria monitoring system: in a projection to the component structure of professional competences revealed by authors (cognitive, activity, motivational and valuable, communicative) to each level (from the 1st to the 3rd) achievements of results of training there corresponds the developed parameter of estimation of structure and quality of the carried-out operations, their sensibleness, completeness and curtness. Thus, the process of step formation of professional competences of students from simple to the difficult – assumes improvement of quality of educational experience.

Keywords: professional education, technological card, results of training, diagnostic tools

References:

1. Gruzkova S. Yu. General technical training of students at a vocational school in the context of reproductive and productive learning components. Kazan Pedagogical Magazine, 2008, no. 6, pp. 15–21 (in Russian).

2. Gruzkova S. Yu. Organizational-activity game to assess a range of measures reforming vocational education RT, development of proposals and amendments. Kazan Pedagogical Magazine, 2008, no. 4, pp. 119–124 (in Russian).

3. Kamaleeva A. R. The concept of formation of self-educational abilities, skills and the basic natural science competencies of students in the course of continuous natural-science education. TSPU Bulletin, 2012, no. 2, pp. 139–146 (in Russian).

4. Stepanova E. D. Development and productivity as the basic valuable reference of Russian education. TSPU Bulletin, 2013, no.11, pp 109–112 (in Russian).

5. Kamaleeva A. R., Hrapal L. R, Mukhutdinova T. Z., Maryashina I. V. Point-rating system of assessment of learning results in teaching physics course. Herald of Kazan Technological University, 2012, part 1, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 340–343 (in Russian).

6. Kamaleeva A. R. About the necessity of formation of the basic competencies of graduates of high schools under the conditions of creating a common European space of higher education. TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 1, pp. 103–108 (in Russian).

7. Krys'ko V. G. Psychology and Pedagogy. Schemes and comments. Moscow, 2001, 368 p. (in Russian).

8. Anisimov P. F. Secondary vocational education on the way to the third millennium. Development program of vocational education. Innovations in education of Russian Federation. Secondary vocational education. Moscow, MGUP Publ., 2000, p. 28 (in Russian).

9. Baydenko V. I., Selezneva N. A. Advancing standard of education as a theoretical and practical problem. Problems of quality of education: Proceedings of X All-Russian scientifi c conference. Part II. Moscow-Ufa, 2000 (in Russian).

10. Professional education: Encyclopedic Reference Dictionary in 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Scientifi c ed. Of G. V. Mukhametzyanova. Kazan, IPPPO Publ., 2013. 432 p. (in Russian).

11. Borisova L. P. Diagnosis of the quality of education of students of vocational schools: Author. dis. ... candidate. ped. sci. Stavropol, 2009. Pp. 74–75 (in Russian).

12. Kamaleeva A. R. Scientifi c and methodical system of formation of the basic natureal-science competences of students. Abstract of thesis doct. ped. sci. Moscow, 2012, 49 (in Russian).

kamaleyeva_a._r._134_139_11_152_2014.pdf ( 420.56 kB ) kamaleyeva_a._r._134_139_11_152_2014.zip ( 413.99 kB )

Issue: 11, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: PEDAGOGY AND DIAGNOSTICS

Pages: 134 — 139

Downloads: 1483

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU