Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.05.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №5 A BIOETHICAL ELEMENT OF THE VISUALIZATION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

A BIOETHICAL ELEMENT OF THE VISUALIZATION

Pervushina Nina Andreyevna

Information About Author:

The developing biotechnologies give rise to the new phenomena of art and science – from Sci-Art to bioaesthetics. The scientific research part of this governed by bioethics. The perception of these works of art raises the question of predictability of the consequences of this act. For this purpose, it seems appropriate to conduct diagnostic semiotic limits of applicability of theories of perception based on the model of information-synergetic approach. The main theses and models of information- synergetic approach are chosen as bases for the classification of psychological theories of visual information perception. The article states some results of the RFBR project no. 14–06–00440; of RFH project no. 15–03–00598-а.

Keywords: visual information, perception of visual information, bioethics, synergetic, information-synergetic approach

References:

1. Kozhevnikova M. Gibridy i khimery cheloveka i zhivotnogo: eksperimenty i etika [Hybrids and chimaeras of humans and animals: experiments and ethics]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie – Ethnographic review, 2013, no. 6, pp. 109–117 (in Russian).

2. Kozhevnikova M. Klonirovanie lyudey i problema statusa klona [The Cloning of humans and the problem with the clone status]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie – Ethnographic review, 2013, no. 3, pp. 95–101 (in Russian).

3. Gorbuleva M. S. Paradoksy otnosheniy bioetiki i biomeditsiny: tekhnologiya sozdaniya «animaglov» [Paradoxes of relations of bioethics and biomedicine: technology of “animags” creation]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 7 (148), pp. 9–15 (in Russian).

4. Grzinic-Mauhler M. Stelarc: Political Prosthesis & Knowledge of the Body. Maska & MKC (Ljubljana & Maribor), 2002. 206 p., http://stelarc. org/?catID=20242

5. Bulatov D. Kh. Tekhnobiologicheskoe proizvedenie iskusstva [Techno-biological artwork. Construction of a Human]. Konstruirovanie cheloveka [Construction of human]. Vol. 1, part 1. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2008. Pp. 15–21 (in Russian).

6. Bryzgalina E. V. Kontseptsii sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [Concepts of modern science]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2014. 496 p. (in Russian).

7. Beauty and the Brain. Biological Aspects of Aesthetics. Edited by Rentschler I., Herzberger B., Epstein D. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1988. 329 p. (Russ. ed.: Krasota i mozg. Biologicheskie aspekty estetiki / Pod red.: I. Renchlera, B. Khertsberger, D. Epstayna: per. s.eng. Moscow: Mir Publ., 1995. 335 p.).

8. Meshcheryakova T. V. Bioetika kak forma zashchity individual'nosti v sovremennoy kul'ture: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Bioethics as a form of individuality protection in modern culture. Abstract of thesis cand. of filos. sci.]. Tomsk, 2009. 23 p. (in Russian).

9. Meshcheryakova T. V. Bioetika na peresechenii naychnogo I vnenaycnogo znaniya [Bioethics at intersection of scientific and extra-scientific areas]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 10 (112), pp. 216–221 (in Russian).

10. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Metafory bioetiki kak predchuvstviya gumanitarnoy revolyutsii [Metaphors of bioethics as premonition of humanities revolution]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Herald of Tomsk state university. Phylosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2014, no. 4 (28), pp. 178–186 (in Russian).

11. Tishchenko P. D., Yudin B. G. Bioetika i zhurnalistika [Bioethics and journalism]. Moscow, Adamant Publ., 2011. 128 p. (in Russian).

12. Langer S. K. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art. The new american library, 1954. 256 p. (Russ. ed.: Langer S. K. Filosofiya v novom klyuche: per. s eng. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2000. 287 p.).

13. Zhukova E. A., Meshcheryakova T. V. Filosofsko-metodologicheskie aspekty bioeticheskoy problematiki avtonomii individa [Philosophical and methodological aspects of bioethical agenda of patients autonomy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, no. 2 (117), pp. 206–210 (in Russian).

14. Gorbulyeva M. S. Primenimost' printsipov bioetiki v vysshem obrazovanii [Informed consent, or bioethics principles in education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2013, no. 2, pp. 116–121 (in Russian).

15. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Vozdeystvie menyayushchegosya mira kak informatsionnyy protsess [Impact of a changing world as an information process]. Chelovek – Human, 2007, no. 3, pp. 32–43 (in Russian).

16. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Intellektual'nyy salon, ideya protsessa i problema izmereniya [Intelligent interior, the idea of the process and the measurement problem]. Epistemologiya i filisofiya nauki – Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2009, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 127–141 (in Russian).

17. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Izmerenie mechty po pravilu L'yuisa Kerrolla [Measurement of a Dream to Lewis Caroll’s Rule]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 10 (112), pp. 202–208 (in Russian).

18. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V., Melik-Gaykazyan M. V. Attraktivnyy menedzhment: metodologicheskie problemy teorii upravleniya i filosofskoe obosnovanie ponyatiya [Attractive management: methodological problems of management theories and concepts of philosophical justification]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2007, no. 11 (74), pp. 36–40 (in Russian).

19. Stepin V. S. Smena tipov nauchnoy ratsional'nosti [A change of types of scientific rationality]. Sinergetika i psikhologiya. Teksty [Synergetics and Psychology. Texts]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 1997. Pp. 108–122 (in Russian).

20. Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical knowledge]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 744 p. (in Russian).

21. Knyazeva E. N., Kurdyumov S. P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki. Rezhimy s obostreniem, samoorganizatsiya, tempomiry [Foundatioms of synergetic: blow-up regimes, self-organization, tempoworlds]. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2002. 414 p. (in Russian).

22. Vygotskiy L. S. Istoricheskiy smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. T. 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii [The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A Methodological Investigation. The Collected Works of Vygotsky. Vol. 1.]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1982. 488 p. (in Russian).

23. Mif, mechta, real'nost': postneklassicheskie izmereniya prostranstva kul'tury [Myth, dream, reality: postnonclassical measurement of culture space]. Pod red. I. V. Melik-Gaykazyan. Moscow, Nauchnyy mir Publ., 2005. 256 p. (in Russian).

24. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Memory-turn: arkhitektura bioetiki kak diagnostika novogo povorota filosofii [Memory-turn: architecture of bioethics as diagnostics of a new turn of philosophy]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2012, no. 4, pp. 165–179 (in Russian).

25. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Diagnostika memory-turn ili bioeticheskoe izmerenie problem professional'nogo obrazovaniya [Diagnosis of memory-turn or bioethics measurement problems of vocational education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, no. 4 (119), pp. 244–247 (in Russian).

26. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Memory-turn: proyavlennaya bioetikoy brennost' intellektual'nykh traditsiy [Memory turn: manifested by bioethics the frailty of intellectual traditions]. Idei i Idealy – Ideas and Ideals, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1 (15), pp. 49–63 (in Russian).

27. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Semioticheskaya diagnostika: sposob izmereniya egoizma vlasti [Semiotic diagnostics: Method of measuring the Selfishness of Power]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, no. 9 (137), pp. 255–261 (in Russian).

pervushina_n._a._118_122_5_158_2015.pdf ( 383.23 kB ) pervushina_n._a._118_122_5_158_2015.zip ( 376.48 kB )

Issue: 5, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: SCIENCE AND EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Pages: 118 — 122

Downloads: 1093

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU