Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №5 THE HISTORICAL WAY OF THE CIVIL RELIGION: FROM ENLIGHTENMENT TO HEGEMONY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE HISTORICAL WAY OF THE CIVIL RELIGION: FROM ENLIGHTENMENT TO HEGEMONY

Ryzhkov D.L., Kim V.V.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the historical foundations of the civil religion phenomenon migration from the European political space to the New World, its rooting there as an ideology of nation choosiness as well as the further development of the ideas of historical superiority over other peoples. The authors use as a source of USA documents the period of revolution: USA Declaration of Independence (1776), the work of "founding fathers" of the United States; treatises of J.-J. Rousseau, the speech of M. Robespierre, the Declaration of Independence of man and citizen (France, 1789). In the study of the evolution of civil religion used comparative historical analysis, aimed at comparing the ideological content of the objective political and economic conditions of people's lives. The authors conclude that the USA civil religion becomes ideology of hegemonization and unique guide to action in the policy.

Keywords: civil religion, human rights, globalization, ideology of superiority, hegemony

References:

1. Russo Zh. Zh. Ob obshchyestvennom dogovore [The Social Contract. Treatises]. Moscow, “Canon-press”, “Kuchkovo pole” Publ., 1998. 416 p. (in Russian).

2. Robesp'er M. Revolyutsyonnaya zakonnost’ i pravosudie [Revolutionary legality and justice. Articles and speeches]. Moscow, Gos. Izd-vo yuridicheskoy literatury Publ., 1959. 275 p. (in Russian).

3. Kokoshkin F. F. Teksty vazhneyshikh osnovnykh zakonov inostrannykh gosudarstv [Texts of important basic laws of foreign countries]. P. 1. Moscow, M. i S. Sabashnikovy Publ., 1905. 110 p. (in Russian).

4. Sources of the American Mind. A collection of documents and texts in American intellectual history. Ed. by L. Buritz. N.Y.: Wiley, 1966. Vol. 1. 385 р.

5. Matveeva O. Yu. “Amerikanskaya mechta” v sotsiokul’turnoy dinamike [“The American Dream” in the socio-cultural dynamics]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2007, no. 11 (74), pp. 40–44 (in Russian).

6. Kameneva V. A. Vsaimosvyaz’ sotsial’nogo poryadka i yazyka. Natsional’naya prinadlezhnost’ kak odna iz misheney ideologicheskikh tekhnologiy [Relationship of social order and language. Countries as one of the targets of ideological technologies]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2006, no. 4 (55), pp. 118–124 (in Russian).

7. Anosov P. V. Problemy amerikanskogo mentaliteta v sotsial’no-filosofskikh kontseptsiyakh T. Dzheffersona i B. Franklina [The Problems of American Mentality Noted in Social – Philosophic Conceptions of T. Jefferson and B. Franklin]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2006, no. 7 (58), pp. 74–78 (in Russian).

8. Zadorozhnyuk I. Ye. Grazhdanskaya religiya v SSHA: krakh liberal’nykh chayaniy i triumfy konservatorov [Civil religion in the United States: the collapse of the liberal aspirations and triumphs conservatives]. Problemy filosofii – Problems of Philosophy, 1984, no. 1, pp. 129–135 (in Russian).

9. Dzhefferson T. Zametki o religiyakh [Notes on Religion]. Amerikanskie prosvetiteli. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v dvukh tomakh [American Enlightenment. Selected works in two volumes]. Vol. 2. Moscow, “Mysl'” Publ., 1969. Pp. 34–46 (in Russian).

10. Zadorozhnyuk I. Ye. “Grazhdanskaya religya” v SSHA, ili “vera v Ameriku”: sotsial’nye funktsii, istoriya i sovremennost’ [“Civil religion” in the USA, or “faith in America”: social functions, history and modernity]. Moscow, SGA Publ., 2007. 354 p. (in Russian).

11. Doktrina Trumena [The Truman Doctrine]. Sayt “Kholodnaya voyna” [Website “Cold War”]. URL: http://www.coldwar.ru/truman/doctrine.php (accessed 25 October 2014) (in Russian).

12. Gadzhiev K. S. SSHA: evolyutsiya burzhuaznogo soznaniya [United States: evolution of bourgeois consciousness]. Moscow, 1981. 255 p. (in Russian).

13. Campbell D. E. Why we vote: how schools and communities shape our civic life. Princeton, 2006. 288 р.

14. V’etnamskaya voyna [The Vietnam War]. [Website “Vietnam News”]. URL: http://www.vietnamnews.ru/libwar.html (accessed 06 October 2014) (in Russian).

15. Biryukov A. M. Amerikanskie i sovetskie interesy v neftyanykh voynakh XX veka [American and Soviet interests in the oil wars of the twentieth century]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie I yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya I iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii I praktiki – Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov, 2011. No. 8, part 2, pp. 33–39 (in Russian).

16. Ryzhkov D. L. Sredniy klass v sisteme naemnogo truda globaliziruyushchegosya obshchestva (sotsial’no-filosofskiy aspect) [Middle class in the system of wage labor globalizing society (socio-philosophical aspect)]. Filosofiya sotsial’nykh kommunikatsiy – Philosophy of Social Communications, 2011, no. 4, pp. 145–154 (in Russian).

17. Dzhefferson T. Deklaratsiya predstaviteley Soedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki, sobravshikhsya na obshchiy congress [Declaration of Representatives of the United States gathered at the General Congress]. Amerikanskie prosvetiteli. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v dvukh tomakh [American Enlightenment. Selected works in two volumes]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1969. Pp. 27–33. (in Russian).

ryzhkov_d._l._171_176_5_158_2015.pdf ( 389.26 kB ) ryzhkov_d._l._171_176_5_158_2015.zip ( 382.12 kB )

Issue: 5, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL AND CULTURAL DYNAMICS

Pages: 171 — 176

Downloads: 1316

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU