Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 25.12.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №3 FEATURES OF FORMATION OF LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE OF TREINEES WITH DISABILITIES
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

FEATURES OF FORMATION OF LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE OF TREINEES WITH DISABILITIES

Chigintseva V.V.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the peculiarities of formation of linguistic competence (degree of native language) of students with disabilities. Children with disabilities have special educational opportunities and needs identified by psycho-pedagogical characteristics of this group of students. The characteristics of inclusive teaching space, including the risks potentially associated with formation of linguistic competence of students with disabilities. The process of formation of the linguistic competence of students of all categories, including the disabilities is based on the formation of their complex knowledge of the language as a system consisting of certain levels and corresponding to these unit-level representation of how language system develops and functions, what are the factors conditional on the national specifics of the language. Specificity of finding children with disabilities linguistic competence and its further improvement is determined by a complex of factors. First, of course, are affected by some of the internal contradictions inherent in the phenomenon of inclusion having a medico-social ontological essence. Secondly, the situation with the education of children with disabilities may present certain psychological risks. Thirdly, the inclusive approach in education can be restricted by inadequate resourcing: personnel, logistics, software methodical and finally financial. The urgency of the issues raised in the study is caused by a sharp decline in cognitive and motivational interest of students in general to the problems of language culture, as well as the problems associated with the organization and implementation of the educational process in an integrated (inclusive) basis. In the function of linguodidactic material is presented modified fragment of the adapted program of the Russian language for disabled students of the 6th grade (see “Noun”).

Keywords: competence, linguistic competence, students with disabilities, inclusive education

References:

1. Chigintseva V. V. Realizatsiya interactivnykh form obucheniya v practike shkol’nogo prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka [The realization of interactive forms of education in the practice of school Russian language teaching]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozreniye − Pedagogical Review, 2015, vol. 3(9), pp. 69–77 (in Russian).

2. Akivova M. K., Kozlova V. T. Individual’nost’ uchashchikhsya i individual’nyy podkhod [The individuality of students and individual approach]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 2012. 268 p. (in Russian).

3. Federai’nyy zakon ot 29.12.2012 No. 273-ФЗ “Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Federal Law of 29.12.2012 number 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation”]. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2012/12/30/obrazovanie-dok.html (accessed 16 November 2015) (in Russian).

4. Inklyuzivnoye obrazovaniye v Rossii. Detskiy fond OON (EUN ISEF) [Inclusive education in Russia. UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF)]. Moscow, BEST-print Publ., 2011. 88 p. (in Russian).

5. Turkovskiy V. I., Sharapova I. A., Bumazhenko N. I. Spetsifi ka organizatsii raboty resursnogo tsentra inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya Vitebskogo regiona [Specifi city of the organization of a resource center for inclusive education of the Vitebsk region]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Setevoye vzaimodeystviye universitetov s sotsial’nymi partnerami v oblasti inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya: mezhdunarodnyy i regional’nyy aspect” (Velikiy Novgorod, 19–21 maya 2014 goda) [Collection of scientifi c works on the Materials of International scientifi c and practical conference “Networking of universities with the social partners in the fi eld of inclusive education: International and regional dimension” (Velikiy Novgorod, May 19–21, 2014)]. Nizhny Novgorod, NovGY im. Yaroslava Mudrogo Publ., 2014. Pp. 323–328 (in Russian).

6. Gorodskoy portal professional’noy orientatsii uchashchikhsya goroda Moskvy [Municipal portal of professional orientation of Moscow students (Electronic resource)]. URL: http://center1.testov.net/children/ (accessed 31 October 2015) (in Russian).

7. Solodyankina O. V. Vospitaniye rebenka s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami zdorov’ya v sem’ye [Parenting a child with disabilities in the family]. Moscow, ARKTI Publ., 2007. 80 p. (in Russian).

8. Asmolov G. V. (ed.), Burmenskaya I. A. et al. Formirovaniye universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy v osnovnoy shkole: ot deystviya k mysli. Sistema zadaniy: posobiye dlya uchitelya. 2-е izd. [The formation of universal educational actions in primary school: from action to thought. Task System: Teacher’s Guide]. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 2011. 159 p. (in Russian).

9. Chigintseva V. V. Sovershenstvovaniye kompetentnostnoy bazy shkol’nikov na urokakh-interaktivakh pri osmyslenii trudnykh voprosov leksikologii [Improving competency base of schoolchildren at the interactive lessons, when thinking about diffi cult questions of lexicology]. Filologicheskaya nauka i shkola: dialog i sotrudnichestvo: sb. tr. po materialam VII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2 ch. [Philological science and school: dialogue and cooperation: Collection of works on the materials of VII All-Russian scientifi c-practical conference: in 2 parts]. Ed. L. V. Dudova. Ch. 2: Metodika prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka i literatury v shkole i vuze. Sovremennye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii v prepodavanii russkogo yazyka i literatury. Russkiy yazyk i literatura v polikul’turnom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve [Part 2: Methods of teaching the Russian language and literature in schools and universities. Modern educational technology in teaching of the Russian language and literature. The Russian language and literature in a multicultural educational space]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2015. Рp. 233–237 (in Russian).

10. Kur’yanovich A. V. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye, lingvodidakticheskiye i metodicheskiye aspekty sovershenstvovaniya yazykovoy kompetentsii v shkole i vuze [Psychologo-pedagogical, linguodidactical and methodical aspects of linguistic competence enhancement in schools and universities]. Nauchno-pedagogichescoe obozreniye − Pedagogical Review, 2015, vol. 1 (7), pp. 90–101 (in Russian).

11. Ogluzdina T. P. Razvitiye soderzhaniya ponyatiya «yazykovaya kompetentsiya» v istorii lingvistiki i teorii obucheniya inostrannym yazykam [Development of the concept of notion “linguistic competence” in the history of linguistics and teaching methods of foreign languages]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 2 (104), pp. 91–94 (in Russian).

12. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart [Federal State Educational Standard]. URL: http://standart.edu.ru/catalog.aspx?CatalogId=2626 (accessed 06 November 2014).

13. Blog “Vmeste” [Blog “Together”].URL: http://valeocentre.blogspot.ru/p/blog-page.html (accessed 16 November 2015).

14. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii k uchebnomu kompleksu po russkomu yazyku: 6 klass [Guidelines to the educational complex on Russian language: Grade 6]. Ed. S. N. Pimeneva. Moscow, Drofa Publ., 2009. 160 p. (in Russian).

chigintseva_v._v._96_101_3_168_2016.pdf ( 437.47 kB ) chigintseva_v._v._96_101_3_168_2016.zip ( 431.05 kB )

Issue: 3, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: MODERN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

Pages: 96 — 101

Downloads: 1371

For citation:


2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU