Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.01.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №6 THE VERBALIZATION MEANS OF EVALUATION IN “STAR” INTERVIEW
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE VERBALIZATION MEANS OF EVALUATION IN “STAR” INTERVIEW

Dubskikh A.I., Butova A.V., Sevastyanova V.S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-6-61-65

Information About Author:

Dubskikh A. I., Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (pr. Lenina, 38, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation, 455000). E-mail: lina_masu@mail.ru Butova A. V., Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (pr. Lenina, 38, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation, 455000). E-mail: annb.79@mail.ru Sevastyanova V. S., Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture (Dvortsovaya naberezhnaya, 2, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191186). E-mail: valesel@mail.ru

The article examines the role of explication of the evaluating attitude in the „star” interview. The evaluation category is an integral part of the linguistic view of the world. A man’s relation to the world and other people is the relation of active interaction with the world around and purposeful transformation of the world according to his values. The intentional features of “star” interview aimed at maximum disclosure of the interlocutor’s personality, as well as at the identification of his value conceptions are described in the work. The evaluation of the agent’s life experience and his social status form the basis for choosing value orientations – ideological, aesthetic, moral grounds for evaluating the world around. Therefore, it could be argued that the evaluation expresses the objective and subjective relation of the agent of speech to the designated one. The characteristic of structure and components of evaluation is given. The emotionalevaluative state of the agent requires special linguistic forms of his objectification. Examples of language verbalization of the evaluation in the “star” interview are given. The choice of the means depends on speaker’s interpretation of this or that fact and his evaluation of this or that object’s act. The research has shown that the modern language has a variety of phonetic, lexical, grammatical, phraseological means for adequate expression of the emotionally-valued relations to the agent of the utterance. As a rule, there is a close interaction of linguistic means of various levels.

Keywords: “star” interview, evaluation, structure of evaluation, components of evaluation, the emotionalevaluative replies, language verbalization of the evaluation

References:

1. Dubskikh А. I. Strategiya samoprezentatsii publichnoy persony v zvezdnom interv’yu [The strategy of self-presentation of public person in “star” interview]. Slovo, vyskazyvaniye, tekst v kognitivnom, pragmaticheskom i kul’turologicheskom aspektakh: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Word, utterance, text in cognitive, pragmatic and cultural aspects: materials of the VI International scientifi c conference]. Chelyabinsk, Izd-vo Chelyab. gos. un-ta, 2012. Pp. 216–219 (in Russian).

2. Shvets E. V. “Zvezdnoye” interv’yu v kommunikativno-pragmaticheskom aspekte. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [“Star” interview in communicativePragmatic aspect. Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Kaliningrad, 2008. 24 p. (in Russian).

3. Dubskikh А. I. Vyrazheniye otsenki v lichnostnom interv’yu [The expression of emotional attitude in a personal interview]. Problemy istorii, fi lologii i kul’tury – Issues of history, philology and culture. Magnitogorsk, MaGU Publ., 2006, vol. XVIII, pp. 82–87 (in Russian).

4. Dubskikh А. I., Sevastyanova V. S. “Zvezdnoye” interv’yu: strukturno-kompozitsionnyy aspect [“Star” interview: structural and compositional aspects]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2016, vol. 3 (168), pp. 24–28 (in Russian).

5. Vendina T. I. Semantika otsenki i eye manifestatsiya sredstvami slovoobrazovaniya [Semantics of evaluation and its manifestation by means of word formation]. Slavyanovedeniye – Slavic Studies, 1997, no. 4, pp. 41–48 (in Russian).

6. Vol’f E. M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional evaluation semantics]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006. 280 p. (in Russian).

7. Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt [Types of linguistics meanings: Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 339 p. (in Russian).

8. Ivin A. A. Osnovaniya logiki otsenok [Foundations of logic of evaluations]. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta Publ., 1970. 230 p. (in Russian).

9. Pogorelova S. D. Ponyatiye i struktura otsenki [Evaluation concept and structure]. Language and literature, 2003, vol. 16. pp. 34–42 (in Russian).

10. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-27007551.html (accessed 20.01.2017).

11. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/kino/regisseurin-samira-makhmalbaf-ist-da-jemand-unter-den-burkas-a-306789.html (accessed 28.12.2016).

12. Ivanina G. N. Vyrazheniye otsenki v protsesse kommunikatsii [Expression of evaluation in the process of communication]. Kommunikativnopragmaticheskiy aspekt predlozheniya v nemetskom yazyke [Communicative-pragmatic aspect in German]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. 320 p. (in Russian).

13. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/kino/pulitzer-preistraeger-michael-chabon-spidey-needs-you-a-308437.html (accessed: 15.01.2017).

14. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/kino/regisseurin-lone-scherfi g-ich-mag-dieses-ganze-lob-nicht-a-266094.html (accessed 20.01.2017).

15. Gak V. G. Emotsii i otsenki v strukture vyskazyvaniya i teksta [Emotions and evaluations in the structure of utterances and text]. Vestnik MGU, 1997, vol. 3, pp. 87–93 (in Russian).

16. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/kino/interview-mit-bully-herbig-mich-halten-viele-fuer-bekloppt-a-309533.html (accessed 05.12.2016).

17. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/kulturspiegel/d-31350016.html (accessed: 27.11.2016).

18. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/musik/bette-midler-im-interview-der-humor-ist-heute-so-viel-schmutziger-a-1007831.html (accessed 15.01.2017).

19. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/tv/eurovisionshoffnung-lena-ja-hallo-gute-nachricht-ich-schlafe-durch-a-697329.html (accessed 27.11.2016).

20. Zalavina T. Y., Kisel O. V. “Blame” Concept in Phraseology: cognitive-semantic aspect (based on the french language). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2016, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 9693–9703.

21. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/musik/interview-mit-al-jarreau-europa-haelt-den-jazz-am-leben-a-308719.html (accessed 27.11.2016).

22. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-131927890.html (accessed 05.12.2016).

23. Dubskikh A. I., Butova A. V., Kharitonova S. V. Solidarizatsiya kak taktika samoprezentatsii publichnoy persony v “zvezdnom” interv‘yu [Solidarity as the tactics of public person’s self-presentation in the “Star” interview]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Questions of Cognitive Linguistics, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 99–106 (in Russian).

24. Der Spiegel. URL: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-131927890.html (accessed 15.01.2017).

dubskikh_a._i._61_65_6_183_2017.pdf ( 436.79 kB ) dubskikh_a._i._61_65_6_183_2017.zip ( 430.85 kB )

Issue: 6, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: GERMANIC AND ROMANCE LANGUAGES

Pages: 61 — 65

Downloads: 1485

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU