Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 29.03.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №6 SPEECH GENRES SPECIFICITY OF AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN SPORTS COMMENTARIES
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

SPEECH GENRES SPECIFICITY OF AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN SPORTS COMMENTARIES

Pak L.E.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-6-117-122

Information About Author:

Pak L. E., Far Eastern Federal University (ul. Sukhanova, 8, Vladivostok, Russian Federation, 690950), E-mail: leonid.pak@vvsu.ru

The article gives the results of comparison of illocutionary speech acts in sports commentaries in the USA and Russia under linguocultural paradigm. Sports commentary has made the system of its genres complicated over years. Description of discursive personality in the framework of sports commentary requires knowledge of basic speech genres and speech acts. We can see the tendency of individualization in sports commentary because it incorporates certain emotionally-estimated units (lexical and grammatical). Thus the analysis of speech genres specificity in sport commentary is of particular interest to scholars. Speech genres structure the communicative space of native speakers. Sports commentators, as bearers of different languages and cultures prefer different speech genres. Study of this specificity is of the interest of both foreign and domestic linguists. This is the first comparative analysis of the system of speech genres of sports commentators, as bearers of different cultures. That determines the scientific novelty of this study. Sports commentaries in artistic gymnastics (Russian and English) are the material of this study. We paid particular attention to the analysis of system of illocutionary speech acts using discourse analysis. The article describes the results of the analysis of illocutionary speech acts in sports commentary that determines the nature of functioning of the language personality.

Keywords: speech genre, speech genres specificity, system of speech genres, illocutionary speech acts, sports commentary

References:

1. Nikolaeva O. V. Pragmaticheskiy potentsial atributivnykh kompozitov v amerikanskom massmediynom diskurse po predvybornoy tematike [Pragmatic potential of attribute composites in the American mass-media discourse of electoral campaign]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2016, vol. 9–3 (63), pp. 146–149 (in Russian).

2. Bakhtin M. M. Sobraniye sochineniy [Collected works]. Moscow, Russkiye slovari Publ., 1996. Pp. 159–206 (in Russian).

3. Wierzbicka A. Semantic primitives across languages: A critical review. In: Semantic and lexical universals. C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1994. Pp. 445–500.

4. Gayda St. Problemy zhanra [Problems of genre]. Funktsional’naya stilistika: teoriya stiley i ikh yazykovaya orientatsiya [Functional Stylistics: theory of styles and their linguistic orientation]. Perm Publ., 1986. Pp. 127–144 (in Russian).

5. Robins 1971. Tsit. po: Bogin G. I. Rechevoy zhanr kak sredstvo individuatsii [Speech genre as a mean of individualization]. Zhanry rechi [Speech genres]. Saratov Publ., 1997. p. 22 (in Russian).

6. Lebedeva N. B. Zhanry estestvennoy pis’mennoy rechi [Genres of natural written speech]. Antologiya rechevykh zhanrov: povsednevnaya kommunikatsiya [Anthology of speech genres: everyday communication]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 2007. Pp. 116–124 (in Russian).

7. Sedov K. F. Chelovek v zhanrovom prostranstve povsednevnoy kommunikatsii [The man in the genre space of everyday communication]. Antologiya rechevykh zhanrov: povsednevnaya kommunikatsiya [Corpus of speech genres: everyday communication]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 2007. 320 p. (in Russian).

8. Istrate Petru. Lingvostilisticheskiye i ritoricheskiye osobennosti sportivnogo reportazha kak zhanra SMI: na materiale futbol’nogo reportazha. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Linguostylistic and rhetorical features of sports reportage as a genre of Mass Media: on a material of football reportage. Abstract of thesis cand. of fi l. sci.]. Moscow, 2006. 22 p. (in Russian).

9. Batsevich F. S. Rechevoy zhanr i kommunikativnyy smysl [Speech genre and communicative sense]. Zhanry rechi [Speech genre]. Saratov, Kolledzh Publ., 2005. Pp. 112–123 (in Russian).

10. Shmeleva T. V. Model’ rechevogo zhanra [Model of speech genre]. Zhanry rechi [Speech genres]. Saratov, GosUNTs “Kolledzh” Publ., 1999. Pp. 88–98. (in Russian).

11. Vinokur T. G. Informativnaya i faticheskaya rech’ kak obnaruzheniye raznykh kommunikativnykh namereniy govoryashchego i slushayushchego [Informative and phatic speech as a detection of different communicative intentions of the speaker and the listener]. Russkiy yazyk v ego funktsionirovanii. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskiy aspect [Russian language in its functioning. Communicative-pragmatic aspect]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. pp. 5–20 (in Russian).

12. Malysheva E. G. Russkiy sportivnyy diskurs: lingvokognitivnoye issledovaniye [Russian sports discourse: linguocognitive study]. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 2011. 370 p. (in Russian).

13. NBC Sports. URL: http://www.nbcsports.com/tennis (accessed 05.08.2016).

14. Sportbox. URL: http://news.sportbox.ru/Vidy_sporta/gimnastika (accessed 25.10.2016).

pak_l._e._117_122_6_183_2017.pdf ( 433.36 kB ) pak_l._e._117_122_6_183_2017.zip ( 426.96 kB )

Issue: 6, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: COMPARATIVE STUDIES

Pages: 117 — 122

Downloads: 1854

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU