PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL FEATURES OF SEPARATE EDUCATION OF BOYS AND GIRLS AT SECONDARY SCHOOL
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-9-156-160
In the article the authors present psychological and pedagogical features of the separate education in single-gender classes. In particular the psychophysiological differences of schoolchildren are highlighted. Separate education is justified as the most optimal form of the educational process, which makes it possible to create more comfortable educational environment and to achieve the highest results of the schoolchildren’s education. The main psychophysiological, neuropsychological differences between boys and girls are identified, which must be taken into account when organizing the educational process in single-gender classes. Some researchers note that boys and girls develop differently: physiologically and psychologically girls develop two or three years earlier then boys, this is certainly connected with the hormonal development of children. Boys and girls study program material completely differently. Girls are characterized by perseverance and versatility in solving problems. As a rule, in primary school, boys usually learn worse. As for girls, their academic performance is much higher; they are often praised by teachers. Such laudatory comments can contribute to demotivation of boys in an effort to learn well. Therefore, because of these girls’ features, the success of boys look, to put it mildly, insignificant: boys have false feelings of inferiority and girls – superiority. Some results of the project “Separate education of girls and boys on the basis of a gender approach” are presented. The realization of the project takes place in Tomsk School No. 2.
Keywords: education, separate education of girls and boys, gender differentiation, psychological and physiological characteristics of schoolchildren
References:
1. Rykov S. L. Gendernye issledovaniya v pedagogike [Gender Studies in Pedagogy]. Pedagogika – Pedagogy, 2001, no. 7, pp. 17–22 (in Russian).
2. Slavutskaya E. V. Eksperimental’noye izucheniye gendernykh razlichiy v razvitii emotsional’no-volevykh i intellektual’nykh svoystv mladshikh podrostkov [Experimental researches of gender features development of younger teenagers emotionally-volitional and intellectual qualities]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2009, vol. 9 (87), pp. 127–129 (in Russian).
3. Karimulaeva E. M., Damadanova Kh. D. Problemy i perspektivy gendernogo obucheniya v sovremennoy sisteme obrazovaniya [Problems and prospects of gender training in the modern education system]. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P. F. Lesgafta, 2011, no. 6 (76), pp. 67–72 (in Russian).
4. Baurova Yu. V. Intensifi katsiya protsessa obucheniya v usloviyakh realizatsii gendernogo podkhoda [Intensifi cation of the learning process in conditions of gender mainstreaming]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im N. A. Nekrasova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsial’naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sotsiokinetika – Vestnik of Nekrasov Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Social work. Juvenology. Socio-kinetics, 2010, no. 3, pp. 19–23 (in Russian).
5. Lamzina Yu. A. Uchet gendernykh razlichiy v protsesse obucheniya v otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy pedagogike [Consideration of gender differences in the process of education in the Russian and foreign pedagogy]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Izvestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical Universtity, 2012, no. 10, pp. 84–87 (in Russian).
6. Khrizman T. P., Eremeeva V. D., Loskutova T. D. Emotsii, rech i aktivnost’ mozga rebenka [Emotions, speech and activity of the child’s brain]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1991, 232 p. (in Russian).
7. Eremeeva V. D., Khrizman T. P. Mal’chiki i devochki dva raznykh mira Neyropsikhologi – uchitelyam, vospitatelyam, roditelyam, shkol’nym psikhologam [Boys and girls are two different worlds. Neuropsychologists for teachers, educators, parents, school psychologists]. Moscow, LINKA-PRESS Publ., 2001, 184 p. (in Russian).
8. Esipenko E. A., Khodanovich M. Yu. Polovye razlichiya pri vypolnenii kognitivnykh zadaniy raznoy slozhnosti [Sex differences in the implementation of cognitive tasks of different complexity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2014, no. 379, pp. 214–221 (in Russian).
9. Bazarnyy V. F. Ditya chelovecheskoye Psikhofi ziologiya razvitiya i regressa [A child of man. Psychophysiology of development and regression]. Moscow, 2009, 330 p. (in Russian).
10. Kazakova A., Savostyanova E. Mal’chiki plyus/ minus devochki: est’ li budushcheye u razdel’nogo obucheniya [Boys plus / minus girls: is there a future for separate education] (in Russian). URL: http://www.7ya.ru/article/Malchiki-plyusminus-devochki-est-li-buduwee-u-razdelnogoobucheniya/ (accessed 15 April 2017).
11. Zotova L. M. Individualno-lichnostnyy podkhod kak prerogativa razdel’nogo obucheniya: istoriko-pedagogicheskiy aspekt [The individuallypersonal approach as the prerogative of separate training: historical-pedagogical aspect]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya – Problems of Modern Education, 2010, no. 5, pp. 44–47 (in Russian).
( 414.76 kB ) 
( 408.89 kB )
Issue: 9, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 9
Rubric: GENERAL EDUCATION
Pages: 156 — 160
Downloads: 1392