Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 12.02.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №9 “TO LIVE WITH THIS GOOD WIFE PARADISE IN ANY PLACE”: THE MARRIED LIFE OF RUSSIAN LAWYERS IN THE SECOND HALF OF XIX – EARLY XX CENTURIES
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

“TO LIVE WITH THIS GOOD WIFE PARADISE IN ANY PLACE”: THE MARRIED LIFE OF RUSSIAN LAWYERS IN THE SECOND HALF OF XIX – EARLY XX CENTURIES

Adonyeva I.G.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-9-52-58

Information About Author:

Adonyeva I. G., Novosibirsk State Technical University (pr. K. Marksa, 20, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630073). E-mail: adoinessa@yandex.ru

The article presents the analysis of peculiarities of creation of family and family life of the Russian law intellectual elite of the period of modernization in the second half of XIX – early XX centuries. The importance of this aspect is due to the significance of the family, especially wife, in creating the conditions for successful scientific and journalistic activities. Some aspects of the problem are reflected in the works of N. L. Pushkareva, L. P. Repina, T. A. Saburova. This issue is at the intersection of problematic fields of history of intellectual culture, and the history of everyday life. A full study of the results of intellectual activity is possible only taking into account the understanding of the working conditions of their creators, their surrounding environment and relationships with family. To understand these features we have applied the methods of biographical and generational analysis, and gender analysis from the standpoint of the historical andrology. Conclusions based on the study with the denoted positions of the diaries and memoirs of the lawyers. Professionally successful lawyers suffered the most comfortable transition to a small family, perceived equitable conjugal role and the active role of the father in the upbringing of children. Marriage was seen as a deliberate step, voluntary, based on love union. The financial position of the bride had a secondary role, importance is given to personal qualities and level of intelligence. They emphasized the undoubted value to family life. Extramarital relations (if mentioned) were described very veiled. Representations of law intellectual elite about family and marriage, as well as practical implementation has coincided with the trends in this direction among the Russian educated society in the second half of XIX – early XX centuries.

Keywords: memoirs, diaries, married life, law intellectual elite

References:

1. Adonyeva I. G. Yuridicheskaya intellektual’naya elita kak sub’’ekt pravovogo diskursa russkoy zhurnal’noy pressy vtoroy poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka [Law intellectual elite as the subject of legal discourse of Russian “fat” magazines in the second half of 19th – beginning 20th centuries]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2016, vol. 5 (216), pp. 107–111 (in Russian).

2. Mironov B. N. Sotsial’naya istoriya Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII – nachalo XX v.). V 2 t. T. 1 [Social history of Russia in period of empire (18 – beginning 20 centuries). In 2 vol. V. 1]. St. Petersburg, 1999. 548 p. (in Russian).

3. Veremenko V. A. Evolyutsiya dvoryanskoy sem’i v usloviyakh modernizatsii Rossii: vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX v. Avtoref. dis. dokt. ist. nauk [Evolution of a noble family in the context of modernization of Russia: second half of XIX – early XX centuries. Abstract of thesis of doct. hist. sci]. St. Petersburg, 2003. 50 p. (in Russian).

4. Saburova T. A., Ehklof B. Druzhba, sem’ya, revolyutsiya: Nikolay Charushin i pokoleniye narodnikov 1870-kh godov [Friendship, family, revolution: Nikolai Charushin and the generation of the populists of the 1870s]. Moscow, 2016. 448 p. (in Russian).

5. Repina L. P. Intellektual’naya kul’tura kak predmet issledovaniya [Intellectual culture as a subject of study]. Idei i lyudi: intellectual’naya kul’tura Evropy v Novoye vremya [Ideas and people: intellectual culture of Europe in modern times]. Ed. L. P. Repina. Moscow, 2014. 848 p. (in Russian).

6. Pushkareva N. L. Predmet i metody izucheniya istorii povsednevnosti [The subject and methods of studying history of everyday life]. Sotsial’naya istoriya – The Social History, 2007, pp. 9–21 (in Russian).

7. Chicherin B. N. Vospominaniya. V 2 t. [Memories. In two books]. Moscow, 2009. Book 1. 496 p. (in Russian).

8. Arsen’ev K. K. Avtobiografi ya (1861–1894) [Autobiography (1861–1894)]. Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv literatury i iskusstva [The Russian State Archive of Literature and Arts]. F. 40. О. 1. D. 14. L. 2 оb. (in Russian).

9. Yanzhul I. I. Vospominaniya o perezhitom i vidennom v 1864–1909 gg. [Memories about the experience and the seen in 1864–1909]. Moscow, 2006. 459 p. (in Russian).

10. Kovalevskiy M. M. Moya zhizn’. Vospominaniya [My life. Memories]. Moscow, 2005. 784 p. (in Russian).

11. Chicherin B. N. Vospominaniya. V 2 t. [Memories. In two books]. Moscow, 2009. Book 2. 258 p. (in Russian).

12. Mayorova O. “Pishu ya tol’ko dlya Vas”: pis’ma K. P. Pobedonostseva sestram Tyutchevym [“I write only for You”: Letters from C. P. Pobedonostsev to Tyutchev sisters]. Novyy mir – New World, 1994, no 3, pp.195–222 (in Russian).

13. Golitsyn M. V. Moi vospominaniya. 1873–1917 [My memories]. Moscow, 2007. 768 p. (in Russian).

14. Kamarovskaya E. L. Vospominaniya. Zapiski [Memories. Notes]. Moscow, 2003. 454 p. (in Russian).

15. Kamarovskiy L. A. Dnevnik [Diary]. RGALI [The Russian State Archive of Literature and Arts]. F. 1337. О. 1. D. 90. L. 22 оb. (in Russian).

16. Arsen’ev K. K. Dnevnik [Diary]. RGALI [The Russian State Archive of Literature and Arts]. F. 40. О. 1. D. 27. L. 224 (in Russian).

17. Kamarovskiy L. A. Dnevnik [Diary]. RGALI [The Russian State Archive of Literature and Arts]. F. 1337. О. 1. D. 88. L. 2 оb. (in Russian).

18. Kamarovskiy L. A. Dnevnik [Diary]. RGALI [The Russian State Archive of Literature and Arts]. F. 1337. О. 1. D. 89. L. 98 (in Russian).

19. Legkij D. M. Dmitriy Vasil’evich Stasov: sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. i formirovaniye prisyazhnoy advokatury v Rossiyskoy imperii [Dmitry Vasilievich Stasov: judicial reform of 1864 and the formation of advocacy in the Russian Empire]. St. Petersburg, 2011. 424 p. (in Russian).

adonyeva_i._g._52_58_9_186_2017.pdf ( 436.83 kB ) adonyeva_i._g._52_58_9_186_2017.zip ( 430.35 kB )

Issue: 9, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 9

Rubric: HISTORY OF RUSSIA

Pages: 52 — 58

Downloads: 1563

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU