THE FUNCTIONING OF THE PRONOUN FORM GLI IN THE 16TH-CENTURY ITALIAN LANGUAGE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-5-9-14
The article focuses on the polifunctional pronoun form gli and its patterns of use in the 16th-century Italian. In Old Italian, as a result of phonetic changes, this form became virtually universal, as it performed various subject, direct object and indirect object functions and co-occurred with other developments of the Lat. ille. In Modern Italian gli has several uses, but they are not stylistically equal: gli as the indirect object masculine singular pronoun is normative, gli as the indirect object plural form is colloquially marked, and gli as the indirect object feminine singular pronoun is regarded as a vulgarism. The 16th century, in a way, was a transition period when certain uses of gli that later became obsolete are only present in comic genres and in the writings by semiliterate authors. Another interesting feature is the growing discrepancy between the dialect of Florence and the codified norm. The reduction of superfluous uses of gli in the 16th-century Italian has not been dealt with specially before. The present piece of research aims at assessing the way the functions of gli were gradually being reduced and differentiated stylistically, which becomes evident when one confronts prose and verse writings belonging to different genres and to authors from different regions of Italy.
Keywords: Italian language, history of Italian, personal pronouns, grammatical synonymy, language norm
References:
1. D’Achille P. Sintassi del parlato e tradizione scritta della lingua italiana. Rome, Bonacci, 1990. 400 p.
2. Sabatini F. L’italiano dell’uso medio: una realtà tra le varietà linguistiche italiane. Gesprochenes italienisch in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Tübingen, Gunter Narr, 1985. P. 154–184.
3. Cortelazzo M. A. Evoluzione della lingua, percezione del cambiamento, staticità della norma. Lingua scuola e società. I nuovi bisogni comunicativi nelle classi multiculturali. E. Pistolesi (ed.). Trieste, Istituto Gramsci del Friuli Venezia Giulia, 2007. P. 47–55.
4. Pescarini D. The emergence of two classes of clitic clusters in (Italo) Romance. Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20–22 April 2012. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. Vol. 7. Pp. 171–183.
5. Salvi G. Difesa e illustrazione della legge di Wackernagel applicata alle lingue romanze antiche: la posizione delle forme pronominali clitiche. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, 1993. Vol. 24. Pp. 111–130.
6. Maiden M. Linguistic History of Italian. Bologna, Mulino, 1998. 307 c.
7. Rohlfs G. Historical Grammar of Italian and its Dialects. Vol. II. Turin, Einaudi, 1966–1970. 399 p.
8. Berruto G. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Rome, Carocci, 2014. 280 p.
9. Benincà P., Penello N. L’uso di le al di là dei suoi confi ni. Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti, 2009, vol. 21, pp. 13–28.
10. Egerland V. Sull’uso del pronome loro nell’opera di Pietro Fortini. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 1999, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 77–94.
11. Telve S. Essere o avere? Sull’alternanza degli ausiliari coi modali potuto, voluto (e dovuto) davanti a infi niti inaccusativi in italiano antico e moderno. Studi linguistici per Luca Serianni. V. Della Valle & P. Trifone (eds.). Roma, Salerno. 2007. Pp. 313–325.
12. Patota G. Per. Studi linguistici per Luca Serianni. V. Della Valle & P. Trifone (eds.). Roma, Salerno. 2007. Pp. 3–18.
13. Nencioni G. Di scritto e di parlato. Discorsi linguistici. Bologna, Zanichelli. 1983. 290 p.
( 449.99 kB ) 
( 443.86 kB )
Issue: 5, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: ROMANCE AND GERMANIC LANGUAGES
Pages: 9 — 14
Downloads: 848