Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 24.02.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №5 COMPOSITIONALITY OF ADJECTIVE-NOUN EXPRESSIONS WITH THE MODIFIER FAKE: COGNITIVE ASPECTS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COMPOSITIONALITY OF ADJECTIVE-NOUN EXPRESSIONS WITH THE MODIFIER FAKE: COGNITIVE ASPECTS

Semenova T.I.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-5-20-27

Information About Author:

Semenova T. I., Irkutsk State University (ul. Lenina, 8, Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664025). E-mail: tisemenova54@mail.ru

The paper discusses the compositional semantics of adjective-noun combinations like fake gun. Compositionality appears to be one of the most cognitively basic principles guiding semantic research. This study argues the claim of formal semantics that the meaning of an expression is a function of the meanings of its parts and of the way they are syntactically combined. The article adduces support for the claim that the meaning of the whole cannot be predicted from the meanings of the parts and the way they are put together. The investigation makes an attempt to find the relations between formally integrated linguistic structure and conceptually integrated structures. The adjective fake is seen as privative for which an instance of the adjective + noun combination is never an instance of the noun alone. Complexes with fake entail the negation of the noun modified by fake. The paper accounts for the meaning of adjective-noun combinations in terms of conceptual integration. Within the framework of mental spaces theory the adjective fake prompts for a specific complex mapping scheme and emerges a novel conceptual blend. In terms of conceptual blending the adjective fake calls for two input spaces with a disanalogy connector such that an element in one place is real, but in the other is not. The article highlights combinatorial possibilities of fake. Of particular concern is the issue that the appropriate use of fake requires the activation of an appropriate frame.

Keywords: compositionality, adjective meaning, lexical semantics, emergent structure, blend, mental spaces, cognitive domain, complex concept

References:

1. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of a person]. 2nd ed., Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).

2. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow, Essex: Longman Group Ltd., 1997. 1680 p.

3. Cambridge International Dictionary of Current English. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995. 1773 p.

4. Etymological Dictionary of the English Language in Walter. W. Sheat (ed.). Oxford, Clarenton Press, 1910. 536 p.

5. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1980. 242 p.

6. Partee B. H. Compositionality and coercion in semantics: The Dynamics of adjective meaning. Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2007. Pp. 145–161.

7. Lakoff G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press, 1990. 614 p.

8. Kubryakova Ye. S. Yazyk i znaniye. Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge. On the way of getting knowledge of a language: parts of speech from the cognitive point of view. The role of a language in the knowledge of the world], Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. 560 p. (Yazyk. Semiotika. Kul’tura) [(Language, Semiotics, Culture)] (in Russian).

9. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, 2002. 440 p.

10. Kubryakova Ye. S. O netrivial’noy semantike v sochetayemosti prilagatel’nykh s sushchestvitel’nymi [On non-trivial semantics in the compatibility of adjectives with nouns]. Sokrovennyye smysly: Slovo. Tekst. Kul’tura [Hidden Meaning: Word. Text. Culture]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. Pp. 148–153 (in Russian).

11. Taylor J. R. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995. 309 p.

12. News 24. URL: https://www.news24.com/World/News/man-accused-of-using-fake-british-passport-for-20-years-20170801 (accessed 24 January 2017).

13. Ivin A. A. Aksiologiya [Axiology]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2006. 390 p. (in Russian).

14. Koshelev A. D. K opisaniyu universal’nogo kontsepta ‘Obman – Obmanut’ [To the description of the universal concept “Deceit – Deceive”]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Mezhdu lozh’yu i fantaziyey. Sost. N. D. Arutyunova [Logical analysis of the language. Between lies and fantasy. Compiler N. D. Arutyunova]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2008. Pp. 118–133 (in Russian).

15. Apresyan Yu. D. Ot istiny do lzhi po prostranstvu yazyka [From truth to falsehood in the space of a language]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Mezhdu lozh’yu i fantaziyey. Sost. N. D. Arutyunova [Logical analysis of the language. Between lies and fantasy. Compiler N. D. Arutyunova]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2008. Pp. 23–45 (in Russian).

16. SFGATE. URL: http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/S-F-dealer-accused-of-selling-fake-Mir-prints-3289340.php (accessed 27 December 2017).

17. British National Corpus. URL: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk (accessed 27 December 2017).

18. Ekman P. Unmasking the Face. A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from the Facial Clues. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1975. 212 p.

19. Rendell R. Death Notes. New York, Bullantine Books, 1989. 218 p.

20. Collins’ Word of the Year. URL: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/woty (accessed 13 November 2017).

21. Shaw I. Nightwork. Saint Petersburg, Antologiya: KARO Publ., 2005. 448 p.

semenova_t._i._20_27_5_194_2018.pdf ( 452.38 kB ) semenova_t._i._20_27_5_194_2018.zip ( 445.63 kB )

Issue: 5, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: ROMANCE AND GERMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 20 — 27

Downloads: 1619

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU