Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.01.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №7 PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS AS PRAGMA-AXIOLOGICAL MODELLING ELEMENT OF THE ENGLISH BUSINESS DISCOURSE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS AS PRAGMA-AXIOLOGICAL MODELLING ELEMENT OF THE ENGLISH BUSINESS DISCOURSE

Bagiyan A.Y., Nersesyan G.R.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-7-33-37

Information About Author:

Bagiyan A. Yu., Pyatigorsk State University (pr. Kalinina, 9, Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation, 357532). E-mail: alexander.0506@mail.ru Nersesyan G. R., Pyatigorsk State University (pr. Kalinina, 9, Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation, 357532). E-mail: nersesyangayane.pgu@gmail.com

The relevance of the current research is defined by the increasing role of business communication and fixation of the sphere of business and finance as the predominating links in the development of modern society. In view of the initial orientation on increase in its target audience and formation of the relation necessary for business to his activity, business discourse in modern information space shows the most democratic verbal character, undergoing processes of deconventionalisation and deregimentation and getting closer to colloquial functional style on a number of characteristics. The aim of the conducted research is the development of the authors’ own classification of notions of evaluation expressions presented by phraseological units on the basis of their correlation with evaluation expressions (according to N. D. Arutyunova), as well as their influence on pragma-axiological and deregimentational character of modern business discourse. Thus, the following tasks have been set: to give the characteristic to the language phenomenon of phraseology; to analyse phraseological units with an evaluation element and to compare them with evaluation expressions of N. D. Arutyunova; to define character and importance of each evaluation type; to reveal the deconventional character of business discourse which is formed in connection with the active appeal of communicants to phraseological units of modal character and expressional expression of the subjective relation to the phenomena and processes of reality. The presented classification of evaluation types in pragma-communicative aspect proceeding from the initial strategies, tactics, characteristics and intensions of business discourse comes forward as the main result of the research. Proceeding from the features of communicative interaction within business communication, evaluation by communicants of the phenomena of reality is based on the purposes of business institute and can be presented by the following subtypes: nominative-actional; nominative-personal; nominative-situational; nominative evaluation of situation; nominative evaluation of a phenomenon / subject.

Keywords: phraseological unit, evaluation, business discourse, deconventionalisation, language expression, language behaviour

References:

1. Malyugina A. V. Ispol’zovaniye frazeologizmov, vyrazhayushchikh otsenku rechi, v biznes-kommunikatsii [Use of the phraseological units expressing speech assessment in business communication]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya, 2016, no. 4-1, pp. 157–160 (in Russian).

2. Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy. Otsenka. Sobytiye. Fakt [Types of language meaning. Assessment. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 341 p. (in Russian).

3. Fisher A. The subtle advantages of being No. 2. Fortune, 2014, July. URL: http://fortune.com/2014/07/03/deputy-position-advantages/?iid=srlink2 (accessed 11 July 2018).

4. Shkil’ O. O. Teleologicheskaya otsenka v russkom yazyke: opyt analiza otdel’nykh reprezentatsiy [Teleologic evaluation in Russian: experience of the analysis of separate representations]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, no. 331, pp. 27–30 (in Russian).

5. Forbes. USA, 2016. April 19.

6. Forbes. USA, 2016. January 18.

7. Efanova L. G. Sub“ekt normativnoy otsenki, vyrazhayemoy semantikoy yazykovykh edinits, kak nositel‘ natsional‘noy yazykovoy kartiny mira [The subject of the standard assessment expressed by semantics of language units as the carrier of a national language picture of the world]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2013, no. 1, pp. 101–106 (in Russian).

8. Vaganova T. P. Identifi katsiya eticheskoy otsenki i sposoby eye interpretatsii [Identifi cation of ethical evaluation and the ways of its interpretation]. Yazyk i kul’tura – Language and Culture, 2014, no. 15, pp. 113–116 (in Russian).

9. Forbes. USA, 2016. February 8.

10. Khramchenko D. S. Funktsional’no-pragmaticheskaya evolyutsiya angliyskogo delovogo diskursa. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Functional and pragmatic evolution of the English business discourse. Diss. doc. of philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2014. 448 p. (in Russian).

baginyan_a._y._33_37_7_196_2018.pdf ( 435.42 kB ) baginyan_a._y._33_37_7_196_2018.zip ( 429.46 kB )

Issue: 7, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND TEXT LINGUISTICS

Pages: 33 — 37

Downloads: 1522

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU