Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 23.03.2026
Home Issues 2020 Year Issue №2 BIBLICAL SYMBOLISM OF STONE IN FIGURATIVE MEANS OF RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

BIBLICAL SYMBOLISM OF STONE IN FIGURATIVE MEANS OF RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

Gnezdilova N.S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-2-68-75

Information About Author:

Gnezdilova N. S., National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050); Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: natal-gnezdilova@yandex.ru

Introduction. This article presents the results of a study on the functioning of the biblical symbolism of a stone in Russian linguistic culture expressed through figurative means of the Russian language. The relevance of the work is due to scientific interest in the study of the functioning of the figurative symbolism of a stone in biblical texts. The purpose of this work is to describe the specifics of the symbolization of the image of a stone in biblical texts expressed in the semantics of language units and figures of speech; to consider various aspects of the metaphorical interpretation of the image of a stone, based on the symbolism of the spiritual and religious traditions of the Christian culture. Material and methods. The research is carried out within the framework of cognitive and linguistic cultural approaches to the study of figurative means of language that metaphorically, symbolically, and allegorically express various phenomena of reality. The methods used are structural-semantic, conceptual and contextual analysis presented in the works on the cognitive theory of metaphor by G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. Baranov, Y. Karaulov, A. Chudinov, etc.), lexical and phraseological imagery (N. Alefirenko, N. Ilyukhina, G. Sklyarevskaya, E. Yurina, etc.), linguoculturology (M. Kovshova, V. Krasnykh, V. Telia, etc.). The source of the linguistic material is the text base of the National corpus of the Russian language. Results and discussion. This study analyzes the symbolic representation of a stone in biblical texts; describes the semantics of the allegorical character relevant in modern fiction and non-fiction, as well as the semantics and textual functioning of phraseological units that translate the symbolism of a stone. The original source of the described stable figurative expressions was the book of Holy Scripture of the old and New Testaments – the Bible. Conclusion. The results obtained demonstrate a cognitively and axiologically significant fragment of the Russian linguistic picture of the world. The data of the corpus research indicate the active functioning of the biblical symbolism of a stone in the modern Russian language.

Keywords: biblical symbolism, symbol, stone, figurative means, Russian language, cultural linguistics

References:

1. Alefirenko N. F. Frazeologicheskaya reprezentatsiya khristianskogo mirovospriyatiya (na materiale vostochnoslavyanskikh yazykov) [Phraseological representation of the Christian worldview (based on the material of the Eastern Slavic languages)]. Mir pravoslaviya: sb. nauchnykh statey [The world of Orthodoxy: a collection of scientific articles]. Volgograd, 1998. Pp. 126–131 (in Russian).

2. Alekseyev A. A. Tekstologiya slavyanskoy Biblii [Textology of the Slavic Bible]. RAN: Institut russkoy literatury (Pushkinskiy Dom) [RAS: Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House)]. Saint Petersburg, RAS Publ., 1999. 254 p. (in Russian).

3. Vereshchagin E. M. Bibleyskaya stikhiya russkogo yazyka [The biblical element of the Russian language]. Russkaya rech, 1993, no. 1, 78–96 p. (in Russian).

4. Mokiyenko V. M. Frazeologicheskiye bibleizmy v sovremennom tekste [Phraseological biblisms in a modern text]. Bibliya i vozrozhdeniye dukhovnoy kul’tury russkogo i drugikh slavyanskikh narodov. K 80-letiyu Russkoy Severo-Zapadnoy Bibleyskoy Komissii (1915–1995) [The Bible and the revival of the spiritual culture of the Russian and other Slavic peoples. On the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the Russian Northwest Bible Commission (1915–1995)]. Saint Petersburg, Petropolis Publ., 1995, pp. 143–159 (in Russian).

5. Gak V. G. Osobennosti bibleyskikh frazeologizmov v russkom yazyke v sopostavlenii s frantsuzskimi bibleizmami [Features of biblical phraseological units in Russian in comparison with French biblical units]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language), 1997, no. 5, pp. 55–65 (in Russian).

6. Gvozdarev Yu. A. Bibleizmy v russkoy frazeologii (k istorii osvoyeniya) [Bibleisms in Russian phraseology (on the history of development)]. In: Evolyutsiya leksiko-frazeologicheskogo i grammaticheskogo stroya russkogo yazyka: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. rabot [Evolution of the lexicophraseolo gical and grammatical structure of the Russian language: Interuniversity collection of scientific works]. Ed. S. G. Shulezhkova. Magnitogorsk, 1994, pp. 26–34 (in Russian).

7. Onopriyenko S. Bibleizmy sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Biblical phraseological of the modern Russian language]. Voronezh, 1997. 189 p. (in Russian).

8. Dubrovina K. N. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ bibleyskikh frazeologizmov [Encyclopedic dictionary of biblical phraseological units]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2010, pp. 4–6 (in Russian).

9. Burkanova O. P. Figury protivopolozhnosti v bogosluzhebnom tekste (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka) [Figures of the opposite in the liturgical text (based on the material of the German language)]. Nauchnyy vestnik Voronezhskogo gos. arkh.–stroit. un-ta. Sovremennye lingvisticheskiye i metodiko-didakticheskiye issledovaniya, 2010, no. 1 (13), pp. 40–47 (in Russian).

10. Semenova V. I. Frazeologicheskiye edinitsy russkogo yazyka, voskhodyashchiye k Biblii [Phraseological units of the Russian language that go back to the Bible]. Voprosy istorii russkogo yazyka [Issues of the history of the Russian language]. Tula, Tula State Pedagogical University Publ., 1968, pp. 44–50 (in Russian).

11. Starichenok V. D. Bol’shoy lingvisticheskiy slovar’ [Large linguistic dictionary]. Rostov on Don, Feniks Publ., 2008. 811 p. (in Russian).

12. Natsional’nyy korpus russkogo yazyka [National Corps of the Russian Language] (in Russian). URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru (accessed 21 January 2020).

13. Kuper Dz. Entsiklopediya simvolov [Encyclopedia of symbols]. Moscow, Zolotoy Vek, 1996. 401 p. (in Russian).

14. Mendel’son V. A. Frazeologizmy bibleyskogo proiskhozhdeniya v angliyskom i russkom yazykah [Phraseological units of biblical origin in English and Russian]. Kazan, Novoye znaniye Publ., 2009. 155 p. (in Russian).

15. Bibliya onlayn [Bible online]. URL: https://bible.by/symphony/word/10/173/ (accessed 21 January 2020] (in Russian).

gnezdilova_n._s._68_75_2_208_2020.pdf ( 459.52 kB ) gnezdilova_n._s._68_75_2_208_2020.zip ( 452.93 kB )

Issue: 2, 2020

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: LINGUOCULTUROLOGY AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION

Pages: 68 — 75

Downloads: 1680

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU